You see, we have cars nowadays too. I can't possibly see why I should have to spend all that time learning how to walk, run, hike/exercise when I can just get in a car and get there instantly.
I really want to know a big long list of why you hate AT&T. I tried to find your e-mail address, but it's not shown publicly. If you could, send me an e-mail and let me know sometime?
Yeah, because I'm sure those e-mails took up just soooo much space, they *had* to re-use the tapes because they were just bursting with petabytes of data...
I don't mean to troll or anything, but can someone explain why anybody who understands the concept of DRM would ever even consider having anything to do with it?
So, by this logic I can send Verizon a letter/notice of a $100 per letter-opening fee unless they specifically call me to Opt-Out? And if they don't pay, send them to collections and/or small claims?
once you get to any level of _serious_ creative work, Macintosh is the only viable option left with the demise of Irix.
I don't know what you're talking about.
I work in a number of fields, including visual effects, motion graphics, graphic design, particle simulations and so on. I run Photoshop, After Effects, RealFlow, Eyeon Fusion, Maya, Matchmover, Stitcher, 3dsmax, I could go on.
My point is, I run an Apple 30" cinema display, and I find it quite productive running Windows XP. I don't see the macintosh advantage. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with running a macintosh, but I don't understand a statement like "macintosh is the only viable option."
Tell me what you're talking about so I can finally understand.
For those who would have bought from them anyway, I can only hope that they purchase only the DRM free music tracks, thereby effectively voting with their wallets.
Those who care will figure out how to opt-out. Those who don't care in the first place are probably not the kind of people who read a privacy policy anyhow.
If that's the case, why can't one of the higher-ups from the Regal Cinema just check the camera, and if indeed there is only a 20 second clip, then just let it go?
What ever happened to common sense? Must everything be litigated? They have no damages for crying out loud. No damages.
From the second their rootkit copy "protection" was announced, article after article warned of its doom. Gee, what a surprise. I don't see Sony as a victim here even if MediaMax fucked up terribly.
It sounds like they don't even check whether any copyright violations occurred, they're just sending bills to any business that may or may not have live music.
I don't know if this applies to boilerplate letters like this, but it seems like just randomly trying to threaten small business owners like this is probably prohibited.
Take a look here and here for information on vexatious litigants.
Slashdot Mirror
You see, we have cars nowadays too. I can't possibly see why I should have to spend all that time learning how to walk, run, hike/exercise when I can just get in a car and get there instantly.
Maybe there's a need for this law. There are probably examples cited throughout the legal text of the proposed law.
I really want to know a big long list of why you hate AT&T. I tried to find your e-mail address, but it's not shown publicly. If you could, send me an e-mail and let me know sometime?
:)
Thanks a bunch
Yeah, because I'm sure those e-mails took up just soooo much space, they *had* to re-use the tapes because they were just bursting with petabytes of data...
Below the Root. Windham Classics. For the Apple IIGS.
Thank you for breaking that down for me.
I just always expect DRM to fail. Fail to keep my music/movies/etc. from eventual disaster.
You might consider a small claims lawsuit against Yahoo to recover your ~$200.
I don't mean to troll or anything, but can someone explain why anybody who understands the concept of DRM would ever even consider having anything to do with it?
Well, don't leave us hanging! Did you in fact see Larry, and was he 'teh gay'?
So, by this logic I can send Verizon a letter/notice of a $100 per letter-opening fee unless they specifically call me to Opt-Out? And if they don't pay, send them to collections and/or small claims?
I work in a number of fields, including visual effects, motion graphics, graphic design, particle simulations and so on. I run Photoshop, After Effects, RealFlow, Eyeon Fusion, Maya, Matchmover, Stitcher, 3dsmax, I could go on.
My point is, I run an Apple 30" cinema display, and I find it quite productive running Windows XP. I don't see the macintosh advantage. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with running a macintosh, but I don't understand a statement like "macintosh is the only viable option."
Tell me what you're talking about so I can finally understand.
Give me a break, this kinda stuff never ha--!@#$!@ & #####
[NO CARRIER]
I'd test this out on WindowsME, but, I know I won't be able to get it started ;P
Vote.
Think of (all?) the people who now have a good use for their BluRay players. ;P
Now that's what I'm talkin' about.
If that's the case, why can't one of the higher-ups from the Regal Cinema just check the camera, and if indeed there is only a 20 second clip, then just let it go?
What ever happened to common sense? Must everything be litigated? They have no damages for crying out loud. No damages.
They would think "poor guy, he must be tyred."
Just took too damn long.
o adn b4 i 4get, m gna need u 2 come in on s-day 2, m-k? gr888888...
I'm not interested unless it comes with a free chair to throw when I realize how crippled it is. :D
Preferably signed by Ballmer himself.
From the second their rootkit copy "protection" was announced, article after article warned of its doom. Gee, what a surprise. I don't see Sony as a victim here even if MediaMax fucked up terribly.