Slashdot Mirror


Imaging Breakthrough "Sees" Lung Disease

Roland Piquepaille writes "According to BusinessWeek, an Israeli startup, aptly named Deep Breeze, has developed a high-tech replacement for the 200-year-old stethoscope. This noninvasive device can draw, in seconds, an image of your lungs by listening to its vibrations. The Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) system could already be used in Israel, Europe and South Korea. Last month, the US Food and Drug Administration approved its introduction in the US. But don't expect to see one of these systems used by your local physician anytime soon. This VRI system will carry a price tag of over $40K."

3 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. Expensive? by knivesx11 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That really no where near the price of a MRI machine so I'm pretty sure that it is as capable as the article makes it sound than thats not that much to spend. Several hospitals in my area have spent 100+ million in renovations.

  2. Re:Costs by Da3vid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd say for ultrasound, the average would be to have a patient scheduled every 30 minutes. Also, a lot of people don't realize it... but you don't even need a bachelor's to be an ultrasonographer. Its an associate's degree.

  3. Fraud alert -- Possible fraud by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Note that imaging with sound generated in the lungs naturally is apparently not possible because the source and frequency of the sound cannot be known in advance. The use of the word "Imaging" is apparently fraud.

    The BusinessWeek article says, amazingly, begging the question, "Its sales prospects are not just hot air"

    Notice that, at present, there is no period at the end of that sentence, suggesting that the article received little or no attention from an editor.

    Slashdot has run several stories about companies that had products that they were supposedly trying to bring to market, but which, on close examination, apparently were just methods of collecting investor money, with no real hope of return.

    Roland Piquepaille, the author of the Slashdot story, is apparently paid to get articles in publications an on blogs. There has never been any information, that I know of, about whether he pays someone at Slashdot or Slashdot's parent company. His Slashdot stories apparently never note Mr. Piquepaille's affiliations with the companies being discussed.

    Slashdot has often been scientifically challenged. The Slashdot article The Car That Makes Its Own Fuel has a +5 moderated First Post that expresses the consensus of the comments on that story.