Slashdot Mirror


Will Linux Win the Next Presidential Election?

i_like_spam writes "Douglas Karr has posted an interesting breakdown, complete with bar charts, of the operating systems and server software used by the websites for 23 declared and undeclared presidential candidates. The breakdown shows that there is nearly an equal split between Linux and Windows servers among the whole candidate pool. More interesting, all of the Democratic candidates except for Hillary favor Linux or FreeBSD. 69% of the Republican candidates, in contrast, prefer Windows. Is this preference for OSS or Microsoft a true reflection of differing political philosophies? And, more importantly, will Linux win the next election?"

7 of 453 comments (clear)

  1. Who ..... by moseman · · Score: -1, Troll

    Who the fuck cares.

    --
    Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to think "profiling is worse than the slaughter of innocent people..."
  2. Democrats are running the Fairness Edition... by tjstork · · Score: 0, Troll

    Every sentence you type in Democratic Linux invokes an automatic grammar checker which injects the opposite point of view.

    --
    This is my sig.
  3. Re:Doubt it by aichpvee · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm sure the majority of republicans run it because they're so in bed with big corporations so they're obviously helping out their republican buddies at microsoft. There's also the chance that a few of the candidates picked it because their tech guys are also republicans and thus idiots.

    Not sure what accounts for republicans who aren't using windows. Perhaps they outsourced their hosting to India?

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  4. Re:What would Cthulhu use? by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... And like Cthulhu, you have to be a Great Old One yourself to get that joke.

    --
    Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
  5. Not Random by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's the point. It's *not* random.
    It's no surprise that the republicans are heavy Windows,
    they know where their bread is buttered.

    What is interesting is that even some of the republicans
    are *not* using Windows. Watch for that to change over
    the next year, either by the candidate dropping out of
    the race, or converting the website over to Windows.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  6. Re:Intelligent Design? Or Evolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    before you start trying to deride the intellict of others who disagree with you

    Intellect? A creationist or an ID-proponent with an intellect? You must be joking.

  7. Re:Ron Paul & Linux by Khaed · · Score: -1, Troll

    Wow. I think you're serious. Okay: The Republican nominee is going to be Giuliani, Romney, or Fred Thompson.

    And I don't think Hillary will even get the nomination. She's like a shrill bitchy school teacher. Politics aside, she's just grating. I don't know why Democrats like annoying women -- are Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Diane Fienstien, Harry Reid? What the fuck is this? These bitches are annoying. (If I could think of a Republican woman other than Laura Bush, I'd make a comment there, but the Republicans know their women are irritating and don't put them on a national platform.)

    74% may want the war over, but a great deal of those want a victory.

    Of course, if it were up to me, none of them would get the presidency, because none of them have come out against the DMCA and eternal copyrights, none of them have made any comments reflecting any understanding of technology, and they're all old and smell like mothballs and cabbage farts.