Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

DUI Defendant Wins Source Code to Breathalyzer

Posted by Zonk on from the one-way-to-fight-the-man dept.

MyrddinBach writes "CNet's Police Blotter column looks into a Minnesota drunk driving defendant case with a twist. The defendant says he needs the source code to the Intoxilyzer 5000EN to fight the charges in court. Apparently the company has agreed to turn over the code to the defense. 'A judge granted the defendant's request, but Michael Campion, Minnesota's commissioner in charge of public safety, opposed it. Minnesota quickly asked an appeals court to intervene, which it declined to do. Then the state appealed a second time. What became central to the dispute was whether the source code was owned by the state or CMI, the maker of the Intoxilyzer.'"

6 of 638 comments (clear)

  1. What I would do first by Kohath · · Score: 4, Funny

    grep it for "Boris Yeltsin"

  2. Source Code Revealed by fyrie · · Score: 5, Funny


    10 print "U R DRUNK!!!"
    20 GOTO 10

  3. Re:What about by Copperhead · · Score: 4, Funny

    This post is going to go in the dictionary under "begging the question".

    --
    Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
  4. I just love this quote by microbee · · Score: 4, Funny

    (his attorney, Jeffrey Sheridan, as saying) the source code was necessary because otherwise "for all we know, it's a random number generator."

  5. Language? by Bazman · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's it written in? Double Visional Basic? Lishp?

    Brainf**k maybe...

  6. Re:state==public domain? by clem · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...you'll probably get hit with wreckless driving....

    Yeah, I once had wreckless driving put on my record. My insurance premiums blew through the cellar.

    --
    Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.