Slashdot Mirror


How Microsoft Beat Linux In China

kripkenstein notes an analysis up on TechRepublic detailing how Microsoft beat Linux in China, and the consequences of that victory: "With the soon-to-be largest economy standardized on Windows desktops, desktop Linux does seem to have an uphill battle ahead of it." "Linux has turned out to be little more than a key bargaining chip in a high stakes game of commerce between the Chinese government and the world's largest software maker... The fact that... Linux failed to gain a major foothold in China is yet another blow to desktop Linux. After nearly eight years of being on the verge of a breakthrough, Linux seems more destined than ever to be a force in the server room but little more than a narrow niche and an anomaly on the desktop."

2 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why does it matter? by Viol8 · · Score: 1, Troll

    "Before Windows (or DOS...) there was no high-volume, mainstream OS that ran on commodity hardware"

    Never heard of CP/M then?

    "The result was a huge amount of innovation in hardware devices and software that worked with Windows"

    Oh please. The PC up until maybe 5-10 years ago was anything but innovative. The Amiga and Mac in the 80s were light years ahead of the PC in both hardware and software.

    Bill Gates had a good business head but his software and OSes were shit and only recently is any quality starting to show and some would debate even that.

  2. Re:Why does it matter? by dch24 · · Score: 0, Troll

    You can't compare Windows 3.1 sales from 1983 to CP/M sales from 1979.

    By the time Windows was even relevant, CP/M was already in its grave and the Linux kernel was getting started. We have taken a 25 year detour and are just getting back to where we started with the Apple I, Altair, and PC clones: general-purpose hardware that works without an expensive software package that doesn't work. Where have you been?