Slashdot Mirror


Surviving in Space Without a Spacesuit

Geoffrey writes "The recent movie Sunshine features a scene (echoing the famous scene in 2001: a Space Odyssey) in which two astronauts have to cross from one ship to another without spacesuits. But, can you survive in space without a spacesuit? Morgan Smith, writing in Slate, asks whether this is realistic, and concludes: "Yes, for a very short time.""

99 of 481 comments (clear)

  1. SG-1 had a similar scene by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the episode where they were experimenting with a captured ship, T'lk and O'Neill were flung out to Jupiter and left without a way to get home.

    Carter's dad, herself and Daniel are able to rescue them but the two have to eject from their ship and float in space for a few seconds before the ring transport can be used.

    I do believe that the two had a spacesuit of some type on but not one that was designed for space. More of a general cover suit.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by ucblockhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lots of SF shows have done it. Battlestar Galactica did it as well.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    2. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by d0rp · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also in an episode of Battlestar Galactica where the Cheif and Cally were trapped in a cargohold and they had to blow open the door and catch them with a Raptor.

    3. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by Mr.Fork · · Score: 4, Informative

      Didn't Chief and his wife (Cally?) have to go into hyperbaric chambers? I think that is the most accurate portrayal of recovery from space exposure. Didn't Outlander as well with Sean O'Connery deal with this too? I think the guy exploded from the inside out from rapid decompression - but I think that could of been a little Hollywoodish.

      I think that the injuries the dude form Event Horizon also were pretty real too - his eyes were damaged, frost, and the bubbling of gas from his blood "the bends".

      --
      Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. - Peter F. Drucker
    4. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by OriginalArlen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And let's not forget Event Horizon. (Hey! I wish I could forget EH... my friend had Sam Neill's decapitated bonce, with realistic gory holes where he'd supposedly torn out his own eyes, on her (street-facing) windowsill for months after working on the effects at Cinesite in London (next door to the Private Eye offices, trivia fans!) I believe he was usually used as a stand for sunglasses during the daytime... but I like to think he freaked a few people out after dark :)

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    5. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by Ucklak · · Score: 4, Funny

      I liked how Outland dealt with the subject; just have the guys explode making a mess in their spacesuit.
      Can you imagine being the next guy to use that suit?

      "Uh, sorry but Jeff thought that tarantulas were crawling in his suit so he pulled his air line and exploded. We cleaned it the best we could."

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    6. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by evanbd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your lungs can't contain the pressure if you try to hold your breath. And you can do a good enough job trying to destroy your lungs. I don't think you'd exactly explode, though.

    7. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've refrained from profanity, racial/ethnic epitaphs and am 5'11" - how can I be ranked as troll?

      You're probably getting modded as "-1 Troll" since there's no "-1 Illiterate moron" mod. Since I'm posting AC anyhow, here's a racial epitaph for you:

      Here lies a dead Chinaman. RIP

    8. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by profplump · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm with you on the exploding -- if you're caught in space you want to do everything possible to reduce your internal pressure.

      But it's not that cold in space. There's not a lot of ambient heat, but there's not a lot of conduction or convection either -- you only lose heat as fast as you radiate. So on the timescale of "holding your breath" the temperature of space is not a significant factor. Likewise the radiation you'd absorb over 60 seconds is likely not a large factor, unless you're particularly close to the source (I don't recall the episode, so I can't comment on their depiction of distance from the star(s)).

    9. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by amccaf1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So did an episode of Doctor Who. Only in that version, the Doctor is wearing just a spacesuit helmet without the rest of the suit. In addition, he gets stuck and ends up using a the momentum of throwing a cricket ball, bouncing it against an exterior wall of a spaceship and catching it to propel him in the direction he wanted to go. The physics are a little goofy, but it's probably the least goofy thing about that particular episode...

      (The wikipedia page even has a screenshot of the dubious exercise.)

      --
      "Flag on the moon. How did it get there?"
    10. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      Alien also had that scene, except with the alien, not with a human.

      I wonder what would be the effect of space engines an unprotected human in vacuum trying to get inside...

    11. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by orzetto · · Score: 4, Funny

      And the best quote from that episode was seconds before that, when Carter asked whether it was possible to transport them directly from the inside of the fighter:

      Carter Dad, can you beam them up?

      Jacob/Selmak Who am I, Scotty?

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    12. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, she said not to hold your breath- she was right. That's why they were practically turning blue after only a few seconds.

    13. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by Wookietim · · Score: 2, Informative

      So did "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" as Ford and Arthur are tossed out of a Vogon constructor ship....

      --
      http://timcol6.freehostia.com/
    14. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by AdamThor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      you only lose heat as fast as you radiate

      No, you'd lose heat as any liquid on your skin boiled away, wouldn't you?

      Also you'd pick up heat from the sun. You mention radiation, but not how much of it ends up as heat. Doesn't the space station actually require cooling to keep people alive? I don't know what the final balance works out as...

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    15. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by rev063 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And if you want some insight into the effects of truly extreme pressure changes on the human body (next to which the vacuum of space is peanuts) I recommend reading about the Byford Dolphin diving bell accident. Not for the squeamish.

    16. Re:SG-1 had a similar scene by thanatos_x · · Score: 4, Informative

      It really depends on how far away you are. I'd imagine anywhere much past earth and you aren't picking up a significant portion from the sun.

      Fortunately as the other poster mentioned, you have relatively little to worry about with the cold - although there is an extreme temperature difference, there's also a near vacuum, which makes heat transfer very difficult (it only happens through radiation, which may not be the kind you're thinking)

      The liquid on your skin would boil away, but it would boil at a very low temperature because of the low pressure. It's possible to have a pot of water boil at 33 degrees... (and probably much lower - look up a phase change diagram) Anyways, since the water on your skin would already be 'hot' enough to boil, I don't believe it would draw any heat from you.

      As far as the space station and heat/cooling, it's not the best example - everything depends on how it's positioned relative to the earth/sun. I'm sure it requires heating if the earth obscures the sun from it,and cooling if it's facing the sun... The lack of an atmosphere makes places like the moon change hundreds of degrees in minutes.

      Maybe that helps.

      --
      I am not an expert. If I am misled in something, please correct me.
  2. Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your breath by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative
    This has been dealt with many times before and there is even a case of a NASA tech who was exposed to vacuum in 1966. He lost consciousness in about 12-14 seconds and was regained consciousness without injury after they restored pressure at about 30 seconds.

    The conscensus seems to be consciousness for 10-15 seconds, no serious injury for 60 seconds to 2 minutes.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. next time by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 4, Funny
    good thing to remember next time you're in space:

    Of course, on Earth, you could hold your breath for several minutes without passing out. But that's not going to help in a vacuum. In fact, attempting to hold your breath is a sure way to a quick death.

    --
    An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    1. Re:next time by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I haven't RTFA'd yet- but IIRC, the "Asmovian" version of this required that for maximum survival, you had to hyperventalate (to maximize oxygen storage in the bloodstream), empty the lungs, and be in shadow since the sun puts out so much energy that without an atmosphere you risk a pretty bad sunburn.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:next time by faloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll file it along with "never eat a polar bear liver."

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    3. Re:next time by DaveCar · · Score: 3, Funny


      There's only really one person who might sit in the intersection of "been in space" and "reads slashdot", so unless Shuttleworth is reading this you just wasted a minute of your life that you will never get back ;)

    4. Re:next time by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Compared to all the other meaningful minutes we spend here all the time...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:next time by sconeu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thought was the "Clarke-ian" version. See his novel, Earthlight for a fairly reasonable description of ship-to-ship tranfer without suits.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:next time by Torvaun · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, live polar bear eats you!

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
  4. Spoilers by design? by rbanzai · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is it just me or does that Sunshine page prominently feature separate videos to show every single character dying? Is this some kind of gimmick?

    Usually I don't want to know how the movie ends until, you know... the end of the movie. //confused

    1. Re:Spoilers by design? by Renaissance+2K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a very odd marketing tactic. They have web banners using the tagline "EVERYONE DIES" on various Internet sites.

      But, the bigger question - which applies to all cold-hearted marketing drones - can we trust them?

      I saw the movie last Sunday. The tagline and the campaign aren't as cut-and-dry as they appear. The movie, however, is quite unfortunately the victim of a beautiful universe and an intriguing scenario hampered by a drier-than-sandpaper script and a "jump the shark" moment about 2/3 through the movie that will make everyone in the theater shake their heads disapprovingly.

  5. Battlestar Galactica by Eddi3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Chief and his wife also survived in open space for about 5-10 seconds on Battlestar Galactica, Season 3, "A day in the life".

    -Eddie

  6. You can survive for 30 seconds by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 5, Funny

    But the odds of being picked up by a passing space ship in that time are two to the power of 2079460347 to one against.

    1. Re:You can survive for 30 seconds by Thrakamazog · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and falling

    2. Re:You can survive for 30 seconds by retro128 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's why I always make sure there's a ship somewhere in the universe that has an infinite improbability drive before I jump out of an airlock without a space suit.

      --
      -R
    3. Re:You can survive for 30 seconds by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Funny

      It seems highly improbable that you could ever guarantee that...

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  7. 2001 Movie. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well in 2001 Dave wasn't in open space. He put his ship right next to the hanger doors creating as much as an airtight seal he could then he opened the door and all the air left his ship and filled the hanger area giving some pressure for him so his head doesn't explode but the air was rapidly thinning because it wasn't completly air tight so he only had a couple of seconds to get in. He wasn't in openspace but a low pressure envrioment, with only a few seconds of useful time.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:2001 Movie. by Sibko · · Score: 2, Informative

      He put his ship right next to the hanger doors creating as much as an airtight seal he could then he opened the door and all the air left his ship and filled the hanger area giving some pressure for him so his head doesn't explode but the air was rapidly thinning because it wasn't completly air tight so he only had a couple of seconds to get in. Heads do not explode in a vacuum. The only thing that does any 'exploding' are your lungs, as the air inside them tries to rush out of your body.
    2. Re:2001 Movie. by BRSQUIRRL · · Score: 2, Funny

      He put his ship right next to the hanger doors creating as much as an airtight seal he could then he opened the door and all the air left his ship and filled the hanger area giving some pressure for him so his head doesn't explode but the air was rapidly thinning because it wasn't completly air tight so he only had a couple of seconds to get in.

      Sounds like someone needs to take a deep breath. I'm suffering from oxygen deprivation just reading that sentence. :)

    3. Re:2001 Movie. by joshv · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seeing as how the easiest path to vacuum for air in your lungs would be through your mouth, not through your chest wall, I can't see any explosion happening. If you attempted to hold your breath during a transition to vacuum you probably feel something like a sharp kick to the chest/diaphragm as all the air is forced out of your lungs through your nose/mouth.

    4. Re:2001 Movie. by jcgam69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well when I took scuba they told us to always breath. Holding your breath and rising even a few feet would be enough pressure differential to rupture a lung. How good that data is I don't know and I am not going to find out. If you hold your breath while ascending during a dive you risk an air embolism, not a ruptured lung.
  8. low-pressure spaceship env. by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The decompression effects may be reduced/delayed if the space station uses a 100% oxygen atmosphere at a low pressure, then the pressure delta between what your body is equalized to and the vacuum is reduced so the trauma is delayed a bit.

    The ISS uses normal sea-level pressure, but I believe some of the spacecraft used for the moon shots used the low-pressure environment.

    1. Re:low-pressure spaceship env. by evanbd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's a bigger problem with that though -- if you lower the pressure of the atmosphere, but add more O2 to keep the partial pressure the same, you increase the fire hazard. Inert gases like nitrogen act as a buffer and reduce flammability. Fires in spacecraft are a big deal, which (I believe) is why ISS uses higher pressure.

      The major problem with exposure to vacuum isn't the pressure anyway, it's the lack of air. Furthermore, you can't hold your breath, because your lungs aren't strong enough to hold in the air. Without any air in your lungs, you get about 10-15 seconds of consciousness.

    2. Re:low-pressure spaceship env. by evanbd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, it's far from that simple. You can also get cases where you get combustion purely by diffusion, but the heat stays, so you have something that is very slowly smoldering... until a draft hits it and it flares up. There is some NASA data suggesting that flammability is a function of gravity, and that it seems to peak somewhere around 1/6G -- about lunar gravity. Things are less flammable either in free fall or Earth gravity. It will be interesting to see what fire precautions NASA ends up taking on the return to the moon flights.

  9. Space Activity Suit and more by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Space Activity Suit is basically the same as jumping out of an airlock, but with pressure protection for your head only. As they say in the wikipedia article - "skin itself is actually quite airtight"

    There was at least one sci-fi story back years ago where this jumping out into space thing was done. So it is not a new plot line.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  10. Also, on the Simpsons by Normal+Dan · · Score: 2, Funny

    two presidential candidates survived in space for a few moments after they were jettison from an alien space craft in a Halloween episode. I think. My memory is a bit fuzzy on this one.

    --
    A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
  11. Forget the big problem; important smaller problem by weak* · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe, but once they retrieve you, if your clothing needs to be removed for any reason (e.g. medical), you're going to have shrinkage like you just did the polar bear plunge... and all in front of your unreasonably hot female costar. :(

    --
    The Schwartz space ain't from Spaceballs.
  12. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by tonsofpcs · · Score: 4, Informative

    It would take nearly forever for you to cool off that much, you would explode due to pressure differential long before you would cool down, as any cooling would be due to releasing radiant heat. There is neither conductive nor convective heat loss as there is nothing cooler than you there, as there is nothing but you.

  13. 15 seconds? by vigmeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just expelled all the air out of my lungs as best as I could and it was exactly 24 seconds before it was physically impossible to hold my breath... I felt a weird kind of giddiness -almost a mild 'hit'. Sort of like when you smoke a strong cigar and inhale.

    Surely, astronauts ought to have better lung capacity than yours truly?

    Cheers!

    --
    Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    1. Re:15 seconds? by LandKurt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not only does vacuum mean truly zero air in your lungs, but your lungs are now working in reverse and dumping all remaining oxygen in your bloodstream into the vacuum. In just five or ten seconds the blood supplied to your brain is completely devoid of oxygen. That's what gets you.

    2. Re:15 seconds? by Ihlosi · · Score: 4, Informative
      The lungs can't 'extract' oxygen from the blood, can they?

      Lungs can't extract anything. Gas exchange in the lungs is purely driven by diffusion, which moves gasses from areas with higher partial pressure to those with lower partial pressure.

      In Earths atmosphere, the partial pressure of CO2 in your blood is higher than in your lungs, so CO2 moves from your blood to the air in your lungs. The partial pressure of oxygen is higher in the air in your lungs than in your blood, so oxygen moves from the air into the blood (where it oxygenates the hemoglobin in your red blood cells, thereby keeping the partial pressure lower than it would be, allowing more oxygen to be taken up by the blood than would be possible if the oxygen simply went into solution).

    3. Re:15 seconds? by LandKurt · · Score: 2, Informative

      As I understand it, lung tissue isn't a one way passage for oxygen and carbon dioxide, it simply equalizes the partial pressures of these two gasses between the air in the lungs and the bloodstream. Used venous blood has excess carbon dioxide and depleted oxygen relative to inhaled air, so the CO2 gets dumped and O2 gets picked up.

      In the case of a lung full of vacuum both CO2 and O2 would be dumped into the lungs. Pretty well cleaning out any and all gasses from the bloodstream, making the blood delivered by the arteries useless. I wonder if you'd last longer if your heart simply stopped right away.

      from http://www.sff.net/people/Geoffrey.Landis/vacuum.h tml

      "The time of consciousness after loss of cabin pressure is reduced due to offgassing of oxygen from venous blood to the lungs. Hypoxia is the most immediate problem following a decompression."

    4. Re:15 seconds? by Funkcikle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Surely, astronauts ought to have better lung capacity than yours truly?
      Try again whilst drunk.
  14. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But there is almost nothing to conduct the heat. You can survive a long time in 40F degree air. Now just in 40F degree water and see how long it takes before hypothermia sets in. The difference is conduction. There would be (almost) nothing to carry away your body heat in space.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  15. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by Zenaku · · Score: 4, Insightful
    As per the article:

    What about the frostbite? That's actually the least plausible result of Sunshine's suitless spacewalk. The cold wouldn't cause Mace too much harm in just 15 seconds, even if he encountered the very lowest temperatures in space. That's because heat leaves the body very slowly in a vacuum.
    --
    If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
  16. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by pegr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't forget about the extreme cold. Space is a very, very cold place. One might think frostbite could be an issue.
     
    It's not quite that easy. Space is not cold (nor warm). Things in space may be warm or cold. How do you lose heat in space? Well, there's no convection because there's no air. You would only lose heat via radiation, a much slower process. For the purposes of this discussion, I think you could ignore temperature, as you would perish well before a drop in heat got ya...

  17. About 30 Seconds by batquux · · Score: 3, Funny

    But with space being really big and all, the chances of being picked up within that time are 2^2,079,460,347 to one against.

  18. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    we should have a new mod: -1 RTFA

  19. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After he came to, they asked the tech what the last thing he remembered was. He told them the last thing he remembered before blacking out was the saliva on his tongue boiling away (due to the extremely low pressure lowering the boiling point of the saliva)

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  20. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly. The pressure differential is what will more likely kill you, though even that will take time, given the tension of cell membranes. Combine the temperature and pressure differential and you're looking at a short window of maybe 30 - 60 seconds where you get by without major physical damage and perhaps 1 - 2 minutes with some sort of major but survivable damage. And don't forget long term effects, as you will be exposed to intense solar radiation with only minimal protection.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  21. So did Farscape by coren2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So did Farscape ... and if it happened on Farscape, well its 100% believable.

    1. Re:So did Farscape by cerelib · · Score: 2

      So does that mean we can turn sperm whales into something like a cargo ship?

    2. Re:So did Farscape by coren2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes. That is why the US defense budget was $400Bil. They are creating Sperm Whale spaceships to fight the USSR.

    3. Re:So did Farscape by nschubach · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if they can materialize out of thin air and fall to their death at the planet's surface.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  22. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by AceJohnny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually no, frostbite isn't an issue. In vacuum, there is no heat transfer through convection. The only way to lose heat is through thermal radiation.

    Convection is what will freeze you when you fall in ice-cold water.
    Radiation is what will cool the beer you put in the reflective satellite dish at night.

    In fact, human space modules (such as the ISS, but the ISS has to cope with atmospheric drag too, IIRC), have trouble dealing with excess heat, and have to use large surfaces to maximize radiation output

    --
    Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
  23. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by jschrod · · Score: 5, Informative
    From http://www.sff.net/people/Geoffrey.Landis/vacuum.h tml:

    Would You Freeze?

    No.

    A couple of recent Hollywood films showed people instantly freezing solid when exposed to vacuum. In one of these, the scientist character mentioned that the temperature was "minus 273"-- that is, absolute zero.

    But in a practical sense, space doesn't really have a temperature-- you can't measure a temperature on a vacuum, something that isn't there. The residual molecules that do exist aren't enough to have much of any effect. Space isn't "cold," it isn't "hot", it really isn't anything.

    What space is, though, is a very good insulator. (In fact, vacuum is the secret behind thermos bottles.) Astronauts tend to have more problem with overheating than keeping warm.

    If you were exposed to space without a spacesuit, your skin would most feel slightly cool, due to water evaporating off you skin, leading to a small amount of evaporative cooling. But you wouldn't freeze solid!

    --

    Joachim

    People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

  24. Yup, this was a major factor in the Apollo 1 fire by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

    but I believe some of the spacecraft used for the moon shots used the low-pressure environment.
    Correct. Apollo used a 100% oxygen atmosphere at a lower pressure (I think 3 psi, which approximates the partial pressure of oxygen in normal air at sea-level). When they tested Apollo 1 on the ground, they decided to use 100% oxygen. But because the test was at sea-level, it was 100% oxygen at sea-level pressure. 100% oxygen at 3 psi creates a fire which burns just like regular air at sea-level. 100% oxygen at sea-level pressure creates an inferno.
  25. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by pclminion · · Score: 5, Informative

    It would take nearly forever for you to cool off that much, you would explode due to pressure differential

    No, you would not. Standard air pressure is about 15 PSI. Thus, being in vacuum can never apply more than 15 PSI to your internal organs, unless you came from a substantially pressurized environment.

    SCUBA divers experience sudden pressure changes in the realm of 15 PSI all the time. They don't "explode," they just get the bends. It's something you want to avoid, definitely, but you aren't going to blow your guts just because the ambient pressure drops by 15 PSI.

  26. A Serious case of YMMV by wsanders · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A long time ago I took a pressure chamber ride at NASA to 27,000 ft. I lasted about 15 sec until uselessness (the crew master didn't let us go all the way to LOC), and 27,000 is not a particularly extreme altitude. Generally, 50,000 ft is considered the altitude at which the partial pressure of oxygen is no longer adequate to maintain consciousness. You can survive up to about 80,000 if you "pressure breathe", i.e have a rig that forces oxygen into your lungs at a lightly higher pressure than ambient, but not enough to bust your lungs.

    And as TFA pointed out you will embolize if you hold your breath above that more or less 80,000 ft altitude.

    So if the acronum YMMV ever applies, it's here.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  27. Re:Forget the big problem; important smaller probl by SighKoPath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Like mentioned many times already, the cold is not the issue. It is the lack of pressure. So, wouldn't it be like using one of those vacuum pump devices? If so, clothing removal in front of your unreasonably hot female costar could be just what the doctor ordered, if she doesn't mind a bit of discoloration...

  28. ReJust luck none of the Mercury/Gemini burnt by redelm · · Score: 3, Informative
    Nope. Still can't use O2 at 3psia. No quench or blanketting effect from Nitrogen. Metals (esp aluminum) burns in 3 psia almost as fast as 14.7 . Plastics become similarly combustible.

    Combustion reaction kinetics aren't very pressure sensitive. Oxidant density is not controlling.

  29. Saliva boils! by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From TFA:

    "One NASA test subject who survived a 1965 accident in which he was exposed to near-vacuum conditions felt the saliva on his tongue begin to boil before he lost consciousness after 14 seconds"

    sounds like after a few seconds in empty space, things get painful and gross!

    --
    stuff |
  30. Wow, and TFA is wrong, too ! by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    At most, an astronaut without a suit would last about 15 seconds before losing conciousness from lack of oxygen. (That's how long it would take the body to use up the oxygen left in the blood.)

    First piece of BS. No, your body doesn't use up the oxygen left in the blood in 15 seconds. In a vacuum (or, more broadly speaking, in any condition where the partial pressure of oxygen is lower in the lungs than in the blood), the gas exchange in the lungs is reversed - your blood will actually become deoxygenated while passing through your lungs. After 15 seconds, your brain will get hit by a blood supply that is pretty much completely deoxygenated - it's lights out then.

    And then the part about air embolism - the pressure difference from going from the inside of a spacecraft (which is most likely pressurized at less than one atmosphere) to a vacuum is much lower than the pressure difference experienced by a scuba diver surfacing from a depth of, say, just 12 meters. "Vacuum" might sound nasty, but it's the pressure difference that is the problem here.

  31. Re:Umm... pressure? Fluids? by gedhrel · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not under zero pressure; it's inside the body. Fluids not contained in the body (on the surface of the eye, in the mouth) do begin to boil. As the article explains, you typically need to breathe out to avoid major damage to the lungs; but there's normally a small residual pressure in the lungs for a small while as the airways don't tend to stay open.

    This is not completely theoretical; there have been a few exposures to near-vacuum (on the ground).

  32. Three magic words: by Alsee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Explosive
    Evacuation
    Bowels.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Three magic words: by sanjacguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Explosive Evacuation Bowels. This would make for a nice little methane rocket - too bad it'd make totally crappy thrust.
  33. In space, nobody can.. by Plutonite · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..hear your frozen dick fall off.

    [The author of this post understands the negligible effects of loss of heat solely through radiation in extremely short time periods, but encourages the reader to take a break and try to laugh].

  34. Also Star Trek Nemesis by Omega · · Score: 3, Funny


    Data jumped from the Enterprise to the Predator without a suit (or anything other than momentum to carry him), but of course being an android he could probably better sustain the lack of air pressure, oxygen and severe UV exposure no problem. His big problem was the self-propulsion.
    </big_nerd_moment>

  35. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by paeanblack · · Score: 4, Informative

    It would take nearly forever for you to cool off that much

    Convection and conduction will be negligible. Net loss by radiation in outer space will be on the order of 400-500W. That will drop the average body temperature about 5 C / hr. Your skin will be in bad shape pretty quickly, but it will take a day or so to turn you into a popsicle all the way through.

    The joker here is evaporative cooling. Depending on the moisture on/in your skin/mouth/lungs, the human body cooling rates can sustain 10-20KW in a total vacuum. This is fatal within minutes.

    The secret to staying warmer when you find yourself naked in space is to keep calm. You don't want to be sweating.

  36. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by xenocide2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Really, I'd say conciousness for 10-15 seconds, and risk of death approaching 100 percent at 2 minutes, based on the link. Remember, the 2-3 minutes guy was examined by autopsy.

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  37. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by multi+io · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SCUBA divers experience sudden pressure changes in the realm of 15 PSI all the time. They don't "explode," they just get the bends. Yeah well, they never experience absolute pressures below 15 PSI though. Maybe your organs can withstand pressure loads better than tensile loads :-P

  38. Re:So why do astronauts bother with gloves? by jschrod · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you would have followed the link that I posted, you would have seen that this is not a text of mine but a citation from a NASA scientist.

    As he describes there, one would be unconscious within 10 seconds and would die within two minutes. This is known from experiments and accidents, not from estimations.

    But death won't be due to freezing, what the GP asked and why I posted the citation.

    --

    Joachim

    People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

  39. SPACE (from the late, great Douglas Adams) by eriks · · Score: 2
    SPACE

    If you hyperventilate and then empty your lungs, you will last about
    thirty seconds in the vacuum of space. However,because space is so
    vastly hugely mind bogglingly big, getting picked up by another ship
    within those thirty seconds is almost infinitely improbable.

  40. SCUBA / pressure on body by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm no genius on the subject, but isn't there the case that divers have significant "explosion" resistant forces due to the water they're surrounded by?

    Your body is mostly water, which doesn't really expand or contract due to pressure. Pressure is an issue with respect to the gasses in your lungs and blood. If external pressure is decreased (1) the air in your lungs will expand, doing so too rapidly can damage the fragile aveoli in your lungs where gas exchange with the blood occurs. (2) the air in your blood may come out of solution and form bubbles, much like opening a carbonated soft drink. Sorry, no explosion, just lungs filling with blood and/or arteries/veins being blocked by bubbles. Very bad for the diver, but terribly undramatic for TV and movies.

  41. Re:So why do astronauts bother with gloves? by modecx · · Score: 3, Informative

    1) The gloves are big and clunky because the suit is a positive pressure environment, they poof out (and apply resistance) to a degree proportional to the inside pressure. 2) While space isn't a cold or hot place (like other posters have said, you can't measure the temperature of nothing), there is an awful lot radiation in this part of our solar system--if you're not directly in the shadow of some object. So, space suit gloves, like the rest of the suit must have a shitload of insulation to keep the heat out. With the advent of better insulation, and skin tight suits that resist the pressure differential by mechanical means, suits will eventually become thinner, lighter and less clunky. Obviously, however, the hands present certain difficulties to space suit design, for many reasons.

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  42. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by bcattwoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    No. The pressure differential is all that matters. It makes no difference if the pressure differential is 30 PSI -> 15 PSI or 15 PSI -> 0 PSI.

    This isn't entirely true. Things are a little different as you begin to approach zero psi. At constant temperature, going from 30 to 15 psi, the volume of an ideal gas doubles. Going from 15 to 0 psi, the volume of an ideal gas goes to infinity.
  43. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by QuantumPion · · Score: 3, Informative

    There was an accident where divers in a decompression chamber were explosively decompressed from EIGHT atmospheres. Their bodies literally did explode, killing them instantly.

  44. SCUBA decompression is different by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Informative
    When a SCUBA diver decompresses, the important numbers to whatch are not so much the actual pressures as the ratio between the saturated and new pressure. A 15 PSI (1 atmoshere) change is not a problem on its own, you get that by changing depth by 10m/33ft.

    You can approximately halve your saturated pressure withouth getting bends. In other words, if you have suturated to 30m (4 atm), you can rise to 10m (2 atm) without bends. If you go to the surface you're quartering your pressure which is a Bad Thing.

    I've done a lot of SCUBA, some of it at high altitude (over 6000 ft). At 6000 ft, the surface pressure is far lower, so the effective decompression becomes a lot more complicated. A dive to 65m is equivalent to diving to 80+m at sea level.

    In space (0 atm or thereabouts), the ratios become far harder to maintain and you would not want to be in 0atm for very long.

    Bends is not something you'd want to piss about with. I know a few people who have had mild bends, even had very mild bends myself, but I also know a person who had pretty severe bends when he ran out of air at 40m or so. He was in hospital for a week or so and struggled walking for many months. In more serious cases people have died due to tissue damage in major organs/brain.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  45. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by dmpyron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can get a pulmonary embolism in 5 feet of water if you do it right (wrong?) It actually takes a lot of work to get bent. There are a number of barotrauma disorders. Most of them occur in the first 20 feet of water.

    I've been diving for over 20 years and teaching for over 10. One of the things I do for my advanced class on the deep dive is to fill a balloon to about 1/3 capacity at 100 feet and another to 2/3. Neither survives the ascent. The tennis balls crush, the hot and shaken soda doesn't fizz. And interestingly enough, it takes three or four times as long to solve simple puzzles, like opening combination locks.

    SR71 crew wore full up "space suits". At 100,000 feet, water at body temperature doesn't really boil, it sublimates, both boiling and freezing at the same time.

  46. Gah! Never cite Event Horizon for *good* physics! by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that the injuries the dude form Event Horizon also were pretty real too - his eyes were damaged, frost, and the bubbling of gas from his blood "the bends".

    You mean the scene where he's repeatedly screaming about how he can't breathe (while taking big gasping breathes) and we can hear him through the vacuum? Yeah, that's pretty realistic except that eye damage (especially like he suffered) and frostbite aren't normal symptoms of actual space exposure as the article states. Event Horizon's portrayal of vacuum exposure was only slightly more realistic than Total Recall's.

    Remember, this is the same movie where that same character poked his finger into a contained black hole and pulled it back out and where people had to get into acceleration couches to cushion them against high-G acceleration but left all their dirty dishes on the table and all their pictures pinned up to the wall.

    Event Horizon ranks up there with Starship Troopers and Mission to Mars as one of the worst suspension of disbelief destroying stinkers I've ever watched. You could drive a truck through the holes in the parts of the plot based entirely on bad physics.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  47. Duct tape by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Funny
    Lots. Wrap yourself up. Can't explode then.

    Couple of rolls sounds like a reasonable makeshift pressure suit.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  48. No, that's not right. by TrekkieGod · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, she said not to hold your breath- she was right. That's why they were practically turning blue after only a few seconds.

    Actually, she did did say not to exhale. The episode was "Disaster", Season 5.

    Crusher: "Once the air is vented, the first thing you'll feel is an extreme pressure on your lungs. You have to resist the temptation to exhale.

    TrekkieGod to the rescue!

    --

    Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

  49. Re:What about vision? by Verteiron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The moisture on your eyes would boil off within seconds and you'd probably be unable to blink. Your eyeballs would probably swell, too, making your vision even blurrier. And then as your brain lost oxygen, you'd start to see the green lights and tunnels that pilots see during high-G maneuvers.

    Note that I just made all of that up, but it's probably not too far from reality.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
  50. been there by starshining · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've done 4 spacewalks and during vacuum chamber training we open our suit purge valve, allowing the pressure in the suit to drop a bit (from nominal 4.3 psi) and I did feel the sensation of the saliva bubbling; it is similar to the sensation of soda pop on your tongue. I haven't seen the movies mentioned (other than 2001), but my guess about vacuum exposure is that you are more likely to be injured by the flying debris (including your own velocity as you impact a wall or whatever) associated with sudden decompression through a hatch than by a very short exposure to 0 psi. During one chamber run, I had a water line poppet valve stick open when I disconnected from the chamber wall. The water stream broke up into droplets that immediately froze, producing an impressive shower of ice particles. Over about 5 to 10 seconds, the icing point traveled up the water stream and formed a clump around the poppet valve, sealing the leak. Oh, by the way, I tried whistling while EVA and even the nominal suit pressure is too low to produce an audible sound.

    1. Re:been there by mehgul · · Score: 2, Informative

      So if I get it right, you play Go, hold both an MD and a PhD, have 5 patents and published numerous papers, and you were on the first mission to dock with the ISS, and have spent almost 26 hours in space.
      Quite some credentials if I may say so!

  51. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ummm... no, you wouldn't. You would be long dead before radiation would lower your body temperature significantly.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  52. Exploding from decompression by rev063 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the guy exploded from the inside out from rapid decompression - but I think that could of been a little Hollywoodish. I used to think of the human body exploding due to decompression being pure Hollywood, too, until I read this:

    Subsequent investigation by forensic pathologists determined that diver D4, being exposed to the highest pressure gradient, violently exploded due to the rapid and massive expansion of internal gases. All of his thoracic and abdominal organs, and even his thoracic spine were ejected, as were all of his limbs. Simultaneously, his remains were expelled with force through the narrow trunk opening left by the jammed chamber door, less than 60 centimeters (24 inches) in diameter. Fragments of his body were found scattered about the rig. One part was even found lying on the rig's derrick, 10 meters directly above the chambers.
    Now, this was a 6atm almost instantaneous decompression. Jumping into space would be at most a 1atm differential, so nothing like this is likely to happen. Gruesomely cool, though.
  53. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by glitch23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Space is not cold (nor warm).

    So what's this cosmic microwave background radiation I keep hearing about that is hovering around 2.7K and was once very very very very very hot about 14 million years ago? "Empty" space is a misnomer as even "empty" space still contains particles such as neutrinos and others that are emitted by stars. If particle physicists are correct, "empty" space is even permeated everywhere by the Higgs boson which is what gives mass to all particles (the Higgs "ocean", or field as is the proper term, is a little bit similar to the aether once thought to exist in the 19th century). Be careful with that webpage though because it mentions God which is a bad word here on Slashdot. Similar to a casino where there is always a camera watching you, in space there is always something keeping you company, even if you can't see it.

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  54. Re:Imagine drowning if you couldn't hold your brea by Magada · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In other words, The Hitchhiker's Guide gets it right again: DON'T PANIC!

    --
    Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  55. Post-exposure drugs could allow long exposures? by hughperkins · · Score: 2, Informative

    The primary cause of death in a vacuum is asphyxiation. So, the following article is relevant:

    Reviving the dead: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18368186/site/newsweek /

    It is asserted that cells do not die from lack of oxygen, but terminate themselves upon resumption of oxygen, because they have been preprogrammed to do so.

    It is proposed to give drugs to prevent apoptosis prior to reviving asphyxiated patients, then resume the oxygen supply. In theory this could allow survival after even several hours of being "dead" from asphyxiation.

  56. Re:You can go a lot longer than he claims. by Slashamatic · · Score: 2, Informative

    First I find this quite interesting because I'm a certified scuba diver where we are made to feel very aware of pressure differences. You are a free diver where you breath in air at 1 bar but then go down to where the water pressure is 2 or 3 bar.

    Holding your breath above water and not doing anything is relatively easy. The moment you start physical activity, then the O2 consumption goes up as you will have experienced free diving. Certainly I see the difference to my air-rate when scuba diving between drift diving (using current) and when I must actively swim.

    The times of 15 to 30 secs consciousness comes from the NASA vacuum chamber accident and also seems to relate what happened with Soyuz 11 when a valve used for equalising pressure just before landing was nudged open during undocking. Again the time to pass out was easy to determine.

    Holding your breath is another matter. The bits we use to physically close our tracha aren't really designed to hold back pressure from within the lungs and the nose doesn't seal (if it did, you would probably lose an eardrum). What normally holds air in the lungs is simply the pressure difference between what is inside the lung and the thoracic cavity. We change the dimensions of the thoracic cavity to breath using out intercostal muscles or our diaphram. In space the little air within the chest cavity would expand pushing air out of the lungs.

  57. Re:An answer from the eighties ... by foobsr · · Score: 2, Informative

    # Arthur C. Clarke (**), Earthlight (1955)
    # Arthur C. Clarke, "Take a Deep Breath" (1957)
    # Arthur C. Clarke, 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

    Submit to the tubes and be piped to the solution.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)