Web Contracts Can't Be Changed Without Notice
RZG writes "The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled on July 18th that contracts posted online cannot be updated without notifying users (PDF of ruling). 'Parties to a contract have no obligation to check the terms on a periodic basis to learn whether they have been changed by the other side,' the court wrote. This ruling has consequences for many online businesses, which took for granted their right to do this (see for example item 19 in Google's Terms of Service)."
What about the mega-corporation's rights to mercilessly screw their customers? This ruling ain't fair, you know.
The 9th Court's own tool for retriving court decisions includes the same clause they say can't be used:
r m.pl
If these Policies and Procedures change in a significant way, information regarding the changes will be posted on the PACER Service Center web site (pacer.psc.uscourts.gov). It is the acocunt holder's responsibility to check these Policies and Procedures regularly for changes.
https://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/psco/cgi-bin/regfo
Brokeback Mountain land, that is.
They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
Wow. This guy knows the law, and CmdrTaco, too.