Slashdot Mirror


RIAA Backtracks After Embarrassing P2P Defendant

Harmony writes "When the RIAA sued Sgt. Nicholas Paternoster, it included a screenshot of a shared folder with over 4,600 files — some of which were pornographic images unrelated to the case. Last week, the RIAA got permission from a judge to, as a 'professional courtesy,' swap out the original exhibit for one with only the 350+ songs the defendant is accused of sharing on Kazaa. The RIAA's carelessness may come back to haunt it, however: 'After the suit was filed — and the exhibit made public — Sgt. Paternoster decided to fight back, filing a counterclaim accusing the RIAA of violating his privacy and seeking to "shame Counter-Plaintiff... into giving in to their unreasonable demands regarding their copyrighted materials."'"

2 of 255 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Sgt. WHAT? by mtmra70 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Troll? Not really since his real last name can actually spell Pornstar.

  2. Re:RIAA's ideas of property and ownership by lilomar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wow. So is JKR subtly poking at copyright laws, or is it a happy coincidence?

    btw, I haven't read the book yet, and almost didn't read your post after I saw the words "Deathly Hallows". Do you know how hard it is to avoid spoilers on the internet? =/

    --
    The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.