Slashdot Mirror


Northrop Grumman to own Scaled Composites

Dolphinzilla writes "According to Space.com, Northrop Grumman Corporation agreed on July 5 to increase its stake in Burt Rutan's Scaled Composites (designers of Space Ship One, Proteus) from 40 percent to 100 percent. They have purchased the company outright, marking a new future for the space pioneering firm. 'Scaled Composites currently is working with Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic venture on a vehicle designated for now as SpaceShipTwo, which would carry two pilots and six paying passengers into suborbital space for a few minutes of weightlessness. The company also is building a new carrier aircraft, dubbed WhiteKnight2, that will carry SpaceShipTwo to an altitude of 15 kilometers before releasing it to soar to suborbital space. The two companies last year formed a joint venture called the Spaceship Company to build the new vehicles.'"

27 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. This is unfortunate by Zebra_X · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While this is probably great for Scaled from a cash perspective - it is truly saddening for the space industry. Scaled has been for nearly the last decade pushing into areas where private firms have not been able to go in the past. They innovated and created a workable solution for "mass" sub orbital flights. Ultimately the next steps are going to be push to LEO - and beyond. I fear however that the innovation and creative problem solving that has defined Scaled to date is no longer going to continue. Despite the company's best wishes - they will no longer have the ability to take the risks and make the decisions necessary to continue innovating.

    We will most likley see Scaled develop into a robust provider for Sub Orbital flights but I doubt that they will attempt to push further.

    1. Re:This is unfortunate by cyclone96 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I fear however that the innovation and creative problem solving that has defined Scaled to date is no longer going to continue.

      I'm not sure it's quite as bad as you fear, it's possible that Northrup-Grumman will continue in that tradition.

      The challenge with these very small, innovative space companies is that their model (which is a small group of really smart guys working very hard without a lot of support overhead) can only scale up so far. At some point the products they are creating get complex enough where you hit critical mass and start needing groups to specialize in things like analysis, integration, customer support, systems integration, etc.

      This is what large aerospace companies are good at. You might call this a bloated support structure, but it's the only way that the industry has found to develop really big, complex, and profitable aircraft and spacecraft (which is what a passenger ship to LEO would be). They haven't yet found a way to build a high complexity, profitable product like a Boeing 777 airliner or a Boeing 702 satellite with a small shop.

      Orbital Sciences, for example, has evolved from a small company with a few neat ideas back in the 80's (in particular, the air launched Pegasus) into a major player in the aerospace world, and it is structured like Boeing, Northrup, and LockMart today.

      I consider this a positive evolution of the great ideas Scaled Composites has demonstrated into something that can be built and be a commercial success.

      --
      Worst...sig...ever!
    2. Re:This is unfortunate by onion_joe · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I tend to agree with several other posters in that this is potentially not nearly as bad as feared. We are not talking Microsoft here :-)

      Perhaps the best example I can cite is the Lockheed (now Lockheed-Martin) Skunkworks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skunkworks. In short, Skunkworks was essentially as company within a company, with its own budget and most importantly, corporate mentality.

      If The Management at NG do not recognize the value of this type of organizational structure within their advanced research division, well, let both Burt Rutan and NG collapse.

      I hardly think Rutan was in this venture to make money. And now he's got the resources to make everyday space travel a reality.

      Hats off to you, good sir.

      --
      sig sig sig siggy sig
  2. There goes innovation... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I suspect that Scaled will become less innovative under the management of a large, established company, unfortunately. Them with the money calls the shots :(


    Best of luck to Rutan with establishing another aero company if he wants to...


    -b.

  3. Great, but... by qazsedcft · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I applaud attempts to create a tourism of space, but so far there is nothing especially interesting in the presented solutions. They are just building smaller and cheaper rockets. These "space ships" don't even achieve stable orbits. They're basically only throwing a large object high enough that it needs a few minutes to fall back. So besides the nice view and the temporary weightlessness (which can be achieved by an airplane), there's nothing special about it.

    What I would like to see is some truly innovative solutions. Things that bring us closer to a conquest of space. Contests such as the X Prize should focus on that instead of giving money away for stuff that's been done 50 years ago.

  4. Re:surprise, space is a business. by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

    this also has the faint smell of "NASA can't cut it any more, their memoes all blow up." Memoes? Is that like Dan Quayle's "potatoe"?
    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  5. Translation: The beginning of the end for Scaled C by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Slashdot story needs translation. Probably something like this, in my opinion:

    "Northrop Grumman Corporation top managers decided they were bored with their regular business. They decided to buy a business they can talk about at parties. Of course, they have nothing creative to contribute. They are contributing only money. So, they will degrade Burt Rutan's Scaled Composites with their company politics, their need to be seen as important, and their general disinterest in doing the real work."

  6. Re:surprise, space is a business. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That scenario is a silly fantasy, perpetuated by people who have no idea how to run a business. If you buy a competitor just to make it go away, you realize no benefit from the purchase. Grumman bought Scaled because they want Scaled's capabilities in their toolkit. Scaled was not in the business of building fighter jets for the Navy, or bidding against Grumman on massive defense contracts. Calling them a competitor at all is a bit of a stretch.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  7. Re:consolidations by deimtee · · Score: 2, Funny

    prizes

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    --
    I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
  8. That's a shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work for one of the other mega-aerospace companies, and it's a wonder that anything we build ever flies after it's been through the cogs of the bureaucracy (to say nothing of the added blanket of the government customer). It's a shame that an outfit as innovative and down to earth (if you'll forgive the analogy) as Scaled Composites will inevitably be larded down with all the little empires and big nonsense of aero-bureaucracy.

  9. Scaled composites by waterdude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Having worked at Scaled Composites in Montrose, CO I must say that the writing is probably on the wall for the Mojave Company. You probably haven't heard of a Montrose branch. That's because after having trouble with our bottom line being in cahoots with Burt Rutan we found a large company to buy us out and when our bottom line failed to improve we were bought out by another larger company. When the bottom line failed to satisfy the larger company we closed our doors and a fine r&d company with a lot of talented engineers and fabricators ceased to exist. Burt Rutan and many other people including some of our engineers are cutting edge innovators and people like them are the reason our country is so great but they are finding it harder and harder to develop new technologies and to be inventive because the big money companies that now own almost everything squeeze them out of their budgets. I think the solution is for the small companies to resist selling out to large corporations and continue their cutting edge work while taking on enough boring jobs to keep their bills and workforce paid. Too often today, companies are formed with the idea that if they show promise and profitability, they can sell out for a profit. I hope that Burt Rutan can continue to do what he does best and I'm fairly confident that, given his drive, talent, and inteligence he'll do whatever he needs to go on innovating and exploring new things.

  10. Re:surprise, space is a business. by kcbrown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That scenario is a silly fantasy, perpetuated by people who have no idea how to run a business. If you buy a competitor just to make it go away, you realize no benefit from the purchase.

    If you buy a competitor just to make it go away, then you remove some of the downward price pressure in the market and therefore make yourself more competitive in that market than you would be otherwise. The closer to a monopoly situation you can get, the more control you have over the market prices. And that is a very real benefit, because it means more profits for you.

    Whether the move ends up being worth it or not depends on how much you paid to remove the competitor versus how much money you can make as a result of the increased prices (or lack of decreased prices) you can charge afterwards. If a competitor looks to be on the verge of becoming very successful (and thus wielding a lot more market clout), then it's obviously better to buy them out earlier (before they get really successful) than afterwards because it's cheaper and it heads off the changes to market expectations that a successful, scrappy player can bring.

    No, I'm afraid the possibility that Grumman bought out Scaled Composites for this reason is very real. Scaled Composites is probably close to the point where they look like they can make a very real change to the expectations of the market, and that would put the traditional players like Grumman in a very bad position.

    Think of it as the equivalent of IBM buying Apple right before Apple made the mass-produced personal computer a reality. Doing so probably would have given IBM another few years, at least, of dominance of the computer market with their mainframes, but it would have taken a lot of insight and foresight on the part of IBM to know to make that move. That said, it was a lot cheaper to become a successful small computer manufacturer back then (Apple got started in a garage, and started shipping product while still in the garage phase) than it is to become a successful aerospace company today, so the buyout strategy would be more expensive for the big players in the case of computers because there would be more targets they'd have to buy out.

    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
  11. Re:surprise, space is a business. by Sperbels · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Give me a break. Scaled Composites wasn't a competitor. They've just been squashed by the military industrial complex. I expect we'll see very little from them now.

  12. Re:surprise, space is a business. by Pseudonym · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Scaled Composites is probably close to the point where they look like they can make a very real change to the expectations of the market [...]

    The simpler explanation (thank you Occam) is that Scaled Composites has created a completely new market out of thin air, and Northrop wants a bigger piece of the action.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  13. Re:surprise, space is a business. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Scaled doesn't and has never manufactured Air/Space (mostly Air) Crafts on a mass scale.
    They would build prototypes based on requests that they would receive.

    Grumman is buying a design firm which they themselves have used in the past.

  14. Re:surprise, space is a business. by PopeJP3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except for the fact that Northrop had no space business to speak of until they bought TRW a couple of years ago exactly for that reason. And that was for satellites. The others are right. It is a new market and Northrop wants a big piece of it. This is made more obvious by the fact that they had a 40 percent stake in the company originally.

  15. Northrop Grumman's "Skunk Works" equivalent? by argent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You hear a lot about Lockheed Martin's "Skunk Works", but Northrop Grumman keeps a lower profile in the "Crazy Ideas That Just Might Work" department. Perhaps they're looking to change that.

  16. Re:Translation: The beginning of the end for Scale by swordgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ah yes, because nothing improves news more than pointless conjecture and outright fiction.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  17. Compete with Lockheed? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Didn't Lockheed win the contract to build the Space Shuttle replacement vehicle? If so, this could be Northrop's bid to compete by pursuing the commercial sector...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  18. Kind of a bummer by rastoboy29 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I know Mr. Rutan deserves whatever he gets, but still it's a bummer to me. I had kindof liked the idea of young whippersnapper companies being the ones to crack open mass market space travel.

    Still, it was probably inevitable, and I certainly still wish them all the best luck possible.

  19. Re:surprise, space is a business. by J'raxis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're not a competitor to Northrop Grumman directly; they're a competitor to the government monopoly on space travel, however small. They're showing that an alternative to such is viable. And as I was saying, Northrop Grumman and the other big defense contractors might as well be considered an arm of the government, except perhaps on paper.

    As for benefit? Uncle Sam says something like, "Buy out Scaled Composites, and we'll make sure such-and-such tax break goes through, and we'll buy an extra dozen helicopters from you this year," and there's all the benefit you need.

  20. Selling out.... by borgheron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, basically, what you're saying is that a new, fresh company sold out to and older behemoth. Does this mean the end of new, fresh ideas from Burt Rutan?

    GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  21. Re:uhh, 20th century, too by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

    FWIW, I'm from the midwest and that is the way we were taught to spell potatoe and tomatoe. I don't know if it is a rural thing, a midwest thing or what, but I never understood why folks got into such a tizzy over the spelling. And the reason is exactly as you state, it is the proper way to make the preceding vowel a long sound. Soe, I guess you also goe to the store. Noe?
    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  22. Re:surprise, space is a business. by jacks0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    E.F. Northrup wrote a science fiction book about a private venture going to the moon- complete with a serious technical appendix- back in 1936, entitled "Zero to Eighty" under the amusing pseudonym "Akkad Pseudoman". It is a bizarre fake autobiographical novel, and well worth reading, if you can find it.

    Maybe it is offtopic and irrelevant, but in a thread about his company looking to get into the private space industry, responding to a user with the name "pseudonym"; well I couldn't resist.

  23. Scaled's business structure by willboy42 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Scaled Composites has been a wholly-owned entity of larger companies in the past: it was Beechcraft around the time Scaled was working on the Starship prototype, and Wyman-Gordon soon thereafter. The prototype output from the shop has been pretty consistent throughout the history of the company, so I highly doubt there'll be much change there. Both NG and Scaled have supposedly said as much in their announcements of the deal.

    Northrop Grumman has been heavily involved in the Proteus program for several years now, and was looking at using an unmanned Proteus in production as their response for some DoD RFQ a short while back . And as previously noted, they did have 40% ownership prior to this announcement, and that would buy a fair amount of influence if that's what they were going for.

    My guess is that NG wanted Scaled so they could wrap up Proteus whole cloth, and who knows, maybe even resurrect some older programs like ARES or ATTT, that Scaled had trouble getting DoD attention for back in the day. And with the cash infusion, Scaled will get the capital it probably needs to keep the SS2 program moving along and into low volume production, something you don't typicallly have to worry about with one-off prototypes that are their bread and butter.

  24. Re:surprise, space is a business. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Huh? I know conspiracy theories are popular here on Slashdot, but this is getting out of hand.

    Here's a scenario that doesn't require the application of a tinfoil hat: NG took a look at NASA, and the aging Shuttle fleet, and realized that in the very near future, the U.S. space program is going to be out a launch vehicle. And because of certain other priorities that have gotten pushed to the forefront recently, NASA seems like they're pretty much out of the reusable-launch-vehicle business for the time being.

    This is a pretty big opportunity. There's going to be a demand for launch vehicles, both for tourism and for more conventional purposes, and the company who can build a post-Shuttle reusable launch vehicle stands to make a lot of money. But, doing that is pretty hard, and it's not something that NG really knows anything about. They're not a space company. TRW is, sort of, but they're more of a satellite company.

    The list of companies who have experience in actually building crap that goes from the earth to space (or even near it) is pretty short. Not only that, but there are a limited and finite supply of engineers who know how to do, and have experience in, that kind of stuff. And most of the other players on the field are pretty big (Raytheon, Lockheed-Martin, etc.). Compared to them, Scaled Composites is tiny, cheap, and seems to be turning out new ideas at a good rate.

    NG took a full stake in SC, because it's cheaper than trying to reinvent what SC has already done, and it could potentially give NG a favorable position over its real competitors (Raytheon, LM) in the future.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."