Slashdot Mirror


American Red Cross Sued For Using a Red Cross

Swampash sends us a story that even this community may find hard to believe. Johnson & Johnson, the health-products giant that uses a red cross as its trademark, is suing the American Red Cross, demanding the charity halt its use of the red cross symbol on products it sells to the public. It seems J&J began using the trademark in 1887, 6 years after the Red Cross was formed, but 13 years before the charitable organization was chartered by Congress. Lately the ARC has begun licensing the symbol to third parties to use on fund-raising products such as home emergency kits.

30 of 739 comments (clear)

  1. Switzerland by Tiberius_Fel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great, now Switzerland will get involved and claim that the red cross is obviously a derivative work of their flag...

    --
    Join the Empire! http://www.empirereborn.net/
    1. Re:Switzerland by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      the Swiss were already using a white cross in a red field.
      The french army liked the original and the inverse. They couldn't decide between them so they compromised on a white cross on a white field.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Radio Shack sues for circle-R use by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, Radio Shack plans to sue all companies that put a circle-R after their name. "Their trademark symbol is exploiting our trademark symbol" said aggrieved lawyers for the retailer.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  3. Re:I understand... by techpawn · · Score: 5, Funny

    As long as that "X" isn't a red one...

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
  4. Re:Actually this case is legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its too late guys. They won't read the article or have a clue what the real issue is. They'll just rant and rave about evil corporations. They read these stupid 'headlines' and then mouth off.

  5. Re:I understand... by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 5, Funny

    If JC came back, the last thing he'd want to look at is a fucking cross.

  6. Re:ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

    King Richard I didn't sell medical supplies. He was more into creating a demand for them.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  7. Re:I understand... by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Funny

    To much to bear?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  8. Cue the Godfather music... by SCSI-Wan · · Score: 2, Funny

    After all it is a family company...

  9. Re:Hey moron! by Thrip · · Score: 5, Funny

    NUNS DON'T FIGHT. No, they nurse their malice in secret, brooding in silence for decades if necessary, until the perfect opportunity presents itself. Then, they spring into action ...
    --
    I'm awake! The answer is BONK!
  10. Re:I understand... by phoenixwade · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I think I'll go with brand X". "Love that Joker"........
    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  11. Re:I understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wouldn't that be great if the next Jesus turns out to be a Jessica?

  12. Re:Leave it to kdawson to put on the spin by Binestar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its still non profit; the proceeds from the kids sold by the ARC go to disaster relief funds.

    As a parent I'm torn between feelings of outrage and a strange compulsion to donate my own children to the red cross...

    --
    Do you Gentoo!?
  13. Re:I understand... by bzipitidoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    JC would be informed that he can sue the both of them for violating His trademark. Adding some coloring isn't good enough.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  14. Re:Let the Swiss sue J&J by HeroreV · · Score: 3, Funny

    But... but... the Red Cross does good stuff! How could you possibly ever support suing such nice people?! They're non-profit, so they should get to do whatever they want! So what if they are blatantly violating the law and destroying a company's trademark! Once you've done that much good stuff, haven't you earned the right to go around knocking over whatever you want?!

  15. Re:I understand... by HansF · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thanks Bill Hicks:
    A lot of Christians wear crosses around their necks. Do you think when Jesus comes back he ever wants to see a fuckin' cross? It's kind of like going up to Jackie Onassis with a rifle pendant on."

    --
    --> Insert Funny Sig Here
  16. Re:I understand... by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 4, Funny

    But it would still be the last thing he sees...

    Moishe, get the nails! He's loose again!

  17. Just change the name by TheAxeMaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    To the American Red Plus Sign. See? Not a cross.

    1. Re:Just change the name by ari+wins · · Score: 5, Funny

      This just in. Jesus is suing both companies, stating his clear association with the cross as grounds for an ex parte decision on royalties owed. His lawyers were heard to be discussing another possible suit, dealing with defamation of product trust concerning the blood the ARC has been collecting. Turns out, getting a transfusion won't in fact clear you of your sins. More at 11.

      --
      Don't worry if you're a kleptomaniac, you can always take something for it.
  18. Re:Hey moron! by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 3, Funny

    They both wear the same outfit.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  19. Re:I understand... by kripkenstein · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think it was Philip K. Dick who said that, if Jesus had lived in our time instead of 2000 years ago, his followers would later be wearing little pendants of electric chairs, hang up large symbols of electric chairs in their churches, etc.

  20. Re:I understand... by MCraigW · · Score: 3, Funny

    They are all republicans until their republican ideals get in the way of their lust for power or money.

    Then they become democrats?

  21. Re:I understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What do you use K-Y for?

  22. Re:I understand... by theelectron · · Score: 5, Funny

    What do you use K-Y for?
    I hear it's a jelly, so for sandwiches? With peanut butter right?
  23. Welcome by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Yukon Pine Bark Corporation of Wilmington, DE welcomes your future patronage. Your satisfaction is our number one priority, that's why we fertilize our tracts of pine forest with only the highest quality African AIDS orphan bone meal.

    Signed,
    Dr. Jonathan Cody
    Yukon Pine Bark, LLC

  24. Re:You are missing the point. by Vaakku · · Score: 2, Funny

    J&J is going up against the Geneva Convention and International law. They are is not going to win this. That's easy one. J&J is going to declare ACR as enemy combatant.
  25. Re:I understand... by mweier · · Score: 3, Funny

    Stinks bad, but there's no residue and it isn't harmful at all to you nor the environment. ... Just like Hippies :)
    --
    digital artist, 3D animator, web designer, and otherwise technological creative type....
  26. Though I don't have a death-wish. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I read that it wasn't actually any better than normal chemicals, it just wouldn't kill you.

    Personally, that seems "better" to me.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  27. Re:It has many uses by TobyRush · · Score: 3, Funny

    That was the day I discovered (and could never un-discover) that you can buy K-Y Jelly (TM) in 5 gallon drums.

    If you ever do find out a way to un-discover that, would you let me know?

    --
    Sam! If you will let me be,
    I will try them.
    You will see.
  28. Re:I understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I shall kill you and eat you.