Slashdot Mirror
Sun Lowers Barriers to Open-Source Java
Shyane writes "Sun Microsystems is making it easier for open-source programmers to ensure their Java versions meet the company's compatibility requirements, but the deal extends only to those involved in Sun's own open-source Java project. The program grants access to its Java Technology Compatibility Kit to anyone with an open-source Java project that is based substantially on Sun's open-source Java software and governed by the GPL. Programmers need access to the test kit to prove that a project is in compliance with the Java specification. Projects that pass Sun's compatibility kit tests also can use the official Java logos for free."
as programmers discover that the test suite only runs on Windows.
Cheers!
Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
Fortunately the GNU Classpath guys are right on board with OpenJDK. One of their most prominent members Dalibor Topic (who's the lead on the Kaffe VM) is on the OpenJDK governence board and works with Sun and other representivies on managing the project. Other promiment members like Roman Kennke, David Gilbert, Mario Torre and others. are active on the OpenJDK mailing lists and submitting patches. They are all interested in becoming regular contributors to the project.
Other GNU Classpath developers working for Red Hat were very quick to produce a version of OpenJDK using pieces of Classpath to fill the wholes of "encumbered" components that havent been open sourced (like the font, graphics and sound engines that were licensed by Sun by 3rd parties). This is called IceTea. Though its more of a quick 'n dirty temporary project to have a completely GPL JDK right now until the holes can be plugged properly. For example, Sun released a more sophistated FreeType based font engine this week, and the rest of the holes will eventually be filled. But for now, IceTea is a great playground for experimentation. And as far as I can tell, Red Hat wants to contribute anything useful back in OpenJDK.
You might that the GNU Classpath guys would be dissapointed, feeling that their hard work is obsolete, but no, they're happy because they know they were a big part of the reason why OpenJDK exists, and they're looking forward to contributing.
You gave your own grandma an iMac and then put Linux on it?
Why do you hate your grandma?
Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
"Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
I am a fledgling java developer, and so far I'm loving it! Every time I hear about the advances Sun is making towards GPLing java, the more I feel justified in taking the time to learn java.
I came into this business from a bit of a back door (although I suspect it to be a common back door these days). I started with spaghetti code PHP, moved to OOP php with php4, then php5. I am now quite frustrated by the partial OOP implementation of php5, as I develop more complex applications. I become even more frustrated with PHP the more I learn about java. The type safety at compile time makes it far easier to develop bug-free code. Method overloading is problematic in php, I usually end up implementing a single function with all sorts of optional arguments, and checks to determine whether a particular parameter is an array.
Additionally, Java gives me code re-use at it's ultimate. For instance, I write a single been that updates our LDAP; I then use that bean in a JSF web application, in a batch program running on an an IBM iSeries, in a command line application on Linux, and most recently in a Swing application. Having written the bean once when developing the first application, I never had to write a single LDAP query when developing my latter applications. Any bugs I find in the bean from one of the apps means the bug gets fixed for all the other apps.
Not to mention that I do my development on my Mac, and deploy software across our organization to Windows and Linux desktops.
Write once run anywhere for sure - I'm sold!
Failure #1: Java's compiler is written in Java. The first use of the early Oak/Java VM was to get the compiler self-compiling.
Failure #2: Java *can* bootstrap itself just fine, thank you very much.
http://www.jnode.org/
http://jikesrvm.org/
"A distinguishing characteristic of Jikes RVM is that it is implemented in the Java(TM) programming language and is self-hosted i.e., its Java code runs on itself without requiring a second virtual machine."
Failure #3: You called Java an interpreted language. Java is a compiled language that runs on a virtual machine. Like most VM-based platforms, that provides two options. The first is to interpret the bytecodes directly. The second is to compile the bytecodes into native code at runtime using a Just In Time Compiler. The most common JIT compiler for Java is the HotSpot VM. HotSpot is quite capable of keeping pace with and even exceeding the performance of native code.
http://www.idiom.com/~zilla/Computer/javaCbenchma
Failure #4: You see these things, yet you fail to take the time to understand them. You have failed as a geek. Turn in your member card immediately and leave in shame.
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade