W3C Bars Public From Public Conference
xk0der writes "Danny Weitzner, one of the W3C's policy directors and event co-chair, repeatedly claimed in a follow up telephone conversation that, by "public," the W3C actually means "closed to the public." Weitzner was the person who personally barred my colleague from entering the conference."
The story is worth a read- it's very strange. Personally I think this guy is just vying to replace Tony Snow at the White House.
He'll sort it out over a nice pot of tea, and perhaps some scones.
Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
This is the sort of thing that happens when you make announcements on Opposite Day.
Couldn't they just call it a protected conference and get a conference that's private to the unwashed masses and public to objects of types that are friends of W3C? I mean, that's what the keyword is there for.
More Twoson than Cupertino
apparently-insane double-speak W3C overlords.
-WtC
Creator of RPerl, Scouter, Juggler, Mormon, Perl Monger, Serial Entrepreneur, Aspiring Astrophysicist, Community Organiz
"Bald-faced lie"? I think that translates to 'standard operating procedure' in Washingtonese.
"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
"Inflammable means flammable? What a country!"
The rest of us got a 417 response - "Expectation Failed"
Kevin Smith on Prince
I believe this conference was "public as in beer" not "public as in speech."
That should clear it up for everyone.
Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
Well, thank god you're here to tell us why you left! Waitaminnit...