Slashdot Mirror


MIT Team Designs a New, Sleek, Skintight Spacesuit

iamdrscience writes "MIT aeronautics professor Dava Newman has designed a new spacesuit along with her colleague, Jeff Hoffman and a group of students. This is far sleeker and lighter weight than the suits used by astronauts today, promising greater mobility than the traditional bulky suits of today which can weigh 300lbs or more. Instead of gas pressurization, the new prototype BioSuit employs "mechanical counter-pressure" in the form of skin-tight layers wrapped around the body."
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2007/biosuit-0716.html

7 of 383 comments (clear)

  1. Sci-Fi correlation by perlhacker14 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it just me, or does this sound like something out of Sci-Fi? Sleek, skintight, spacesuits? Anyway... Finally! A redesign of the spacesuits. This has been coming for a while, and most people probably should have forseen a new design. What amazes me is how futuristic and sci-fi this sounds... or is it just progress? What ever the case, this is real progress and innovation.

  2. Re:But why .... by taniwha · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I swear that's Thatcher

  3. Another plug for the metric system by A+non-mouse+Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Masses 300 lbs, weighs nothing, but still no friend of mobility.
    Somebody who does this for a living will have to back me up (or shut me up), but isn't pounds (as in lbs.) a measurement of weight, as in the English-system unit of mass times the earth's gravitational acceleration, unlike the metric unit, grams, which is strictly-speakly a measurement of mass-only (as in free of gravitational acceleration)?

    And on that note, how is having 300 lbs (or mass-equivalent) less gear going to keep you from hopping off the moon into outerspace forever? Didn't the extra mass come in handy to keep people from flying away?
    --
    libertarian: (n) socially liberal, financially conservative; neither left, nor right.
  4. PHYSICS: Why skin tight may be a bad idea by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm thinking this has some inherent drawbacks. With gas pressure regulation, the pressure inside the suite is the same regardless of whether you are inside the space capsule (at 16psi ambient pressure) or outside (at zero PSI ambient). It seems to me that if this thing is mechanically applying 16 PSI in vacuum then it must apply 32 PSI when inside the capsule. That's going to raise your blood pressure. Not by enough to be harmful, (after all scuba divers have the same). But more importantly, if you take our helmet off now you suffocate inside the space capusle. You suffocate first because you cannot physcally open your lungs with 32 PSI pressing on them in a 16psi atmosphere. And secondly even if you solved that, then you still have the problem of the 32 psi pressure making it harder to dissolve gas in your blood, so your cells cant get air or release CO2. And finally, if you took your kemet off then you have the extra 16 psi in your bloodstream pushing against the back of your eye-balls.

    I wonder how they dealt with that?

    One speculation might be that they made the suit not stretchy but just a fixed size that EXACTLY fits you. This way you have no pressure until you expand into the suit which then applies a counter force.

    However I cant' see that actually being possible, and having any flexibility. If You expand even slightly your blood pressure will drop. it would have to fit everywhere exactly, down to the gonads. cause you'd get enormous swelling in any place there was no counter-force.

    Finally, I can't see how this works around your head. If the suit is not pressurized then how do you maintain 16psi pressure on the face? Sure you could have the person breath through a regulator. But the face itself would not have pressure on it.

    Obviously I don't understand how this thing works or can work.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:PHYSICS: Why skin tight may be a bad idea by Alioth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, ignoring for now that atmospheric pressure is 14.7 psi, not 16 psi - there's no need for the suit or the occupant to actually be at sea level atmospheric pressure. In fact, it may be undesirable, as it means you need more powerful life support systems - more weight, more complexity.

      The human body is fine at 0.2 atmospheres so long as it's getting enough oxygen. While in the spacecraft without a helmet, with 0.2 atm (less than 4 psi) being pressed against your chest might be uncomfortable, it's not going to kill you.

  5. Life imitates... anime o_O? by shish · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just a few weeks back there was some anime / subliminal propoganda sponsored by the japanese equivalent of NASA, and they had suits which looked just like that :O

    (That series also introduced me to reverse polish calculators, and it's true, I can no longer stand to use a regular calculator; RPN just seems so much more elegant...)

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  6. NASA learns marketing from sci-fi by r00t · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's sex appeal.

    Remember, we could be sending robots everywhere for the price of this. Science is not what NASA cares about. NASA cares about their budget. Going to Mars sells well. Going to Mars in skin-tight suits sells better.