Slashdot Mirror
GPL 3 Launch Date Announced
Joe Blakesley writes "Today, the Free Software Foundation announced that version 3 of the GNU General Public License will be released on Friday, June 29 at noon (EDT). Live video footage of the GPL's unveiling by Richard M. Stallman will be available as a stream on the FSF's website."
GPL v3 + iPhone in one day = collective nerdgasm?
Right, because otherwise the servers would be flooded by people clamouring to see the latest GPL! But stick with the Apple story, it will make people feel better :) (Its not our fault, people just like dumb ol' apple, that's all!)
I mean, it isn't a physical object. Print it out and frame it? Throw copies into the crowd? A reading by Stallman himself (followed by a license signing)?
Yes, they use video streaming sometimes. "Often" is to strong a word, but they have been doing it more as of late due to the GPLv3 process. To sum it up, it's Vorbis and Theora.
I don't know about anyone else, but I plan to camp out all night in front of the FSF so I can be the first to get a copy of the final version of the GPLv3. Then I'm going to sell it on eBay.
The W3 does not recommend hyperlinks on verb phrases.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
"No retroactive effects on the MS deal. More lines than GPLv2. Lame."
Excellent news!
I'm curious about when Sun plans to GPL 3 Java, OpenSolaris, along with ZFS, DTrace, and hopefully NetBeans.
This space left intentionally blank.
I'm going to wait for SP1 before I upgrade.
Actually, there are. Novell got let off easy in a way because FSF feels it's more important to use the Microsoft "coupons" to go after Microsoft's remaining patent rights with GPL3 (after doctrine of Laches, etc. has already cost MS most of those rights). But I don't think Microsoft would be very happy about Novell using GPL3 software because of that. How this plays out will be interesting.
Bruce
Bruce Perens.
Gotta update my tattoo, Which was the GPL-2, But from the looks of v3, Should be hours of agony!
technical writing / development
Well, how does it hurt it? I mean, its the release of a new software license.. it's unusual that there are any festivities at all. Do you really think they have much hopes for major press coverage?
I'm glad that some people didn't feel the need to clear their schedule because a new phone is being released. I'm glad I don't spend much time surfing the internet on the weekends; I'll remain unexposed to the epicenter of the hype.
"'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."
That is the Affero GPL, a separate license.
Bruce Perens.
There are some things in the GPLv3 that will eventually blow up on them, doing this to hide the publicity amongst the Apple fanfare is just par for the course.
You seem to be implying that Stallman is announcing this on June 29th so he can hide behind the big iPhone rollout. I haven't met Stallman in person, but nothing I've heard indicates that he would ever try to hide one of his announcements. He has a lot of ego invested in the GPL. My guess is he's deliberately announcing it on June 29th because he'll be able to leverage the iPhone launch. I could see him calling attention to the iPhone and the perils of hardware companies and content providers limiting our options.
He's going to try and pull a judo move on the 29th.
Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
Bruce
Bruce Perens.
Ha, fuck you! I'm going to give it away for nothing.
No, they dropped that from the later drafts of GPLv3. The FSF recently released a draft of the Affero GPL, which at first glance is pretty much the same as GPLv3, except that it does have the web distribution clause. From the FSF rationale documents, it sounds like they thought it tricky to get right, and probably thought they'd rather get GPLv3 out first and worry about the Affero part later.
"When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
You don't need to agree with the GPL to use the software. For an end-user that just uses the software the GPLv3 doesn't change anything, and most of it doesn't apply anyway, since its focus is on redistribution, code availability and code change. The GPL is however important for people that develop the software and that is why the GPLv3 is important.
They probably meddle and make random changes because of the whiners.
Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
They could just use Icecast from Xiph (the same people who develop the standards for Ogg, Vorbis, Theora, FLAC, XSPF, etc.) I believe.
'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
Trust me to miss any reference to pop culture. Not enough time in my life. Not even enough sleep, this time.
Bruce Perens.
But you don't seem to realize why RMS differs. So do compare that ESR essay to "Why "Open Source" misses the point of Free Software" which, among other things, asks you to consider what is being proposed by the two movements and to give each movement their due. The free software movement isn't just about making software (in fact a lot of people in the free software community aren't programmers at all). The way you frame the issue, it seems that everyone getting along is fine so long as we all choose to call everything "open source" and toss aside the pursuit of freedom and social solidarity that are at the heart of the free software movement (and which the open source movement was built not to talk about).
Digital Citizen
Two people with birthdays on June 29 - thus proving Slashdot has 730 (and a half) users.
Hey, do I actually have to care about the FSF to get one of those c00l fsf.org email addresses?
n _fsf? or https://www.fsfe.org/en/fsfeuser/register/(set)/1 if you're at all interested).
No, not at all. Just to pay them monthly, you can otherwise loathe them.
I need a new permanent email provider
Well, they are just redirects, 5 in total IIRC.
and fsf.org would be teh shizznikegnite. Think of all the geek cred.
I don't need to think, I expererience it everyday. I just flash it and the kids just go, like, awesome ma nizzle. Fo' shizzle. (more seriously though, see https://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom/joi
How can you unveil something that's been through a year of public drafting?
If you want to use software, you must have software to use. If you want to have software to use, there must be a way to develop it. The GPL has been the "Constitution" enabling the development of a vast amount of really useful software; indeed, the majority of Free-libre / open source software (FLOSS) uses the GPL. And people are finally realizing that most FLOSS is commercial software; it's no longer exclusively "just a hobby". Before the GPL, the only ways of creating software were complete proprietary control (often by a company intent on preventing you from switching) or public domain/BSDish licenses (which sometimes works very well, but sometimes get sucked into proprietary projects often enough to die or live only on life support). So yes, if you wish to be able to use software in the future, the GPL is important; it establishes a viable method of making the software that people would like to use. In fact, it's been extraordinarily effective at doing so.
Even you don't write code yourself, you can still hire someone to write or change code. So the GPL provides additional capabilities to users, even if the user can't write code him/herself. And even if you use proprietary software, GPL'ed software has had a profound impact on limiting the costs of much of that software, which is also great for end-users (and again matters to them).
Here's an analogy - that statement is like saying that agriculture doesn't matter because many people aren't farmers. But non-farmers must eat too! Having viable methods to grow food - and a competitive system to lower costs and raise quality - are still of vital interest to the users of products from farmers. Unless you want to stop eating.
- David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)