Deathly Hallows / OOTP Movie Discussion
At midnight on Friday Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was released, ending the ten year run of J.K. Rowling's extremely popular book series. I imagine that there are a few folks here who have already read the book and want to talk about it. Likewise, the movie version of Order of the Phoenix was recently released (a film I was kind of underwhelmed by). So ... what did you think of them? Be forewarned: I imagine the comments will be filled with spoilers.
You're retarded It was only Snape you were supposed to wonder about, and he was one of the most important characters in the books because of it.
ResidntGeek
Harry potter discussion on my Slashdot?
/. readers might be interested, but it's completely outside the scope of the site. When i see stuff like this it ends up feeling like the site is a blog owned by the moderators and nothing more. Sorry, but it's true.
Hear, hear. Reminds me of the time a "discussion" was started over the ending of the Sopranos. It's hard to say it without sounding like a dick, but someone has to do it: maybe editors should stick to stories relevant to the interests of the site (you know, "news for nerds, stuff that matters"), instead of stories/discussions that interests them.
I'm know that i'm not alone in not giving a shit about Harry Potter, and the thing is, a lot of
In other words - you're a fucking idiot (regardless of whether you read Harry Potter or not; you're dumb).
why is this crap on slashdot?
1. Harry potter homos
2. RPG's with original rules -- something which has nothing to do with WOtC
3. Rest of the fags who like HP
4. Rowling.. Fucking bitch, die
5. Any fantasy fiction not written by Tolkien
6. Grown up men, reading homo faggotry by rowling.
Fizzl tappaa, paloittelee ja hautaa takapihalleen joka vitun homon joka lukee potteria.
Bot Assisted Blogging
Some time translation matters. Heck, look at the bible. There is a huge difference between the entire world flooding and a valley flooding. Imagine the impact that difference may have had on religion had the proper translation been made accessible? The mistranslated version makes for powerful stuff. The real translation means they documented something is which well known to occur, and is geologically documented as having occurred.
A translated version is only as good as the translator...and often they are only as good they are a historian when we are talking about old texts.
Just some good for thought.