Slashdot Mirror


Nintendo's Market Value Briefly Tops Sony's

GameDaily reports on news from Reuters; today for the first time Nintendo outpaced Sony's market value. Note that this isn't Sony's games wing, but the entirety of the Sony corporation. Investor confidence spurred by brisk sales of the DS and Wii pushed Nintendo (briefly) into the top ten earners in the nation of Japan, with such rarefied organizations as Honda, Toyota, and Canon. "Nintendo's shares rose to a record high 46,350 yen in the morning, increasing its overall market value to 6.57 trillion yen ($53 billion), which allowed it to surpass Sony's market capitalization for a time. The company's shares, however, finished the day a bit lower putting Nintendo back in 11th place behind Sony, but still ahead of Panasonic maker Matsushita, whose sales are over eight times larger than Nintendo's. Nintendo's market value closed at 6.39 trillion yen on Monday, just below Sony's 6.48 trillion yen."

137 comments

  1. Great news by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    Especially since I bought Nintendo stock when I saw Sony repeatedly shooting itself in the foot.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:Great news by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      Bah, would that I had had the money to invest in Nintendo a year ago, when I very much wanted to.

    2. Re:Great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stock market is no place for idiots or fanboys.

      Though in your case since your just making shit up, just take it as some future advice for when you move out of your mom's basement and actually have money from a real job to invest.

    3. Re:Great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, I mean given how deep the Wii has buried the PS3, I wouldn't be surprised if his mom were now living in his basement.

    4. Re:Great news by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, its 90% idiots and fanboys. You make your money by predicting how the idiots and fanboys will react.

      In this case it wasn't fanboyism. I saw one company about to go out on a limb with an innovative new product. I saw another company about to go out with an overpriced product that didn't provide much more than their last generation. I saw a lot of buzz among the gaming community about the innovative new product. I decided I had room in my portfolio for some risk, took it, and made a decent chunk of change.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    5. Re:Great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I saw one company about to go out on a limb with an innovative new product. I saw another company about to go out with an overpriced product that didn't provide much more than their last generation."

      Wait... which one is Sony and which one is Nintendo? Paying $200 for an overclocked gamecube that doesn't provide much over the past generation other than a magic wand gimmick seems overpriced to me -- and a console with all the connectivity and processing power of a high-end desktop sure seems innovative, even if that's not what you meant to imply.

    6. Re:Great news by riskeetee · · Score: 1

      In the US, the stock is traded as NTDOY (on Yahoo, it's NTDOY.PK http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=NTDOY.PK). It's on the "Pink Sheets http://www.pinksheets.com/about/index.jsp," as an OTC (over-the-counter) traded stock.

      NTDOY stock represents 1/8 of a share of Nintendo stock traded on the Tokyo stock exchange, NTDOF represents one share. Most people trade the NTDOY, which is currently trading at 45.85.

    7. Re:Great news by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, someone doesn't sound just slightly angry they wern't Nintendo's target demographic.

    8. Re:Great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly PS3 fanchildren just can't get over the fact that the Wii is successful.

    9. Re:Great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cry more sony fanboy.

    10. Re:Great news by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      Paying $200 for an overclocked gamecube that doesn't provide much over the past generation other than a magic wand gimmick seems overpriced to me -- and a console with all the connectivity and processing power of a high-end desktop sure seems innovative, even if that's not what you meant to imply.

      Well now, one of these is making just under a hojillion dollars a millisecond in profit, and the other is languishing on store shelves. Regardless of which one you think is 'innovative' and 'overpriced', the parent made a decision that is going to net him a nice chunk of cash. That's the bottom line.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    11. Re:Great news by blackicye · · Score: 1

      I think one of the strongest selling points for the Wii is that there are modchips already available. And you can download and burn games onto DVDRs.

      Its likely that once the PS3s copy protection has been broken, their sales will increase drastically (much more so than a price cut would induce.) Because even without the relative availability and affordability of bluray burners, being able to easily swap out the harddrive (or hack the interface to fit a full size 3.5" SATA drive) will work.

      This also seemed to be the case with the Xbox 360 hacked drive firmware and the PSP downgrades. I'm not sure if anyone has tabulated any sales figures, pre or post each consoles DRM being defeated, but I'm willing to wager those numbers would look quite interesting.

      I'm sure this is a bad thing (tm) for software publishers and developers, but as far as the competition for the number of consoles sold goes, having your DRM cracked = console sales.

    12. Re:Great news by donaldm · · Score: 1

      If you wish to play the stock market then you cannot afford to get attached to your stock, as well as taking advice from a competent stockbroker or adviser, of course it helps if you are one. In addition you also have to be prepared to loose money but with good advise you can make quite a considerable amount of money.

      From the Article:
      For all the positives surrounding Nintendo right now, though, Koyama cautioned that investors need to be very careful with the stock. "This is one of those companies that is not exactly making daily necessities. One negative factor and shares could take a dive. We need to be careful in dealing with shares like this," he said.

      Also from the Article:
      Sony in fact has been doing quite well despite recent struggles with the PS3. The company's shares have increased 66 percent over the past two years, outperforming the Nikkei average, which rose 57 percent. It's just that Nintendo has been doing much, much better. Nintendo shares have skyrocketed nearly fourfold over the same period.


      Like any shares it pays to do your homework and don't over extend but I have to admit it would have been nice to invested in Nintendo early. I may be wrong but now may be a good time to reinvest in other shares while Nintendo is doing well, of course that is your call. Still I don't have Sony or Nintendo shares but the shares I do have have doubled and even tripled in the last few years so I am quite happy.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    13. Re:Great news by donaldm · · Score: 1

      I would assume the strongest selling point for the Wii is it's perceived fun factor with it's unusual movement sensing controller, not the ability to mod it which would void it's warranty.

      As far as cracking the PS3 copy protection which will be done sooner or later I assume you have a cheap collection of Blu-Ray disks that you can afford to copy your games to. That and that alone makes copying PS3 games expensive. This was one of the reasons why the PS2 had DVD since coping games to a DVD was expensive in 2000. Over time as Blu-Ray disks come down in price you will start to see pirating of games but this becomes a none event when you can get second-hand games and even some newer games fairly cheap.

      When people buy electronic equipment (taking consoles as an example) they try to get an extended warranty of an additional one to four years and chipping a console voids the warranty. People who do this while under warranty and the PS3 and the Wii are still under standard warranty around the world have IMHO more money then sense, still what they do with their money is their business.

      The average consumer has no knowledge of electronics so unless they pay to get their console modded for what I see is very little gain and are willing to void their warranty the number of consoles being modded will remain very small, since the average consumer will not take that risk.

      With regard to cracking DVD movies (not sure about games) just use any number of good cracking tools on your PC (Microsoft your friendly pirating platform :-) - sorry could not resist) and convert them to MP4's and put them on a PSP or SD or USB drive, Memory Stick or even a 320GB hard USB drive or bigger and you can then play them back via the PS3 which actually up-scales the MP4 movie to at least 720p via component cable and it really looks quite good. Why bother taking a chance voiding your warranty when your PC can do all the work for you, in fact the un-modded PS3 and PSP can double as a media center client to your PC.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    14. Re:Great news by superbus1929 · · Score: 1

      No, Nintendo released a gimmick that has captivated the casual gaming market. Who cares if it's an over-clocked Gamecube that doesn't actually provide shit except a new way to blame game loss on shitty controls? It took the market by storm, and therefore made Nintendo - and people like the poster in question - a LOT of money. Even if the Wii falls off the face of the earth as game makers fail to make anything remotely interesting that doesn't involve Mario and Co., the money's been made, and smart investors can sell now while it's high. And don't forget the DS's stranglehold on the market, either; the only thing the PSP really has going for it is RPGs in that aspect.

      --
      Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".
    15. Re:Great news by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Sure it's successfull, but the attach rate is low. Wii's are selling to people who aren't traditional gamers and who simply do not buy games. Those people are using their Wii's as a manner similar to those joysticks with built in games. They're not Wii's but Wii Sports machines.

    16. Re:Great news by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the DS's stranglehold on the market, either; the only thing the PSP really has going for it is RPGs in that aspect.


      But that is strong market. If you want portable RPG's the PSP is the go to device similar to how the PS2 was/is.
    17. Re:Great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it's successfull, but the attach rate is low.

      We're selling plenty of Wii games here, and almost no PS3 games. Where's the evidence that the Wii's attach rate is low?
    18. Re:Great news by blackicye · · Score: 1

      As far as cracking the PS3 copy protection which will be done sooner or later I assume you have a cheap collection of Blu-Ray disks that you can afford to copy your games to. That and that alone makes copying PS3 games expensive. This was one of the reasons why the PS2 had DVD since coping games to a DVD was expensive in 2000. Over time as Blu-Ray disks come down in price you will start to see pirating of games but this becomes a none event when you can get second-hand games and even some newer games fairly cheap.


      HDloaders. Rip or FTP/Samba the files over to a harddrive. No burning involved. As far as bluray is concerned I don't think it will happen any time soon.

      People generally do not download or pirate bargain bin or older titles. They do it with the latest releases, preferably before they hit store shelves.
    19. Re:Great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Gamecube was way ahead of the PS2 in terms of graphics and capability. Why was the PS2 a "gamers" system. Why was the PS2 a much better seller than the Gamecube? Who gets to decide who the "real" gamers are? Who cares what "gamers" think? Is more units sold, but not to real gamers, better than selling less?

      Aren't ALL gaming systems TOYS?? Gaming is a Couch Potato activity. Those that are the so-called "real" gamers need to get a life and stop thinking of game playing as some sacred and holy activity. Gaming is a pass time.

  2. Explains what step 2 was by Dorceon · · Score: 1
    in the old nugget:
    1. Buy Nintendo stock
    2. ???
    3. Profit!
    --
    What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
    1. Re:Explains what step 2 was by SydShamino · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you are a corporate execute at Sony's console division:

      1. Buy Nintendo stock
      2. Open your mouth
      3. Profit!

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:Explains what step 2 was by CarnivoreMan · · Score: 1

      That ref doesnt really apply here.. There is no unknown magical step #2 like between the underpants and profit.

  3. Do one thing by Volante3192 · · Score: 2

    and do it WELL. Just seems to me to be a better business model than to try to do everything and not be able to focus on anything.

    Course, I'm a Ninty fanboy, so I'm slightly biased...

    1. Re:Do one thing by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, well, wasn't that GMC's slogan? Apparently, they take "one thing" to mean "make cars and run the world's largest health insurance plan". Go fig.

    2. Re:Do one thing by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd argue they didn't exactly adhere to the "well" part... But that's a whole nother debate, one I'd probably lose simply for lack of an knowledge on the topic.

    3. Re:Do one thing by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nonsense. GM runs a really good loan business. They just have to work out how to make their loss leaders (cars) a bit more efficiently.

    4. Re:Do one thing by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd argue they didn't exactly adhere to the "well" part... But that's a whole nother debate, one I'd probably lose simply for lack of an knowledge on the topic.

      I think it's a good point though. GMC really didn't do the car making part "well" anymore. They've been catch up with the Japanese and the Europeans in the "Quality" department for decades now. American cars are boring, uncool, have a reputation for not lasting.

      The first thing I notice when I sit down in a car is the console. I want a console that LOOKS NICE. I can get a 20k Japanese car with an amazing console that visually is beautiful, I get a stylish speedometer, color matched interior, and a radio that looks intricate and provides a lot of functionality. I can buy a 20k American car and I get a console with a red stick mechanical speedometer, a radio with buttons that are each 2 inches by 1 inch, and knobs that are 2 inches across, with an LCD display that shows NOTHING more than a GIANT display of numbers for the radio station I'm listening to. NONE of the interior bits in American cars are color matched, none of the features wow you with their creativity in solving basic ergonomic and spatial problems.

      I have to admit the Chevy Malibu I drove recently was a nice fresh breath of air. I could have sworn it wasn't an American car, it's interior was actually stylish.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    5. Re:Do one thing by aliquis · · Score: 1

      That's ok because in Nintendos case they do consoles, games and pokémon (games, consoles, toys, furry animals, series, movies, ...)

    6. Re:Do one thing by Grave · · Score: 1

      GMC is a division of GM, not GM itself. GMC sells more trucks than any non-American brand. They might not have had the greatest interiors until recently, but their trucks are very reliable and capable. When it comes to trucks, those things matter far more than a stylish interior (which GM as a whole has been making huge strides in). So I'd say GMC's slogan is fairly accurate.

    7. Re:Do one thing by HarvardAce · · Score: 1

      GM runs a really good loan business.

      GMAC is no longer a subsidiary of GM. It was sold to a private equity firm, and GM only has a minority stake in it.

      --
      Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
    8. Re:Do one thing by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      They sold their most profitable division? Crazy. I guess they wanted to concentrate on their core competency... losing money.

  4. Rush Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big money goes around Japan?

    1. Re:Rush Change by xero314 · · Score: 1

      Being one of the few to get the reference, I have to give you props for pulling that at.

    2. Re:Rush Change by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      Nice... Always great to see a Rush reference. New album is amazing, btw... been listening to it non-stop.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  5. Time to short? by jandrese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds to me like Nintendo might be a bit overvalued. The Wii is great, but the games have just been trickling out for it and people are going to lose some of their enthusiasm for the system before too long. I'm not an investor, but I can't see how they can maintain that sort of overinflated valuation for too long.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Time to short? by Altus · · Score: 4, Insightful


      yes, games have been few and far between for the Wii, but the console has sold like hotcakes. This implies that games will be released for it in the future.

      A lot of game development companies bet against the Wii and that was a poor bet for them to make. I'm sure many of them would like to go back and release on the Wii just to get a crack at the installed base. I doubt they will make the same mistake now that the Wii is on the market and outselling the other consoles.

      That said, Nintendo is probably close to the peak of its value and would not make a fantastic investment right now. Even if the console continues to sell well and the new games come out and Nintendo is fantastically successful, how much higher can the stock reasonably go?

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    2. Re:Time to short? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "how much higher can the stock reasonably go?"

      no need for reason. this is the stockmarket, after all.

    3. Re:Time to short? by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds to me like Nintendo might be a bit overvalued. The Wii is great, but the games have just been trickling out for it and people are going to lose some of their enthusiasm for the system before too long. I'm not an investor, but I can't see how they can maintain that sort of overinflated valuation for too long.

      The funny thing is, they've survived thus far on classics such as mario, zelda and so on. Why would you think they suddenly need a river of games to keep gamers interested.

      It's not about quantity here. PS3 is rolling out 380 games by end of next year (they say). How many of those will really matter.

      That said, with the number of sales going into the Wii right now, I can see this sparkling some newfound interest in the platofrm in the biggest companies in the market (such as EA).

      Now of course, I agree Nintendo is overvalued right now. Somewhat. But I think Wii will do just fine at the same time.

    4. Re:Time to short? by DaAdder · · Score: 5, Informative

      Games have been trickling out since most of the game producers are of the wait-and-see variety.

      The Wii's success was soon evident to everyone though and most of the large game makers jumped on the bandwageon. However since games aren't produced in an instant, you'll see an avalanche of games released for the Wii, starting late '07, but mostly throughout, and towards the end of, '08.

      News is surfacing that some companies are shifting focus from Sony to Nintendo entirely:
      http://kotaku.com/gaming/the-tide/big-japanese-pub lishers-shift-from-sony-to-nintendo-271785.php

      My guess is that this'll keep happening unless/until the PS3 somehow manages to pick it sales up significantly and reach some form of critical mass.

    5. Re:Time to short? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I agree that Nintendo is probably overvalued, but I don't think it's because of the games. Yes the games are just trickling out, but that's fairly normal in the first year of a console's life, and we know that a lot of studios were caught off guard by the Wii's success at launch and thus will be late bringing games to the Wii. The time to worry about a lack of games will be Christmas, when having the AAA titles out will be important.

      The reason I think N is probably overvalued is simply because the company's real-life size and sales are not high enough to bear out the growth that their high market cap suggests investors are speculating on. Call me old-fashioned or a dot-bomb survivor, but I just don't like seeing a company's stock riding on hype and dreams of unrestricted growth when the actual sales, while fantastic in terms of N's quarterly profit making, simply don't support that idea.

      Now I don't have a lot of facts to back that up. I tried looking up Nitendo's P/E ratio (basically the metric I'm talking about) but couldn't find it. Sony has a P/E ratio of 53 according to yahoo finance, which is higher than I expected. But my post is predicated on the idea that Nintendo, being solely a games company instead of an industry behemoth like Sony (as opposed to Sony's game devision by itself), has much lower earnings and therefore an even higher p/e ratio.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:Time to short? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      IMHO, they're not overvalued enough to justify much of a fall in stock price, if any at all. The DS is one of the most successful gaming systems of all time and the Wii is looking to do just as well. The DS had a rough time just after its launch with a lack of games as well. So while I think Nintendo is overvalued for now, I think that it's just a waiting game at this point, with more AAA titles from Nintendo and developer support ramping up.

    7. Re:Time to short? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of game development companies bet against the Wii and that was a poor bet for them to make.
      Why? Where are all of the third party titles for Wii that are making tons of cash? Installed base is not enough to guarantee sales, and remember that PS2 still has everything else beat in that department.
    8. Re:Time to short? by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hi,

      My kids play the Wii constantly. I play it when I get the time to. There, now you've heard from a Wii owner whose system isn't gathering dust.

      If you are the kind of person who is out buying 1080p TV sets when they still cost as much as they do, then you're probably also the kind of person who will spend $600 on a game console so you can have the most powerful system on the market. If that's you, then go buy a PS3. Technophiles are not the target market for the Wii.

      If you didn't like any of Nintendo's previous offerings, why would you think you would like the Wii? Did you just get one because everyone else was, and you wanted to be part of the crowd? Or did you pretend to get one just so you could troll Slashdot?

      I agree with you that Nintendo's stock will fall (although probably not plummet), but not for the reasons you state.

    9. Re:Time to short? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey look, it is the increasingly shrill Sony troll - haven't seen it in a while!

    10. Re:Time to short? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you sir are just too smart for the rest of us. The Wii does look fantastic on a big screen HD TV and everyone really is happy with the Wii release list of games for 2007/8. And, no, HD TVs aren't rapidly falling in price and no one is buying them. And nobody ever talks about the Wiimote getting old or getting bored with their Wii.

      Sir, we salute you for correcting the record.

    11. Re:Time to short? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good innit? And you know, if he was a little bit more shrill... Or a tiny bit more desperate, or told a few more utterly transparent lies that reminded me of the Iraqi Information Minister... He might actually push me over the edge! I might have to rush out and... Oh wait, $600. Nah

    12. Re:Time to short? by valintin · · Score: 1

      One of the local bars in town has a Wii now. Credit card or a 40 dollar deposit on the controllers. No outside games; No boxing; No 18 rounds of Golf; Must use wrist strap.

      That's amazing and not something that is going to suddenly fallout with players.

    13. Re:Time to short? by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

      Even in the case where there are no current third party titles that sold significantly (although I believe titles such as Rayman contest this), the statement can still be true.

      If we assume that every third party publisher of repute and skill ignored the Wii or otherwise gave it passing attention, then it would make perfect sense that there are no (or very few) notable third party titles. Almost everyone missed the boat.

      Install base doesn't guarantee sales, and I'm sure most companies are taking into consideration the demographics of the three consoles when they choose which to support, but it does push sales higher. A hypothetical install base of 10 million PS3s is almost certain to have more sales than a hypothetical 1 million. It's more blurry across different consoles, but the fundamental principle is the same. A larger installbase is a larger market, which can support larger sales.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    14. Re:Time to short? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't be so harsh, it is nice to get input from the trailer trash/Walmart shopping bought a Wii with welfare check crowd. That demo has always been a key indicator to the future of the console market Okay, how about the bought my console at Best Buy, have enough money to live in a house, make more money then a whiney AC on /. who probably is jealous because of the lack of a Wii. I make enough to afford a nice car too, but hell, if I didn't still manage to find money to buy a Wii and time to play it in between work. Stupid trolls.
    15. Re:Time to short? by MeanderingMind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hi, I have a 46" HD TV, the sound system to go with it, and an Xbox 360 to play on it. I haven't touched the Xbox except to play movies for some time. Maybe once in the past 6 months (when Armored Core 4 came out).

      I also have a Wii.

      The Wii is not as impressive graphically as the 360 on the HDTV, but I can not say it looks like crap. It's decent, not "Wow" but decent. The 360 and PS3 are "Wow" when it comes to graphics, I'll give them that much.

      However, I play my Wii far more than my other consoles. That's not to say I spend oodles of time playing it, but it garners more of my attention.

      If you want a system that looks like crap on an HDTV, get a PS2. Several of my games were literally unplayable because of how it was displayed. It was visibly different than how it would look on an SDTV to the point of being a garbled mess. Unless the game is explicitly HD, it's probably going to look terrible.

      I doubt the GP fits into the "trailer trash" stereotype anymore than I do. There are far better arguments to make against the Wii than ad hominem attacks. You're intelligent enough to spell, you should be intelligent enough to come up with something more substancial than pure insults.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    16. Re:Time to short? by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I know I'm excited about Metroid Prime: Corruption, Super Smash Bros: Brawl, Super Mario Galaxy, and Manhunt 2 (damn the ESRB) etc. Glad to see others are as well. /notsarcasm

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    17. Re:Time to short? by CCW · · Score: 1

      If you don't like it, sell it on ebay and get your money back. Better be quick too - They are still going for a premium but at some point that will change with all the wii owners being so disillusioned with their system. Then you can pick up a PS3 at discount and enjoy that HDTV resolution goodness while you watch all the great blueray movies and play whatever game it is that PS3 gamers like. Or pick up an XBox360 and watch HD-DVD movies and play whatever game it is that XBox360 gamers like.

      What I don't understand is why you are complaining here about how you stupidly spent your money and trying to make it be that you were victimized by Nintendo marketing. Fix it and move on. At WORST you will be out about $10.

      I would suggest that you take a hard look at what kind of lifestyle you are chasing before you get too deep into HDTV accessories, since being upset about a $250 purchase demonstrates a bit of a disconnect with your strategy.

    18. Re:Time to short? by zstlaw · · Score: 1

      At a party recently a group of well-off yuppie gamers with a couple game developers thrown in mostly shrugged at a topic of the PS3 and Resistance Fall of Man, then got really excited about the merits of the technology behind the 360's Gears of War. I think this shows how little the PS3 has done to catch its core demographic of serious gamers with money for tech.

      And yet the Wii is the social system. At the party several people played the Wii, non-gamer friends of the host picked it up and had fun with us gamers. The other systems seem to only attract the gamers. Now my friends are buying Wiis just to have around for social gatherings. Even my girlfriend's mom wants to come over and play our Wii.

      I own a 1080 plasma HDTV. My girlfriend bought it for gaming. And yet the Wii games just appeal more than the other systems even despite the lower graphics. It is absurd how dominant Nintendo has been this generation. Everyone I know has a Wii. How many DS systems do I see on the subway every day?

      My previous postings still stand. If the PS3 does not have a stellar Christmas the system might as well be repackaged as a low-end Blue-ray player.

    19. Re:Time to short? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At a party recently a group of well-off yuppie gamers with a couple game developers thrown in mostly shrugged at a topic of the PS3 and Resistance Fall of Man, then got really excited about the merits of the technology behind the 360's Gears of War."

      Why the hell would you post something so fucking inane with your real account?

      If you're going to make up stories...of fuck it dimwit. Plonk!

    20. Re:Time to short? by metroid+composite · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I always scratch my head when people say "where are the games?"

      Number of Games released in 2007 according to Gamerankings:

      360: 53
      PS2: 45
      PSP: 44
      DS: 35
      Wii: 26
      PS3: 17

      Now, as previous people have said, systems typically have a game drought right after launch. Wii and DS are also in a funny position where they tend to get more exclusives but fewer ports due to their unique controls and crap (the big reason why PSP consistently has more releases than DS). Fact is, despite being fresh off launch, Wii is already not far from DS level game release schedules. Seems healthy enough to me.

      And before anyone objects with "where are the high profile games in 2007?" ...glancing at gamerankings again I see three "Mario" games (Super Paper Mario, Mario Strikers Charged, Mario Party 8), Resident Evil 4, Warioware, a collection of EA games (Tiger Woods, Godfather, SSX), Sonic, Wii Play (say what you will, but it's the best-selling Wii game this year; possibly best-selling console game actually). For a traditionally slow stretch of the year (developers all want to release their games in November) that doesn't strike me as a weak lineup in the slightest.

    21. Re:Time to short? by ozphx · · Score: 1

      At the moment its valued more than the combined might of all of Sony. That includes Sony-BMG etc.

      I find that amazing. I'm honestly surprised that the word Sony isnt worth more than all of Ninty ;)

      I like the Wii and all, but Sony is a great big bloody monolith (like the ps3, heh)

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    22. Re:Time to short? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after reading digg and then reading this post makes me remember why I love Slashdot

    23. Re:Time to short? by satoshi1 · · Score: 1

      Awww! Little fanboy's favorite system didn't do as well as they hoped? Go cry. It's funny.

    24. Re:Time to short? by LKM · · Score: 1

      I agree that Nintendo is overvalued, but not for the reasons you state. Nintendo will soon come out with Wii Sports follow ups like Wii Music and Wii Fitness. That will give them yet another boost - not to mention their "hardcore market" fanservices like the new Mario or the new Metroid games. I have little doubt that the Wii will be the dominant console this generation, just like the DS dominates the portable market. Personally, I think that within five years, Nintendo will have sold as many Wiis as 360s and PS3s combined.

      No, the reason I think they've overvalued is that they are a console company and nothing else. Even if they dominate the console and the handheld market, they are in a different league than Sony. Furthermore, the console business is a harsh business. The fact that Nintendo will most likely dominate this generation does not mean that they can keep this up during the next gen. I would guess that Nintendo stock might be rather volatile. I have no doubt many people will try to dump their Nintendo stock as soon as there's the slightest hint of danger on the horizon.

    25. Re:Time to short? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      But the Wii is outselling the PS3 bigtime.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    26. Re:Time to short? by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

      by Anonymous Coward...
      Why the hell would you post something so fucking inane with your real account?
      If you're going to make up stories...of fuck it dimwit. Plonk!

      Yea, you really told him. Way to stand up and be accountable, you Anonymous fucking Coward. He told a decent story, giving a representative demonstration of one of the main markets that the PS3 is for and how Sony has failed to enthuse. I really feel trolled for even responding, and I am probably bringing the conversation down - but this story among others is an indication into how Nintendo has seen it's market share grow so healthy.

      Nintendo is very good at making their product smaller, cheaper, and more energy efficient. They chose to stick to the basics of what they had with the GameCube and it has payed off. They have to have saved so much money with that choice, that they could put a bunch of time and research into a next gen console in a year or two that would be able to take the gains in UI from the gamecube and bring to market a system that would just amaze the market. These factors, as well as others (Virtual Console, etc) lead them to where they are today. The interesting part is not many saw this coming. The Playstation came out of no where and did great for years, and the PS2 carried this forward for Sony. How the PS3 has failed so far in the market place should be looked into more ... but instead we just get typical "we love the Wii" journalism.

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    27. Re:Time to short? by Rathmine · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ regarding your account of a PS2 looking like crap on an HDTV. Judging by the description of your television, I take it you are probably looking at an LCD or plasma screen 46" in size, in which case I am out of my element as far as the gaming experience. On my 26" 16:9 CRT HDTV, however, the PS2 looks excellent by my standards, doubly so when I'm able to invoke the blessed "Progressive" setting that games such as God of War offer. But even on meager SD games, the graphics look just fine to my eyes, far from the unplayable mess you describe. I often find myself saying, "This is good enough for me," while playing and wonder what's the fuss with these new-fangled systems that brag about 1080p. If you're playing an excellent game, the graphics are just a means to an end and I often don't even notice them if it has captivated my attention like it should have.

      Having said that, I agree that there can be stinkers out there where it is obvious that the developers clearly didn't have the budget necessary to take advantage of some of the higher quality things you can do on the system. Bargain bin titles such as "Jeremy McGrath Supercross World" or "Warriors of Might and Magic" spring immediately to mind. That's not a criticism of the console, as you can find titles on almost any system that just stick out like a sore thumb and look sub-par regardless of the video monitor employed.

      "A garbled mess," that's "probably going to look terrible," you say? Hardly, however I'd be interested to know the make and model of your particular TV set, that I might avoid purchasing it in the future. As an aside, part of my livelihood revolves around calibrating high-end projectors and LCDs, so my eyes have been trained tolerably well to spot the deficiencies you describe, yet I see nothing remotely resembling such. I'll admit that I grew up with an Intellivision and ColecoVision, so admittedly I'm easily impressed. That a video gaming system maxes out at 480p does not in my book constitute a show-stopping limitation, and the fact that the Wii and PS2 are selling so well only seems to support that viewpoint.

    28. Re:Time to short? by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

      Firstly, I'm not speaking in terms of my general opinion as to the quality of the graphics so much as to their actual functional rendering. It looks, as best as I can tell, like when the PS2 has an SD title playing on an HD TV the rendering of polygons suffers greatly in terms of clarity. It is literally like taking one's glasses off.

      The offending game in this case was Dynasty Warriors 5. The first caveat I should make is that I do not have an component cable for my PS2. However, I don't see why a game without an HD mode should need one. I did not experience this with my Gamecube on any titles. I don't remember the model of my television off hand, but it's a Sony brand rear projection LCD.

      I think the issue is probably a game by game one. I'd assume if I had a title such as God of War it wouldn't like horrible. I'm not well aware of the number of HD titles for the PS2, but I'm willing to wager that a fair number of important ones aren't and will likely suffer as Dynasty Warriors 5 did (a good friend of mine simultaneously enjoys Guilty Gear on an HD TV, and loathes Ace Combat for the difference in visuals).

      The summary is that I haven't had any problems with Gamecube or Wii titles looking good on my HD TV (regardless of cable used), but my PS2 appears to have problems with some games.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    29. Re:Time to short? by catprog · · Score: 1

      The thing is while Sony's revenue is much higher they make very little profit of that.

      Nintendo make more profit for the same amount of revenue

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
  6. So? by lpangelrob · · Score: 1

    Unless either company decides to buy all its stock back or liquidate itself in the time period of three seconds... why does this matter?

    1. Re:So? by sssssss27 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it more or less just puts into perspective how well Nintendo is doing and how poorly Sony is doing. People aren't going to invest in a company that they don't have faith in.

    2. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you are wrong, Sony isn't doing poorly. Both companies are doing well.

    3. Re:So? by xero314 · · Score: 1

      People aren't going to invest in a company that they don't have faith in. I know I wouldn't invest in a company that was ranked 164th in last years fortune 2000 and happened to drop out of the top 10 market value in japan for mere moments. I would much rather invest in a company that was ranked 695th (down 75 from the previous year) in fortune and broke the top 10 market value in japan but couldn't maintain the rank through market closing.

      Seriously I'm not knocking Nintendo, but to imply that investors are going to lose faith in Sony is foolish.
    4. Re:So? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      It matters because it highlights how well Nintendo is doing compared to Sony, two companies from the same region dealing with gamers. Sony is a huge company with multiple divisions as large as their gaming division. Nintendo, which just does games, briefly surpassing Sony outlines that a lot of investors believe Nintendo to be a better company (considering how the Wii and DS are making money hand over fist, I'd have to agree with them).

    5. Re:So? by sssssss27 · · Score: 1

      I apologize. I didn't mean to say that people are going to lose faith in Sony just that stocks are a good way of telling how people feel about particular companies. It won't give you a long term picture of the way people feel about the company but more of a day to day reflection.

    6. Re:So? by joggle · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's true that a stock value only shows the current perception of a company's worth, not its long-term value. However, it is significant IMO that Nintendo is currently considered to be roughly worth the same as all of Sony which, by any measure, is a much larger company. Way to go Nintendo!

    7. Re:So? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The stock value is a prediction of the long term value of a company. So Nintendo having a market cap close to or the same as Sony even though it's a smaller company in every other way means that investors expect it's long term value to be similar to Sony's.

  7. Damn. by cromar · · Score: 1

    'Nuf said.

  8. and I remember people talking of Nintendos Demise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Funny thing is I remember people talking about Nintendo's demise because the Playstation2 and X-Box were outselling it by huge margins.

    However I always thought it was ammusing that even at the low numbers of sales, Nintendos bus. model makes a profit comparable to the competitors and there huge numbers.

  9. And the fan boys go nuts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you say "5 to 1 ratio" baby? Even Microsoft is trashing Sony... Hehehehe

  10. wow great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news Wal-Mart is still worth more than $200 billion, more than Sony and Nintendo combined. Quick, someone submit a Slashdot story.

    News for people who hate Sony 24/7/365. Stuff that matters.

  11. This means one thing... by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Nintendo stock is grossly overvalued right now. Good time to short it (unless of course, you happen to think that the Wii will singlehandedly replace all stereo, television, computer equipment, and all other consumer electronic on the planet, as opposed to simply being a fad game system). At a P/E of 53.78 there are a lot of really, really stupid people pretending to be investors out there.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:This means one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SNE's P/E is 53.59.

      So, what was your point again?

    2. Re:This means one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At a P/E of 53.78 there are a lot of really, really stupid people pretending to be investors out there.

      Yeah, it's called Wall Street.

  12. Wiis Still Selling As Fast As They Make 'Em by miller60 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here in NJ there are still console shoppers staking local game stores for new arrivals of the Wii. I was just at a local gaming store, and in the 10 minutes I was there, two shoppers came in and asked "if they had any in yet." No such luck. No inventory shortages for the PS3, tho.

    1. Re:Wiis Still Selling As Fast As They Make 'Em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a fucking loser!

      Give the bullshit a rest you pathetic little fanboy.

    2. Re:Wiis Still Selling As Fast As They Make 'Em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that really shows is that Nintendo doesn't have good enough hardware-production facilities.

      I like this to jab an irony stick into the eyes of fanboys.

    3. Re:Wiis Still Selling As Fast As They Make 'Em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I like this to jab an irony stick into the eyes of fanboys.

      If potatamoto is selling GBAs and that weird green thing is selling PS3s, you're right.

      Otherwise you make no sense at all.

    4. Re:Wiis Still Selling As Fast As They Make 'Em by CorSci81 · · Score: 1

      If you mean irony in that now the Wii is the supply constrained console, I might remind you that it's outselling the PS3 and Xbox360 in pretty much every region. Even supply constrained. From that perspective it seems they aren't performing so poorly production-wise.

    5. Re:Wiis Still Selling As Fast As They Make 'Em by LKM · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would be ironic if Nintendo didn't have the supplies. They do. They sell more than the 360 and the PS3. The problem is that they still don't have enough.

  13. You're forgetting something by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    All the other consoles are making a loss with each sale. The Wii makes Nintendo a profit with each sale. That profit can be invested in Nintendo's own development of games which are usually very good games.

    Sony will lose even more money once they lower the very high price of a PS3.

  14. Re:and I remember people talking of Nintendos Demi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, give the revisionism a fucking rest.

    No one ever talked about 'Nintendo's Demise'. And no one ever talked about the Xbox outselling the GameCube by a huge margin because...it didn't.

    Nintendo has been profitable due to their portable success, the GameCube and N64 were insignificant to Nintendo's overall profits over the past decade or so.

    But, hey, waggle, that's never going to get old...right?

  15. Just Another Manic Monday... by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A) Sorry, with a P/E of 31 (in times of plenty), this is a good example of an overinflated stock with unsustainable growth. (Sony's P/E is also high at 54 since investors are betting the PS3 will take off at some point -- I think they're right, but I still don't think it's a good buy.)

    B) If Nintendo doesn't either start putting out some quality titles, or convincing third parties to do it for them, the Wii excitement will quickly turn to Wiimorse. I really *want* to like this console, but I haven't found a game yet that holds my attention, or my son's, with the exception of Paper Mario, and the caveat that it was too difficult for him, and too easy/tedious for anyone with a little Mario experience under their belt. And why it doesn't support either the "classic controller" (when holding the Wiimote sideways is anything but ergonomic) or motion sensing (when that's the main selling point of the console) is beyond me. Anyway, yeah. More and better games -- and soon!

    1. Re:Just Another Manic Monday... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      A) Wow! Okay, I was looking for N's p/e ratio but didn't find it. While 31 is pretty high, I had assumed it would be higher that Sony's simply due to Sony being a much larger company with more revenue streams. That's not a good thing for Sony. I think both are headed for some stock readjustment.

      B) Not a big deal until Christmas, at least as far as N's prospects, revunues and share price are concerned. Personally I'm struggling to find enough time to play the games I have (Zelda, Trauma Center, Godfather, Paper Mario, and of course Wii Sports), so by the time I'm actually worried about new games all the 3rd parties who have suddenly jumped on board the wii bandwagon should have something to show. If not, I'll survive until Mario Galaxies and Metroid. *involuntary shudder of pleasure*

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Just Another Manic Monday... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have $250 in remorse than $700...

    3. Re:Just Another Manic Monday... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendo has some really big first party titles in the pipeline and increasing third party support. Even if console sales falter, they still stand to substantially increase their earnings as their attach rate increases. Given that, a P/E of 31 is still a bit high, but not unreasonably so.

    4. Re:Just Another Manic Monday... by MeanderingMind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A) Definately. It's absolutely incredible that a specialized business was able to overtake a multifaceted mega-giant, even for a moment. That said, this is probably the worst time to be investing in Nintendo stock. The Wii can be a wild success and dominate the generation and the stock still might recess down to a more sane level. If you didn't jump on the boat before the launch, it's a bad idea to hop on now. It might still go up, but it'll be amazing if it doesn't come down.

      B) Assuming Metroid Prime: Corruption, Super Smash Bros: Brawl and Super Mario Galaxy don't suck Nintendo should be good for 2007. I'm actually more concerned about 2008. Any developers who jumped on the Wii train after it charged out of the station will be releasing their offerings then. Chances are a number of them will be rushed in an attempt to hit the market as quickly as possible to take advantage of the currently weak library. I'm guessing there's going to be a large amount of "crap" from the rush and the unfamiliar control system.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    5. Re:Just Another Manic Monday... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Want people to take your post seriously instead of assuming you're a fanboy? Well then don't arbitrarily add $100 to the price of the thing you're biased against.

    6. Re:Just Another Manic Monday... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      2) So buy gamecube games, they use the gamecube controller which is very convenient and there probably exist plenty of games which your son can handle.

    7. Re:Just Another Manic Monday... by tepples · · Score: 1

      don't arbitrarily add $100 to the price of the thing you're biased against.

      As far as I know, PLAYSTATION 3 does not come with a game. My Wii came with five.

    8. Re:Just Another Manic Monday... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      If each of the games in Wii Sports counts as a game, then there are plenty of demos on the Playstation network for free download that would count equally. Either way, if assigning the value "$100" to Wii Sports isn't arbitrary I don't know what is.

    9. Re:Just Another Manic Monday... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's adding in the cost of a game. The Wii already comes with one. So the games don't quite cost $100, but it'll bring the price close to $700 than it is to $600.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    10. Re:Just Another Manic Monday... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you are so down on their P/E ratio. it just means investors expect their profits to go up, which in this case is reasonable. Their P/E ratio in November was around 40, so it is actually adjusting by increasing profits. This is still a good buy.

      --
      Qxe4
    11. Re:Just Another Manic Monday... by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      If each of the games in Wii Sports counts as a game, then there are plenty of demos on the Playstation network for free download that would count equally. Either way, if assigning the value "$100" to Wii Sports isn't arbitrary I don't know what is.

      I don't think the value of $100 is for WiiSports (If so, that is unreasonable). It is for a PS3 game ($60) since it doesn't have one bundled. That leaves $40 USD unaccounted for, and since they didn't round up for the Wii, I'll assume they didn't add VAT, or TAX, but maybe the HD cable for the PS3? (Since every version ships with SD composite cables)...

      And No. Demo's do not count equally against WiiSports. I wouldn't count it as 5 seperate games, but it is still better, and deeper than a "Demo"...

    12. Re:Just Another Manic Monday... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      It seems like people are going to great lengths to explain his clearly arbitrary price discrepancy. The cable? Give me a break. The PS3 is the only console I can think of since the 8-bit days that actually takes a standard video cable. You don't need any special Sony cable. Just a $4 HDMI cable does the trick.

      Disclaimer: I own both a Wii and a PS3, and I have $0 of buyers remorse. Though given the fact that I've been playing mostly PS2 games lately due to the lack of quality new releases for both systems, perhaps if I had less disposable income I'd have $750 in remorse. I certainly couldn't tell you that I like one of them better than the other though. They both have their strengths. If you don't have an HDTV, the Wii is the clear winner, but otherwise the PS3 definitely holds its own.

  16. Wii is fun with friends by Ponny · · Score: 1

    When having friends over, playing Playstation is fun and geeky. When having friends over, playing Wii is light-hearted and social. I got a Wii so my non-gamer friends can play along instead than getting their butts handed to them in Tekken round after round.

    1. Re:Wii is fun with friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, PS2 has Singstar. My friends split their time between wii play/sports and singstar.

  17. Wiimorse? I don't think so. Wii wins hands down by Drake42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not employed by any game company. If I had any financial motivation it would be toward MS winning since I can code games on their console using their open dev tools.

    That said, the Wii kicks and continues to kick everyone else's ass. Last night after playing so much golden axe and boxing that I couldn't stand it any more I decided "Hey I want to see some better graphics" I loaded up my 360, looked at the games I had available and none of them sounded all that appealing. I tried "Small Arms" and it just didn't look so amazing that it was more fun to play. Same with PocketBike. Considered loading up Dead Rising but didn't want to invest the time. Nothing else grabbed me so I went right back to the Wii for a few more rounds of tennis and went to bed.

    Like it or Hate it, the Wii has more staying power than any of the other consoles, graphics or not. You can say that Nintendo stock is over priced if you want, but people said that about google for ages and then their stock price rose anyway.

    People are fundamentally fed up with products that don't work / don't do what they claim / are so over-hyped that I have to tune them out just to think. The people of the world want simple services that actually and reliably work. Google and Nintendo are delivering that and so the market is rewarding them and will continue to do so for quite some time. I'm betting that I'll have a lot more fun playing Smash Brothers with my friends than playing Halo with whiny ass, vomit talking, on-line clans.

    I love my 360. And someday I'll buy a (lower cost) PS3 just for the eye candy. But when I want to play a game, I keep on going back to the Wii even after having it for quite a while.

  18. Re:and I remember people talking of Nintendos Demi by mqduck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Uh, give the revisionism a fucking rest.

    No one ever talked about 'Nintendo's Demise'.

    Dude, temper. I don't know where you were, but the demise of Nintendo was considered an inevitability almost the day after the Gamecube came out. Not because it sold horribly, but because all the video games happenings were on other systems. Few games, especially the interesting ones, came out on Gamecube. It seemed to guarantee that Nintendo wasn't going to do what it had to to retake the lead after the N64 sucked so hard. I certainly expected Nintendo to be gone by the next gen.
    --
    Property is theft.
  19. Re:Wiimorse? I don't think so. Wii wins hands down by Megane · · Score: 1

    If I had any financial motivation it would be toward MS winning since I can code games on their console using their open dev tools.

    Wow, where did you get that definition of "open" from? From Ebay, where "mint" is a flavor?

    You have to pay $99 a year, can't share with other people who don't also pay $99 a year, the tools themselves are certainly not open source, and no gnu-ware tools.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  20. yes, but A few questions and comments.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will nintendos stock markey cap ne enough to buy and power a beowolf cluster of Wii's?

    In Soviet Russia Wii Buys You

    All your market cap are belong to Nintedo..

    Damn nintedos market cap is as big as Go4tse Now

    I for one welcome our new market overlords

  21. Re:and I remember people talking of Nintendos Demi by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 1

    People always talk about how much the 64 supposedly sucked, but come on: Goldeneye, Ocarina of Time, Perfect Dark, Mario Kart 64, Paper Mario, Smash Bros...

    It had some of the best damn games of all time.

    --
    It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
  22. Re:and I remember people talking of Nintendos Demi by MeanderingMind · · Score: 3, Informative

    I distinctly remember people talking about Nintendo following the Sega model and refocusing only on games. These people were not necessarily informed, but discussion did happen on a semi-regular basis across interested forums. I believe it peaked around the PSP's launch.

    At the time the DS was moving slowly, and the PSP's launch was impressive. The "Revolution" was a long ways off, and its features pure speculation. Given they were last in the console market (by market share) and the PSP looked set to steal the handheld market at that time, threads hailing or lamenting the demise of Nintendo as a hardware company were not uncommon. Despite the Gamecube making pure profit, it was hard to imagine that Nintendo could continue making consoles if their market kept shrinking.

    People also talked about the Xbox "vastly" outselling the Gamecube. Why? Fanboys of the time would cite specific regions, months, etc. to slant the facts. Just because it was wrong doesn't mean it wasn't spoken.

    As a last note, the Gamecube and N64 profits were significant even if they may have been less than the Gameboy Advance (I'm not going to commit either way without numbers). Assuming a mere $1 profit was made on each console sold, that's $50 million in hardware sales. That's distributed over 10 years, but we're making about the harshest assumption possible about systems that were never sold at loss during their time; We're also ignoring software sales, accessories and licensing fees.

    --
    Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
  23. Re:Wiimorse? I don't think so. Wii wins hands down by MorpheousMarty · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree, that is why I have a Wii and a PC. When I want to game, and not waste my life tuning settings, I play Wii. When I want the best graphics possible I use my PC. The Xbox and the PS3 both feel like PC's I'm not allowed to tune to my liking, and for that I would only buy them if they had some GREAT games for them, which eventually they will, but as you said, nothing is grabbing me now so I play Resident Evil 4 on the Wii and am more pleased with it than everything but God of War II.

  24. Not to forget NGC (and NDS) games... by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Also since it can play gamecube games for the people who already haven't owned a gamecube, and I guess that are plenty, there are quite a few titles for the gamecube out there aswell. Some RPGs (Baten Kaitos, err.. damn I suck at names :D, oh well, there are a few which seems nice anyway), both metroids, smash football, paper mario thousand years door, uhm, and probably more ;/.

    Thought I guess the best consoles to own right now is the PS2 and the DS since both are cheaps and have lots of games. Personally I will wait with the Wii until it's cheaper, and I might get a PS3 aswell when it is much cheaper.

    1. Re:Not to forget NGC (and NDS) games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does DS get the parenthetical treatment when it's the cornerstone of the company's success?

  25. Re:and I remember people talking of Nintendos Demi by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    It sure didn't have quantity, but it had the quailty. Over the 4 years that anybody owns a console, before moving to the next generation, they shouldn't need any more than 10 games. I don't play every night, but I play a couple times a week, and 10 games would easily last me for 4 years. I'm still playing Mario Kart Double Dash on my Wii because that is just such a great game. I also downloaded Mario Kart 64. I think the Gamecube also had a lot of quality, although it didn't have tons of games. The 2 Metroids, Zelda WW and TP, Mario Kart, Super Smash Bros. Mario Party, Super Monkey Ball (The new one is awesome on the Wii), and many others. I don't care if other systems have 1000 games, when they all suck.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  26. Re:Waggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My brother is a SONY fan-boi. He has over 100 titles combined for his PS1 and PS2. He bought a PS3 in March when it was released over here (NZ) and still hasn't gotten a game for it.

    Thats the real proof - there aint one AAA game out for the PS3 and its been 8 months now.

  27. Re:and I remember people talking of Nintendos Demi by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

    Um, something doesn't have to be true for people to talk about it. Plenty of people have claimed the XBox outsold the GameCube by a huge margin. They're just wrong (or exaggerating, depending on the person).

  28. Re:Wiimorse? I don't think so. Wii wins hands down by Turey · · Score: 1

    I believe the concept you're failing to grasp is that of "relative". Show me where you can get a Wii or PS3 Dev kit for under $99 on the open market.

  29. It's true. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Even if the anecdote is a fabrication. WTF is up with Big-N's production line because it is utter bullshit that I cannot pick up a system anywhere. I WANT TO PLAY MANHUNT 2 DAMNIT. AND I WANT THE EXTRA GRUESOME DEATH SCENES.
    And I am going to play it on a shitty SD television through a 3rd party coax converter tuned to the wrong channel and the coax sheath freyed so it has a realistic gritty snow effect making the game even more INTENSE.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  30. Re:Wiimorse? I don't think so. Wii wins hands down by revengebomber · · Score: 1

    Ahem.

    All the Linux you can handle, and even without the GPU it's more power than you'll ever need for a homebrew game. If you're a small developer, the Wii devkits are fairly cheap ($5000 or so, but I'm probably wrong here).

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  31. Re:and I remember people talking of Nintendos Demi by mqduck · · Score: 1

    It had some good games, sure. Mario 64 is one of my favorite games of all time. But everything interesting was happening on the PSX (Resident Evil and Final Fantasy VII to give two examples) after the initial wave of N64 games. The reason for this was hardware. That's why I said the N64 itself sucked.

    --
    Property is theft.
  32. Stock by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

    how much higher can the stock reasonably go?

    I don't know, that sounds like one of those statements that come back to bite you in the ass :P
    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:Stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're both wrong. If there's one thing you can be sure about, it's that the stock market will go up. Dow 36,000, baby!

  33. Re:and I remember people talking of Nintendos Demi by LKM · · Score: 1

    I read more than a few articles and comments from people calling for Nintendo to do a Sega and become a third-party software developer after the Cube tanked. Actually, right up to E3 where people first got to play with the Wii...

  34. N64 sucked, PS1 sucked more by LKM · · Score: 1

    By today's standards, the N64 is a pretty sucky console, but really, there's no comparison to the suckiness of the PS1. The PS1 had two things in its favour: It was cheap, and games had a lot of storage space. Other than that, it was a mediocre console, especially compared to the N64 with the memory enhancement. The N64 had no loading time, came with an analog controller, had four controller ports, could display much better 3D graphics, had a rumble pack for the controller...

    The N64 sucked, but not as badly as the PS1.

  35. Nintendo doesn't need "hardcore" games by LKM · · Score: 1

    If Nintendo doesn't either start putting out some quality titles, or convincing third parties to do it for them, the Wii excitement will quickly turn to Wiimorse. I really *want* to like this console, but I haven't found a game yet that holds my attention

    But people didn't buy the Wii for "games that hold their attention" such as Zelda or Super Paper Mario. They bought Wiis for Wii Sports. Nintendo doesn't actually need "hardcore" games (although a few are coming out). What they need is a few strong follow-ups for Wii Sports. And they have these, too - Wii Fitness and Wii Music are looking extremely interesting.

  36. Re:Wiimorse? I don't think so. Wii wins hands down by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

    Like it or Hate it, the Wii has more staying power than any of the other consoles, graphics or not.

    I'd appreciate it if you didn't present completely subjective opinions as hard fact. I'm buying a 360 next week because it has tons of released and upcoming games that interest me. The Wii has exactly one (Metroid Prime 3), so the Wii really doesn't interest me and neither does its controller.

    I love my 360. And someday I'll buy a (lower cost) PS3 just for the eye candy. But when I want to play a game, I keep on going back to the Wii even after having it for quite a while.

    I really question the logic of buying a 360 and PS3 if you don't intend to play any games with them. There are cheaper alternatives for playing HD-DVD and Blu-Ray discs.
  37. Re:Wiimorse? I don't think so. Wii wins hands down by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

    So you don't want to waste your life tuning settings (which really means that your game's performance is not satisfactory and you have to fiddle around with the settings, defrag your hard-disk and update your drivers), but you don't like it that the PS3 and 360 don't allow you to tune settings (which is of course completely unnecessary with consoles)?

    The fact that you don't need to spend hours tweaking settings on a 360 is a good thing.

  38. Grandma is 133t by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

    I think one of the strongest selling points for the Wii is that there are modchips already available. And you can download and burn games onto DVDRs.


    Yeah, because all those grandmothers buying the Wii are l33t h@x0r pirates. Get a life. Software to hardware sales ratios started out better than 3-to-1, and I think have gotten better since. People are buying the Wii and buying games, not pirating them.
    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    1. Re:Grandma is 133t by blackicye · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because all those grandmothers buying the Wii are l33t h@x0r pirates. Get a life.


      While we're on the subject of ad hominem attacks.. Get your head out of your ass, Nintendo fanboi.

      You honestly believe grandmothers are the ones who are wiping these consoles off the shelves?

      I'm sure the wii has the largest following of elderly gamers of any console to date, but you think the sales to the older folks even accounts for 5% of the wii sales? I think you're deluded.

      And yes, people are pirating wii games, as well as Xbox360, PSP, Gamecube, PC and games from every single platform that has had its DRM bypassed. Just because you're not doing it doesn't mean its not prevalent.

      Refer to today's news if necessary.
    2. Re:Grandma is 133t by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the wii has the largest following of elderly gamers of any console to date, but you think the sales to the older folks even accounts for 5% of the wii sales?
      No, but I think the vast vast majority of Wii sales have been to non-tech-savvy users. I used "Grandma" as the extreme example of this, but the soccer moms buying this for their kids aren't buying it to modchip it either. "Grandma" is also personally a funny example to me since recently a discussion popped up on a GDC mailing list about an article by CliffyB's brother about how "non gamers" are buying the Wii in droves and "ruining" the industry. So it's rather amusing to get "Teh grandmothers!!!1!!" from one side and "Teh hAx0rs!!!!1!!" from the other side when discussing who's buying the damn thing.

      I think you're deluded.
      Wait, which one of us said "I think one of the strongest selling points for the Wii is that there are modchips already available. And you can download and burn games onto DVDRs." and then went on to imply that hardware sales are moved by ease of piracy? And I'm deluded? 99% of the user base of the Wii is not knowledgeable enough or interested enough to pirate games for it. Anyone who thinks otherwise is following the same old tired Slashdot pattern of assuming the average Slashdot commenter has anything in common with the average consumer.

      And yes, people are pirating wii games, as well as Xbox360, PSP, Gamecube, PC and games from every single platform that has had its DRM bypassed. Just because you're not doing it doesn't mean its not prevalent.
      Yes, I'm well aware. But such people have always represented an almost unnoticeable minority of purchasers of these systems--with the exception of perhaps the Dreamcast, I suppose...
      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  39. Re:and I remember people talking of Nintendos Demi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I roughly agree with you on the 10 games thing - I obviously play games a lot more than you and get 1-2 new ones a month but a console only needs 10 good games to justify its purchase. Trouble is some of us are a bit picky about what genre those good games are in, e.g. I don't care for team sports games or 2D fighters so Mario Strikers and Smash Bros aren't my cup of tea. I can see they're well made and all that, just don't like them. I can absolutely see that someone could find the gamecube library wanting - if it hadn't had say Eternal Darkness/Resi 4 or the Pikmins it would have been under the 10 threshold for me personally.

  40. Re:and I remember people talking of Nintendos Demi by charizardpal · · Score: 1

    Agreed> I was surprised when Nintendo decided to release the wii since they were sucking so bad last gen. Thought they'd run out of dough like Sega. The wii is selling quite a bit (which wasn't too surprising considering the price, image, little motion-detecting gimic, target audience, and lack of good competition-Sony is expensive, and Microsoft has few games.) I just didn't expect them to come out number one this gen based on their recent history and its a bit of a turn around...

    --
    Stab, slash, its all in the mind! If you want to take it....you're gonna find///
  41. Re:and I remember people talking of Nintendos Demi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well gee, ranger. I have a whole shelf full of Gamecube games and only a handful of PS2 ones, and I had a ton of fun last generation. I'll agree that most of the game hype was focused on the PS2 and the XBox, but so were most of the biggest letdowns (Metal Gear Solid 2, Final Fantasy X, Fable, etc. most people cite Wind Waker but I enjoyed it), and the biggest cheese fests (Extreme Beach Volleyball? come on..)

    I'm really curious to hear what your definition of "interesting" is.

  42. Wii doen't need 100s of games... by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1

    The Wii isn't marketed to the hardcore gamer like the PS3 and XBox360 are. I know people who got their console last year and are still happy playing the Wii Sports game that came with it.

    The thing that will kill Wii sales the quickest are too many crappy games. If Nintendo promised 380 games this year, I'd sell my stocks as fast as I could. If you want to know why, look up what caused the great video game crash of the 1980's (it wasn't just ET ;)).

    Even if only 1 or 2 good games come out a year for the Wii, it will still be selling very well.

    --
    Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!