Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Red Hat to Enter the Desktop Market

Posted by CowboyNeal on from the hat-into-the-ring dept.

head_dunce writes "It looks like Red Hat is going to release their Global Desktop Linux in September and give Ubuntu a challenge for the Linux desktop market. Red Hat Global Desktop 'would be sold with a one-year subscription to security updates.'" It looks like another choice for the proverbial Aunt Tillie. The release is being delayed in order to provide greater media compatibility, "to permit users to view a wide range of video formats on their computers."

10 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. A day late and a dollar short. by gumpish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Red Hat Global Desktop 'would be sold with a one-year subscription to security updates.'
    Hmmm, let's see... on the one hand I can start paying for updates after 12 months.... on the other hand I get free updates for 18 months (or 36 months for LTS releases).

    Maybe the execs at Red Hat need to update their hat size as whatever they're wearing appears to be cutting off circulation to their brains.
    1. Re:A day late and a dollar short. by mikael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmmm, let's see... on the one hand I can start paying for updates after 12 months.... on the other hand I get free updates for 18 months (or 36 months for LTS releases).

      Business people like accountability, and the ability to see that a problem is under control. Being able to
      tell them that you have arranged for a field engineer scheduled to visit, or that the support team is working on the problem, is more reassuring to them than saying that that you have sent out an E-mail to a discussion group to see if anyone else has had a similar problem. To them, either you are the person to fix the problem or you can't.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:A day late and a dollar short. by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's right. We should all try to price everything identically and then somehow end up with choices of different products and services that cater to different needs despite all of that.

      Well, maybe not. Perhaps we should see what RedHat plans to produce that justifies the expense. Me, personally, I've subscribed to pay services in lieu of free services because I felt the pay service was worth spending money on, it wasn't excessively priced, and I'd rather support an organization dedicated to providing me with a service than one that ultimately is responsible only to itself, or to a myriad of advertisers with their own agendas.

      I'm not knocking Ubuntu, and without seeing RedHat's product, it's impossible for me to judge as to whether it'll be worth the money, but the notion that we can make that judgement right now purely on the basis of cost per month of service is ridiculous.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:A day late and a dollar short. by init100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Canonical has done a great job of building a community that is loyal

      A community that happily piss on other Linux users because they are not using Ubuntu. That is quite a strong turn-off.

      It would be one thing if they were few and far between, but every time there is a story about a non-Ubuntu distro, there are a whole lot of comments like

      Are they still alive? Why the heck are those users not using Ubuntu instead? Ubuntu FTW! Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu!

      and

      The problem with <distro XXXX> is that it isn't Ubuntu.

  2. RedHat Panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has "OMG Ubunutu is getting so much press, we need some of that action quick or they'll own the market!" panic written all over it.

  3. Re:All I want in a linux distro is... by siride · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Talk to the patent owners or the legal system, not the distros. They're just doing what they have to do.

  4. Uh oh by DogDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't a good sign. They just got finished dumping their desktop version, and now they're making another one? Sounds like their management is starting to flounder. Either they're a desktop software company, or they're not. They've already left the market, and only a few years later, they're re-inventing the wheel to get back in? That's crazy. It reminds me of Sun "The network is the computer. No it's not." Microsystems.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  5. Re:CentOS by lordtoran · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These "clones" don't threaten Red Hat's business, because they don't come with these all-in-one support options that businesses love. Plus they have to contribute modified code back, so it's even a kind of win-win situation.

    --
    Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
  6. Re:Wake Us Up When... by MrHanky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Application folders and "drag and drop installation" won't work on Linux, as you can't know which libraries are installed on the computer, and in which version. Say you want to install the Kword 2.0 beta. This depends on the kdelibs 4.0 (beta) and the Koffice libs. With an app folder approach, the Kword 2.0 beta would have to package those libraries as well. And so would all the other apps depending on those libraries. Or, of course, they could all be one huge package with lots of stuff you don't need.

    There is another approach, of course, which is that of Apple: You know mostly which libraries are installed on the system, since they are all part of the OS, but when there is an application depending on a newer version of the libraries, you have to pay Apple for a newer version of the whole OS as well. This is easy enough if you have a monopoly on that particular platform, but then you also have a proprietary platform. Red Hat doesn't have that privilege.

    What you want is obviously a Mac. Then get a Mac.

  7. YALD by wwmedia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    we dont need Yet Another Linux Distro, there are plenty already! we need them developers join a bigger project like Ubuntu and Suse and not reinvent the wheel over and over