Slashdot Mirror


Bill Would Criminalize Attempted IP Infringement

ianare writes "H.R. 3155, the Intellectual Property Enhanced Criminal Enforcement Act of 2007, has been introduced in Congress by Rep. Steve Chabot (R-OH). In most cases, the bill appears to simply double existing penalties. One big change however, is that people could now be charged with criminal copyright infringement even if such infringement has not actually taken place. Not surprisingly, the EFF has condemned the legislation."

9 of 211 comments (clear)

  1. My IP is 127.0.0.1 so don't infringe on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I call "dibs" on IP 127.0.0.1
    Any IP infringers out there...be warned...that's MY IP you're infringing upon

  2. Not law yet by ianare · · Score: 5, Informative

    Keep in mind this bill is not passed into law (yet ??). So there is still time to try to stop it!

    Ya I know, online petition is not the best way. Write to your representatives if you can.

  3. Criminalize wasting tax dollars? by HitekHobo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Between the DMCA, the BSA, the RIAA and the MPAA, we have legislation and watchdog groups to cover every imaginable form of piracy. The courts are already having to deal with lawsuits over pathetic amounts of money to make an example of people. Do we really need to have federal agencies doing the investigation as well and make room in the criminal judicial system as well?

  4. "Attempted" Infringement by hardburn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what evidence do you need of "attempted" infringement? Will having a BitTorrent client on your system be enough? I can easily see a RIAA lawyer taking that stance in court.

    --
    Not a typewriter
  5. Re:FP? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's different. You are still innocent until proven guilty, it's just that now you can be found guilty of intent to pirate. They still have to prove that before they can dish out any punishment.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  6. Re:Really now... by false_cause · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope so. I attempted chemistry twice in college.

  7. Re:FP? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 5, Funny

    you're charged with a different crime - "attempted burglary, not borglary

    Borglary - the act of assimilating all of someone's stuff into your own collective.

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  8. Re:FP? by Evilest+Doer · · Score: 5, Funny

    But after all, isn't stopping file sharing an integral part of the War On Terror?
    No, it's more of a derivative of the War on Terror.
    --
    I feel like death on a soda cracker.
  9. Time to start writing... by Jorgandar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If everyone on slashdot took 5 minutes to write to your local congressman/woman, this would create enough noise for them to notice, it's not OK to be doing this anymore...here is my letter:

    "Dr mr Waxman, I am writing you to urge your opposition to H.R.3155, which is still in committee. Should it go to general debate, it will double penalties for copyright infringement, and introduce new crimes in the process. I'm sick of congress making criminals out of innocent people and wasting our tax money enforcing this. This is being pushed by the RIAA no doubt.

    Copyright issues are a CIVIL case, they are not criminal offenses, and should be dealt with accordingly. I for one am fed up with the congress that looks out only for big businesses. Its time to make laws that are good for the people. This is not one of them. Furthermore, a punishment should fit a the "crime". Copying an mp3 file or a movie is not a big crime. Nobody died. Nobody was hurt. Nothing was stolen (the original is still there). No property was damaged. Lets treat it as it is. Current laws are ridiculously harsh. We need to roll back the power your friends in congress have given the big RIAA machine and give it back to the people. "