Slashdot Mirror


Will Linux Win the Next Presidential Election?

i_like_spam writes "Douglas Karr has posted an interesting breakdown, complete with bar charts, of the operating systems and server software used by the websites for 23 declared and undeclared presidential candidates. The breakdown shows that there is nearly an equal split between Linux and Windows servers among the whole candidate pool. More interesting, all of the Democratic candidates except for Hillary favor Linux or FreeBSD. 69% of the Republican candidates, in contrast, prefer Windows. Is this preference for OSS or Microsoft a true reflection of differing political philosophies? And, more importantly, will Linux win the next election?"

18 of 453 comments (clear)

  1. Even More Shocking by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    69% of the Republican candidates, in contrast, prefer Windows. What's even more shocking is that the other 31% of the Republican candidates are running Ubuntu Christian Edition while it turns out in the end that the very core of their operating system is the same kernel that Ubuntu Satanic Edition runs on.

    Makes you think, doesn't it?

    And don't even get me started on Hillary, there's solid proof that her servers resolve to the IP address 66.66.66.66 and that good packets go in but only packets with the evil flag flipped to '1' come out.

    I suppose that's politicians for you, though. 'Does not compute' with them, can't pretend we're living in a society where everyone feels equally represented without them.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Even More Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't forget also: Ubuntu Satanic Edition uses the text editor of the beast, Vi Vi Vi.

  2. Here's one for Hillary by ringfinger · · Score: 3, Funny
  3. Weak by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is one of the weaker examples of "News for nerds. Stuff that matters." that I've seen in a while...

  4. Intelligent Design? Or Evolution? by ringfinger · · Score: 5, Funny
    Did Ubuntu Christian Edition come fully formed as a distro? Or did it evolve?

    These stories of a Finnish student designing Linux must be garbage. We all know that Linux is too complex to have evolved over time to its current state. It could only have been created by an Intelligent 'designer'

    1. Re:Intelligent Design? Or Evolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "You're "joke" is pretty flawed. Linux does not have the ability to replicate itself without human intervention; therefore, it does not have the ability to evolve."

      Last time I checked, I didn't have the ability to replicate myself without human intervention either :-) :-)

    2. Re:Intelligent Design? Or Evolution? by njko · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like evolution but i prefer Thunderbird

      --
      \n.\n
    3. Re:Intelligent Design? Or Evolution? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Funny

      Luckily, God designed me smarter than Creationists....

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  5. so let me get this straight... by jense · · Score: 2, Funny

    John McCain (for example) took time out of his preparation for upcoming primaries to chair an internal commitee on whether or not to use Windows or Linux servers. Furthermore, he took into consideration the political, secretive, subliminal implications of this choice and made a strategic move that would appease constituents. Or maybe he just asked an old buddy to coordinate his web site.

    --
    Touting MyEclipse AJAX Tools
  6. Re:What About Independents, Libertarians, socialis by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Plan 9, Minuette, SkyOS

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  7. Giant douche runs Linux, Turd sandwich Windows. by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Used rubber runs BSD.

    Vote Giant douche.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  8. Re:Given Diebold... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 5, Funny

    Given the pervalance of Diebold machines, I'd say just about anyone could win the next presidental election.

    That's exactly the kind of uncertainty that Diebold's backers hope to eliminate.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  9. Re:What About Independents, Libertarians, socialis by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, according to Netcraft, the libertarians, communists and independent parties's sites are all running Linux. The American Green party is running FreeBSD.
    So... Netcraft confirms American democracy* is dead?

    *of the people, for the people, yada yada.
    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  10. Re:No and No by Soko · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you honestly believe that a candidate's webserver reflects their political leanings, you're sadly delusional. Sadly delusional? Sadly??? Dude, I like my delusions, which is why they're still around.

    /me goes to look for grandeur...

    Soko
    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  11. Re:Good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thousands of people die worldwide due to cigarettes each day of every year. Why haven't we invaded North Carolina?

  12. Re:What would Cthulhu use? by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cthulhu needs no operating system.... he just plain wins the election
    I think you're confusing him with Chuck Norris.
    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  13. Re:Ron Paul & Linux by Khaed · · Score: 3, Funny

    If Ron Paul wins I won't have to buy gas anymore because I'll simply catch a ride with a flying pig to work.

    Seriously, Ron Paul is the right version of Kucinich. He stands about the same chance of winning the Republican nomination as Hillary does of winning a beauty pageant.

  14. Let there be Source... by coren2000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... and it was good.