Slashdot Mirror


Surviving in Space Without a Spacesuit

Geoffrey writes "The recent movie Sunshine features a scene (echoing the famous scene in 2001: a Space Odyssey) in which two astronauts have to cross from one ship to another without spacesuits. But, can you survive in space without a spacesuit? Morgan Smith, writing in Slate, asks whether this is realistic, and concludes: "Yes, for a very short time.""

38 of 481 comments (clear)

  1. SG-1 had a similar scene by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the episode where they were experimenting with a captured ship, T'lk and O'Neill were flung out to Jupiter and left without a way to get home.

    Carter's dad, herself and Daniel are able to rescue them but the two have to eject from their ship and float in space for a few seconds before the ring transport can be used.

    I do believe that the two had a spacesuit of some type on but not one that was designed for space. More of a general cover suit.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by ucblockhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lots of SF shows have done it. Battlestar Galactica did it as well.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    2. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by Mr.Fork · · Score: 4, Informative

      Didn't Chief and his wife (Cally?) have to go into hyperbaric chambers? I think that is the most accurate portrayal of recovery from space exposure. Didn't Outlander as well with Sean O'Connery deal with this too? I think the guy exploded from the inside out from rapid decompression - but I think that could of been a little Hollywoodish.

      I think that the injuries the dude form Event Horizon also were pretty real too - his eyes were damaged, frost, and the bubbling of gas from his blood "the bends".

      --
      Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. - Peter F. Drucker
    3. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by Ucklak · · Score: 4, Funny

      I liked how Outland dealt with the subject; just have the guys explode making a mess in their spacesuit.
      Can you imagine being the next guy to use that suit?

      "Uh, sorry but Jeff thought that tarantulas were crawling in his suit so he pulled his air line and exploded. We cleaned it the best we could."

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    4. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by profplump · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm with you on the exploding -- if you're caught in space you want to do everything possible to reduce your internal pressure.

      But it's not that cold in space. There's not a lot of ambient heat, but there's not a lot of conduction or convection either -- you only lose heat as fast as you radiate. So on the timescale of "holding your breath" the temperature of space is not a significant factor. Likewise the radiation you'd absorb over 60 seconds is likely not a large factor, unless you're particularly close to the source (I don't recall the episode, so I can't comment on their depiction of distance from the star(s)).

    5. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by orzetto · · Score: 4, Funny

      And the best quote from that episode was seconds before that, when Carter asked whether it was possible to transport them directly from the inside of the fighter:

      Carter Dad, can you beam them up?

      Jacob/Selmak Who am I, Scotty?

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    6. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by rev063 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And if you want some insight into the effects of truly extreme pressure changes on the human body (next to which the vacuum of space is peanuts) I recommend reading about the Byford Dolphin diving bell accident. Not for the squeamish.

    7. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by thanatos_x · · Score: 4, Informative

      It really depends on how far away you are. I'd imagine anywhere much past earth and you aren't picking up a significant portion from the sun.

      Fortunately as the other poster mentioned, you have relatively little to worry about with the cold - although there is an extreme temperature difference, there's also a near vacuum, which makes heat transfer very difficult (it only happens through radiation, which may not be the kind you're thinking)

      The liquid on your skin would boil away, but it would boil at a very low temperature because of the low pressure. It's possible to have a pot of water boil at 33 degrees... (and probably much lower - look up a phase change diagram) Anyways, since the water on your skin would already be 'hot' enough to boil, I don't believe it would draw any heat from you.

      As far as the space station and heat/cooling, it's not the best example - everything depends on how it's positioned relative to the earth/sun. I'm sure it requires heating if the earth obscures the sun from it,and cooling if it's facing the sun... The lack of an atmosphere makes places like the moon change hundreds of degrees in minutes.

      Maybe that helps.

      --
      I am not an expert. If I am misled in something, please correct me.
  2. Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your breath by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative
    This has been dealt with many times before and there is even a case of a NASA tech who was exposed to vacuum in 1966. He lost consciousness in about 12-14 seconds and was regained consciousness without injury after they restored pressure at about 30 seconds.

    The conscensus seems to be consciousness for 10-15 seconds, no serious injury for 60 seconds to 2 minutes.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. next time by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 4, Funny
    good thing to remember next time you're in space:

    Of course, on Earth, you could hold your breath for several minutes without passing out. But that's not going to help in a vacuum. In fact, attempting to hold your breath is a sure way to a quick death.

    --
    An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    1. Re:next time by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I haven't RTFA'd yet- but IIRC, the "Asmovian" version of this required that for maximum survival, you had to hyperventalate (to maximize oxygen storage in the bloodstream), empty the lungs, and be in shadow since the sun puts out so much energy that without an atmosphere you risk a pretty bad sunburn.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  4. You can survive for 30 seconds by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 5, Funny

    But the odds of being picked up by a passing space ship in that time are two to the power of 2079460347 to one against.

    1. Re:You can survive for 30 seconds by Thrakamazog · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and falling

  5. low-pressure spaceship env. by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The decompression effects may be reduced/delayed if the space station uses a 100% oxygen atmosphere at a low pressure, then the pressure delta between what your body is equalized to and the vacuum is reduced so the trauma is delayed a bit.

    The ISS uses normal sea-level pressure, but I believe some of the spacecraft used for the moon shots used the low-pressure environment.

    1. Re:low-pressure spaceship env. by evanbd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's a bigger problem with that though -- if you lower the pressure of the atmosphere, but add more O2 to keep the partial pressure the same, you increase the fire hazard. Inert gases like nitrogen act as a buffer and reduce flammability. Fires in spacecraft are a big deal, which (I believe) is why ISS uses higher pressure.

      The major problem with exposure to vacuum isn't the pressure anyway, it's the lack of air. Furthermore, you can't hold your breath, because your lungs aren't strong enough to hold in the air. Without any air in your lungs, you get about 10-15 seconds of consciousness.

  6. Forget the big problem; important smaller problem by weak* · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe, but once they retrieve you, if your clothing needs to be removed for any reason (e.g. medical), you're going to have shrinkage like you just did the polar bear plunge... and all in front of your unreasonably hot female costar. :(

    --
    The Schwartz space ain't from Spaceballs.
  7. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by tonsofpcs · · Score: 4, Informative

    It would take nearly forever for you to cool off that much, you would explode due to pressure differential long before you would cool down, as any cooling would be due to releasing radiant heat. There is neither conductive nor convective heat loss as there is nothing cooler than you there, as there is nothing but you.

  8. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But there is almost nothing to conduct the heat. You can survive a long time in 40F degree air. Now just in 40F degree water and see how long it takes before hypothermia sets in. The difference is conduction. There would be (almost) nothing to carry away your body heat in space.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  9. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by Zenaku · · Score: 4, Insightful
    As per the article:

    What about the frostbite? That's actually the least plausible result of Sunshine's suitless spacewalk. The cold wouldn't cause Mace too much harm in just 15 seconds, even if he encountered the very lowest temperatures in space. That's because heat leaves the body very slowly in a vacuum.
    --
    If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
  10. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by pegr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't forget about the extreme cold. Space is a very, very cold place. One might think frostbite could be an issue.
     
    It's not quite that easy. Space is not cold (nor warm). Things in space may be warm or cold. How do you lose heat in space? Well, there's no convection because there's no air. You would only lose heat via radiation, a much slower process. For the purposes of this discussion, I think you could ignore temperature, as you would perish well before a drop in heat got ya...

  11. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    we should have a new mod: -1 RTFA

  12. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After he came to, they asked the tech what the last thing he remembered was. He told them the last thing he remembered before blacking out was the saliva on his tongue boiling away (due to the extremely low pressure lowering the boiling point of the saliva)

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  13. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly. The pressure differential is what will more likely kill you, though even that will take time, given the tension of cell membranes. Combine the temperature and pressure differential and you're looking at a short window of maybe 30 - 60 seconds where you get by without major physical damage and perhaps 1 - 2 minutes with some sort of major but survivable damage. And don't forget long term effects, as you will be exposed to intense solar radiation with only minimal protection.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  14. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by AceJohnny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually no, frostbite isn't an issue. In vacuum, there is no heat transfer through convection. The only way to lose heat is through thermal radiation.

    Convection is what will freeze you when you fall in ice-cold water.
    Radiation is what will cool the beer you put in the reflective satellite dish at night.

    In fact, human space modules (such as the ISS, but the ISS has to cope with atmospheric drag too, IIRC), have trouble dealing with excess heat, and have to use large surfaces to maximize radiation output

    --
    Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
  15. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by jschrod · · Score: 5, Informative
    From http://www.sff.net/people/Geoffrey.Landis/vacuum.h tml:

    Would You Freeze?

    No.

    A couple of recent Hollywood films showed people instantly freezing solid when exposed to vacuum. In one of these, the scientist character mentioned that the temperature was "minus 273"-- that is, absolute zero.

    But in a practical sense, space doesn't really have a temperature-- you can't measure a temperature on a vacuum, something that isn't there. The residual molecules that do exist aren't enough to have much of any effect. Space isn't "cold," it isn't "hot", it really isn't anything.

    What space is, though, is a very good insulator. (In fact, vacuum is the secret behind thermos bottles.) Astronauts tend to have more problem with overheating than keeping warm.

    If you were exposed to space without a spacesuit, your skin would most feel slightly cool, due to water evaporating off you skin, leading to a small amount of evaporative cooling. But you wouldn't freeze solid!

    --

    Joachim

    People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

  16. Yup, this was a major factor in the Apollo 1 fire by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

    but I believe some of the spacecraft used for the moon shots used the low-pressure environment.
    Correct. Apollo used a 100% oxygen atmosphere at a lower pressure (I think 3 psi, which approximates the partial pressure of oxygen in normal air at sea-level). When they tested Apollo 1 on the ground, they decided to use 100% oxygen. But because the test was at sea-level, it was 100% oxygen at sea-level pressure. 100% oxygen at 3 psi creates a fire which burns just like regular air at sea-level. 100% oxygen at sea-level pressure creates an inferno.
  17. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by pclminion · · Score: 5, Informative

    It would take nearly forever for you to cool off that much, you would explode due to pressure differential

    No, you would not. Standard air pressure is about 15 PSI. Thus, being in vacuum can never apply more than 15 PSI to your internal organs, unless you came from a substantially pressurized environment.

    SCUBA divers experience sudden pressure changes in the realm of 15 PSI all the time. They don't "explode," they just get the bends. It's something you want to avoid, definitely, but you aren't going to blow your guts just because the ambient pressure drops by 15 PSI.

  18. A Serious case of YMMV by wsanders · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A long time ago I took a pressure chamber ride at NASA to 27,000 ft. I lasted about 15 sec until uselessness (the crew master didn't let us go all the way to LOC), and 27,000 is not a particularly extreme altitude. Generally, 50,000 ft is considered the altitude at which the partial pressure of oxygen is no longer adequate to maintain consciousness. You can survive up to about 80,000 if you "pressure breathe", i.e have a rig that forces oxygen into your lungs at a lightly higher pressure than ambient, but not enough to bust your lungs.

    And as TFA pointed out you will embolize if you hold your breath above that more or less 80,000 ft altitude.

    So if the acronum YMMV ever applies, it's here.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  19. Re:15 seconds? by Ihlosi · · Score: 4, Informative
    The lungs can't 'extract' oxygen from the blood, can they?

    Lungs can't extract anything. Gas exchange in the lungs is purely driven by diffusion, which moves gasses from areas with higher partial pressure to those with lower partial pressure.

    In Earths atmosphere, the partial pressure of CO2 in your blood is higher than in your lungs, so CO2 moves from your blood to the air in your lungs. The partial pressure of oxygen is higher in the air in your lungs than in your blood, so oxygen moves from the air into the blood (where it oxygenates the hemoglobin in your red blood cells, thereby keeping the partial pressure lower than it would be, allowing more oxygen to be taken up by the blood than would be possible if the oxygen simply went into solution).

  20. In space, nobody can.. by Plutonite · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..hear your frozen dick fall off.

    [The author of this post understands the negligible effects of loss of heat solely through radiation in extremely short time periods, but encourages the reader to take a break and try to laugh].

  21. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by paeanblack · · Score: 4, Informative

    It would take nearly forever for you to cool off that much

    Convection and conduction will be negligible. Net loss by radiation in outer space will be on the order of 400-500W. That will drop the average body temperature about 5 C / hr. Your skin will be in bad shape pretty quickly, but it will take a day or so to turn you into a popsicle all the way through.

    The joker here is evaporative cooling. Depending on the moisture on/in your skin/mouth/lungs, the human body cooling rates can sustain 10-20KW in a total vacuum. This is fatal within minutes.

    The secret to staying warmer when you find yourself naked in space is to keep calm. You don't want to be sweating.

  22. Re:15 seconds? by Funkcikle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surely, astronauts ought to have better lung capacity than yours truly?
    Try again whilst drunk.
  23. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by bcattwoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    No. The pressure differential is all that matters. It makes no difference if the pressure differential is 30 PSI -> 15 PSI or 15 PSI -> 0 PSI.

    This isn't entirely true. Things are a little different as you begin to approach zero psi. At constant temperature, going from 30 to 15 psi, the volume of an ideal gas doubles. Going from 15 to 0 psi, the volume of an ideal gas goes to infinity.
  24. SCUBA decompression is different by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Informative
    When a SCUBA diver decompresses, the important numbers to whatch are not so much the actual pressures as the ratio between the saturated and new pressure. A 15 PSI (1 atmoshere) change is not a problem on its own, you get that by changing depth by 10m/33ft.

    You can approximately halve your saturated pressure withouth getting bends. In other words, if you have suturated to 30m (4 atm), you can rise to 10m (2 atm) without bends. If you go to the surface you're quartering your pressure which is a Bad Thing.

    I've done a lot of SCUBA, some of it at high altitude (over 6000 ft). At 6000 ft, the surface pressure is far lower, so the effective decompression becomes a lot more complicated. A dive to 65m is equivalent to diving to 80+m at sea level.

    In space (0 atm or thereabouts), the ratios become far harder to maintain and you would not want to be in 0atm for very long.

    Bends is not something you'd want to piss about with. I know a few people who have had mild bends, even had very mild bends myself, but I also know a person who had pretty severe bends when he ran out of air at 40m or so. He was in hospital for a week or so and struggled walking for many months. In more serious cases people have died due to tissue damage in major organs/brain.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  25. Duct tape by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Funny
    Lots. Wrap yourself up. Can't explode then.

    Couple of rolls sounds like a reasonable makeshift pressure suit.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  26. been there by starshining · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've done 4 spacewalks and during vacuum chamber training we open our suit purge valve, allowing the pressure in the suit to drop a bit (from nominal 4.3 psi) and I did feel the sensation of the saliva bubbling; it is similar to the sensation of soda pop on your tongue. I haven't seen the movies mentioned (other than 2001), but my guess about vacuum exposure is that you are more likely to be injured by the flying debris (including your own velocity as you impact a wall or whatever) associated with sudden decompression through a hatch than by a very short exposure to 0 psi. During one chamber run, I had a water line poppet valve stick open when I disconnected from the chamber wall. The water stream broke up into droplets that immediately froze, producing an impressive shower of ice particles. Over about 5 to 10 seconds, the icing point traveled up the water stream and formed a clump around the poppet valve, sealing the leak. Oh, by the way, I tried whistling while EVA and even the nominal suit pressure is too low to produce an audible sound.

  27. Exploding from decompression by rev063 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the guy exploded from the inside out from rapid decompression - but I think that could of been a little Hollywoodish. I used to think of the human body exploding due to decompression being pure Hollywood, too, until I read this:

    Subsequent investigation by forensic pathologists determined that diver D4, being exposed to the highest pressure gradient, violently exploded due to the rapid and massive expansion of internal gases. All of his thoracic and abdominal organs, and even his thoracic spine were ejected, as were all of his limbs. Simultaneously, his remains were expelled with force through the narrow trunk opening left by the jammed chamber door, less than 60 centimeters (24 inches) in diameter. Fragments of his body were found scattered about the rig. One part was even found lying on the rig's derrick, 10 meters directly above the chambers.
    Now, this was a 6atm almost instantaneous decompression. Jumping into space would be at most a 1atm differential, so nothing like this is likely to happen. Gruesomely cool, though.