Slashdot Mirror


IPhones Flooding Wireless LAN At Duke

coondoggie sends us to a Network World story, as is his wont, about network problems at Duke University in Durham, N.C. that seem to be related to the iPhone. "The Wi-Fi connection on Apple's recently released iPhone seems to be the source of a big headache for network administrators at Duke. The built-in 802.11b/g adapters on several iPhones periodically flood sections of the school's wireless LAN with MAC address requests, temporarily knocking out anywhere from a dozen to 30 wireless access points at a time. Campus network staff are talking with Cisco, the main WLAN provider, and have opened a help-desk ticket with Apple. But so far, the precise cause of the problem remains unknown. 'Because of the time of year for us, it's not a severe problem,' says Kevin Miller, assistant director, communications infrastructure, with Duke's Office of Information Technology. 'But from late August through May, our wireless net is critical. My concern is how many students will be coming back in August with iPhones? It's a pretty big annoyance, right now, with 20-30 access points signaling they're down, and then coming back up a few minutes later. But in late August, this would be devastating.'" So far, the communication with Apple has been "one-way."

8 of 441 comments (clear)

  1. Critical? by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But from late August through May, our wireless net is critical.

    Wireless? Critical? Dumb.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Critical? by gravos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent up. My university has gone to all-wireless too, and it's completely retarded because it's so unreliable. **A MICROWAVE OVEN IN THE KITCHEN KNOCKS EVERYONE OFF THE NETWORK**, for christ's sake, and that's to say nothing of intentional disruption.

    2. Re:Critical? by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes it is dumb. Run some cable and leave the wireless for students with laptops and shit. Cables are the best method for mission critical things anyways.

      Yeah. Unless you're a university, and your "mission critical things" (remember the definition of "mission"?) include things like ... ohhh, I dunno ... students with laptops and shit?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  2. Bet you 10 to 1... by g-san · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...it's their network. Why are we only hearing about it here? They probably have a loop in their network or some kind of ARP forwarding active they don't understand. You would think something like this would get caught early on in testing with the iPhone, this kind of problem tends to stand out. I also doubt the iPhone has enough horsepower to pump out 10Mbps of ARP requests, sounds like a networking device is sourcing these packets.

  3. MAC address REQUEST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but there's something a little OFF here. No wireless hardware requests a MAC address. It may use MAC to authenticate to a table, but it goes for a DHCP lease.

    Slashdot...sigh...

  4. Re:Interesting problem by beheaderaswp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I want to know is what is a "MAC address request". I've never seen one. I've seen DHCP requests, ARP requests, even AARP requests- but not a MAC address request.

    I didn't know MAC addresses were assigned dynamically.

    But I'm over 40- what do I know?

    --
    Another consultant who stuck it out.

    "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
  5. Re:Taking out Cisco Router with ARP Floods? by technormality · · Score: 5, Insightful

    18,000 arp requests a second? Smells like a spanning tree loop to me. Thats where I would start looking. Could be a single AP bridging the same vlan with spanning tree disabled. Anyone roaming into into its range could cause havoc.

  6. Re:Most likely a Cisco bug - firmware upgrade need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In reality, it seems that your router tends to substitute its own MAC address for non-local ARP entries (since all non-local packets go through the router, you really don't have to know what the real MAC address is)

    Say what? The last time I saw something equally screwy it was a Cisco LightStream 1010 (ATM switch) running LANE (LAN Emulation) that played no part in layer 3 at all, yet it was still building up an ARP table of every IP datagram that flowed through it (and wondered why it kept running out of memory).

    If you send out an ARP for an "unknown address", you'll get no response - it's not up to the router to respond on behalf of "non-local packets", it's up to the client to determine that the destination is non-local (by using the network and mask together) then picking a suitable gateway (usually default) for sending the packet on its way.

    Therefore, the client already knows it needs to send the non-local/unknown-addressed packet through the router so it explicitly ARPs for the router's MAC address (if not already cached) - nothing to do with trying to get the MAC of the remote destination.