Slashdot Mirror


FBI Seeks To Restrict University Student Freedoms

amigoro writes with a link to the Press Escape blog, which is discussing new guidelines suggest by the FBI for university administrations. The Federal Bureau, worried about the possibility of international espionage via our centers of learning, now sees the need to restrict the freedoms of university students for national security. "FBI is offering to brief faculty, students and staff on what it calls 'espionage indicators' aimed at identifying foreign agents. Unexplained affluence, failing to report overseas travel, showing unusual interest in information outside the job scope, keeping unusual work hours, unreported contacts with foreign nationals, unreported contact with foreign government, military, or intelligence officials, attempting to gain new accesses without the need to know, and unexplained absences are all considered potential espionage indicators."

9 of 593 comments (clear)

  1. Serious? by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unexplained affluence

    Ummmm, that is what an education is supposed to get you.

    failing to report overseas travel

    Oh, my students are supposed to check in with me everywhere they go?

    showing unusual interest in information outside the job scope

    Hey! I want my students to explore new and interesting things. That is what they are here to do.

    keeping unusual work hours

    They had *better* be working their asses off. :-)

    unreported contacts with foreign nationals

    Ummmm, collaboration? There are folks outside the US that *are* doing exciting science you know...

    unreported contact with foreign government, military, or intelligence officials

    OK, I might give them this.

    attempting to gain new accesses without the need to know

    Oh, jeez..... these people have been in government too long. Compartmentalized information is certainly appropriate, but in an educational setting, where people are not doing sensitive work? Come on now, if you are involved in classified work, you have to pass background checks and *obtain* clearance, particularly for compartmentalized projects.

    and unexplained absences are all considered potential espionage indicators.

    Sure, whatever. They might also be skiing...

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  2. Re:Since when by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Did universities in the United States become part of the FBI?

    Tell you what, when they arrest the Attorney General, Vice President and President and charge them with the long list of crimes they have committed against the US people, against the US constitution and against humanity, then lets talk about this stuff eh?

    They have by any objective standards ordered torture and committed other war crimes.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  3. great, i'm going to get into trouble... by Digitus1337 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "...showing unusual interest in information outside the job scope..." A true thirst for knowledge will arrouse suspicion? Do we really want this? Controlling information is the first step down a nasty road.

  4. Re:FUD-O-Rama by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, the FBI wants people to report suspicious activity. Wow!! I'm outraged.

    The problem with the mock-outrage and crocodile tears for things like this is that it desensitizes people. When freedoms are actually, genuinely under assault, it'll get posted on Slashdot and everyone will ask "What is Slashdot whining about this time? Should I read the article to find out how it's misinformation again, or should I just save time and assume it's misinformation, like it usually is?"

    Freedom is important. It's far too important for this. It's important to be vigilant to protect it. Pretending there's an assault on freedom when there isn't don't count as vigilance -- rather it provides cover so the real anti-freedom measures get lost in the noise.

  5. Re:FUD-O-Rama by fredklein · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So your opinion of what's suspicious and your cartoon-version interpretation of the FBI's opinion differ.

    The Govt is what is 'cartoonish'.
    Stolen from : http://www.hoboes.com/Mimsy/?ART=96:

    Back in 1991, the Pittsburgh Press did a survey of reasons for DEA agents taking people's money when they come off of airplanes. It was classic profiling:

    Agents in Illinois are told its suspicious if their subjects are among the first people off a plane, because it shows they're in a hurry.
    In Michigan, the DEA says that being the last off a plane is suspicious because the subject is trying to appear unconcerned.
    And in Ohio, agents are told suspicion should surface when suspects deplane in the middle of a group because they may be trying to lose themselves in the crowd.


    What freedom is taken away by the FBI asking people to watch out for certain behaviors

    Nothing.

    IF the behaviours are not unreasonable vague.

    The list of behaviours mentioned here IS unreasonably vague.

    It creates a surveilance society. People become afraid to do or say anything because their neighbors might report them for 'suspicious activity'. "I tell you, officer, they left town last week, and didn't tell everyone about their travel plans." "The father leaves for work WAY to early, and gets home late sometimes..." "They bought a new car last week. Where'd they get the cash? Must be terrorists..."
  6. Re:FUD-O-Rama by gorehog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unexplained affluence, failing to report overseas travel, showing unusual interest in information outside the job scope, keeping unusual work hours, unreported contacts with foreign nationals, unreported contact with foreign government, military, or intelligence officials, attempting to gain new accesses without the need to know

    Look at this list. The problem with it is that it takes things that are NORMAL for intellectuals to try to do and calls them suspicious.

    I always thought the "need to know" was assumed to be granted to the people except in special cases where the government classifies information. If it's not specifically restricted then we have a right to it. This mandate from the Feds puts students and professors under a nasty microscope.

    How does one explain their affluence? Most rich people are never asked where the money came from. Interrogating affluence leads to nothing more than vindictive sophistry.

    Who do I have to report overseas travel to? Isn't it enough to inform the State Department that I travel? now I have to report my summer vacation plans to the school administration?

    Information outside the job scope? So, if I'm a humanities student and taking welding classes at night I'm a terrorist?

    A lot of people go into academics because of the flexible schedule. In that context what are unusual hours?

    Unreported contacts with foreign nationals? Aside from academic and intellectual interest in world affairs and the question of who is the supervisor waiting for a report...this is a violation of the fourth (fifth?) amendment protections which guarantee you to be secure in your personal effects. Oh yeah...there's also something about freedom of speech.

    unreported contact with foreign government? same as above. WTF, if I choose to emigrate I have to inform my school administration?

    I've only provided one example per case. What it comes down to is that EVERY item on that list has many many legitimate purposes to exist. What the FBI might really be on about here is the chance that aggressive academics might be able to make a case for toppling this government by legal means. I think the Feds are circling wagons and playing defense.

  7. Re:Since when by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, uh... what made all the 19 terrorists in 2001? If you buy UBL's reasons, us having troops stationed in the Arabian peninsula during the first Iraq war. That's what got him going...not supposed to allow infidels, and CERTAINTLY not infidel troops.

    What made those that blew up the Cole? more of the same--also having a ship stationed off the peninsula.. same troops thing as above.

    What made those that blew up our embassies in Africa? Since al-qaida, same thing as above.

    What made those that blew up Marine Barracks in Lebanon? Us maintaining troops in a foreign country? I've never really understood this one as a terrorist action--can attacks on solely military targets really be "terrorist" ?

    What made the Turks invade Europe? I don't know, what made Europeans invade Africa, Mongols invade China, Germany invade Poland, etc etc etc... why does anyone invade anyone? turks were conquering places well before they were Muslim, so I don't think you can blame that one on Islam!

    Please note I'm not JUSTIFYING any of these... they're complete BS. but saying that there is no reason is also silly--the people doing the attacking have plenty of reasons. Iran doesn't randomly hate us, they hate us for helping to get rid of Mossadegh and supporting the repressive Shah all those years. UBL doesn't randomly hate us (though he comes close..) he has specific reasons. Again, I'm not saying any of these are GOOD reasons, I'm just saying, had we never interfered in the middle east, never supported cruel dictators, and never sent troops over there, things might be different.

    One could also make the argument it's good to fight Islamic fundamentalism, period. I might even say that! I do rather think it's one of those self perpetuating things though...the more you fight it, the more it pops up.

    I'll also agree that the original poster (the BLAME BUSH!!! guy) is a whacko...
  8. Re:Since when by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are a sick fool.

    Your hands are covered in the blood of both Americans and Iraqis. If there were any justice, you'd get drafted. Instead, you've got all the Rush Limbo you can eat.

    Disgusting Republican slave.


    Drafted? No, I volunteered. I served in the US Army and did two tours in the Mid East. I met the thankful Kuwaitis who fell all over themselves to thank me, no matter how many times I said "No thanks necessary" and "Your very welcome". I saw the kids and parents who were missing hands, feet, tongues, eyes and got to meet them. I am sad that I could not be there to stop the mass graves from filling up. I'm sorry I was not able to kill the men who shot women in the head and threw them into mass graves, still clutching their screaming children. No, I could do nothing for these people because people like you don't give a shit about anyone but yourselves. It does not bother you at all to know that millions of men, women and children were murdered in cold blood while you rely on corrupt politicians to compromise with thugs, rapists and murderers. It doesn't bother you at all that children starve or die from preventable diseases because YOU don't care enough about them to shut your mouth long enough for me to rescue these people and give them a chance at life.

    Yeah, if that makes me a sick fool, then I'll wear that badge with pride. However, don't you dare sit there and tell me I have the blood of Americans on my hands unless you want your blood to be the first! I may have Iraqi blood on my hands, but it was Iraqis that did all the stuff I described above. I'm willing to get blood on my hands for the lives and liberty of the innocent. What will you do beyond going to a "concert for peace" or put a "Bush-Bin-Lying" bumper sticker on your car? Sorry, but neither concerts nor bumper stickers have saved a life or freed a society. So until you are willing to get off your fat, peace-lovin ass and actually fight for something beyond "your right to party", I suggest you shut the fuck up as you have no idea as to what you are talking about.

    So, yeah, there is justice and I helped provide it.

    (Yeah, it's OT, but don't mod me 'off topic' unless you do the same for the parent)

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  9. Re:Since when by Elrac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK ArcherB, you're not a sick fool. What you are in fact is a patriotic, loyal, good-hearted, well-intentioned fool.

    Thanks to your efforts and the efforts of thousands of others like you, death rates in Iraq have more than doubled; many thousands of Iraqis have fled the country, and life for those who remain has been horribly disrupted by the constant fear of violence. Yes, Saddam was an evil dictator who used of torture and violence. But if you look at the bottom line, most Iraqi citizens were better off before the US invasion than after.

    The thankful Kuwaitis you rescued are exactly the affluent, self-serving egotists you rant against. They bless you for having rescued their material comforts, and saving their corrupt government from the consequences of drilling laterally into Iraqi territory. Furthermore, when they're not being rescued, they hate Americans every bit as much as the Iraqis do.

    The fact that you risked your life does not automatically make you a better person than those who know better. You followed your evil, bumbling President into the greatest disaster in American history and are still blind enough to feel all righteous about it. If you ever come to see the truth, I hope it doesn't hurt you too badly.

    --
    When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Rel