Slashdot Mirror


Pico-ITX, Because Size Matters

An anonymous reader writes "It's not every day that a new form factor comes out, especially not one that is 10cm x 7.2cm. Despite its size, Pico-ITX is the hottest new thing in the rapidly changing small form factor market. It is considerably smaller than Mini-ITX (17cm x 17cm) which has proven itself to be quite versatile and though some sacrifices had to be made to shrink the platform, Pico-ITX is surprisingly complete. The system was tested with Feather Linux but the PX10000 has the power to run Windows XP or Ubuntu if you want to add on a hard drive."

36 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. But but but... by cyberjock1980 · · Score: 4, Funny

    All my ex girlfriends told me size DIDN'T matter. Of course, they'd dump me the same day... So this is news because size really does matter now?
    I'm in trouble cause i'm not 10cm x 10cm.

    1. Re:But but but... by rhyder128k · · Score: 3, Funny

      We've got a great new system that, while using no pills or pumps can take you all the way up to AT or even ATX in some case. Go on, do it for you gal!

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    2. Re:But but but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm in trouble cause i'm not 10cm x 10cm.


      You should be seriously concerned if any of your ex girlfriends had any use for a 10x10 cm thing.
  2. Units by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From TFA: A full-sized ATX motherboard is 12 x 9.6 (305mm x 244mm) and Mini-ITX is 17cm x 17xcm

    That's nice and clear, don't you think?

    1. Re:Units by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you can't convert mm to cm in your head, you should have your caregiver (who I assume typed your post and dressed you this morning) do it for you.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Units by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Had my "caregiver" typed my post for me, she would have noticed that the " symbols went AWOL during the cut and paste. Oops.

      My point, you blithering idiot, was that - in fact, no, it's too complicated for you. I don't want to hurt your poor little brain, especially after you've so recently converted from mm to cm.

      And, just for the record, I'm stark bollock naked, with only a laptop protecting my modesty. And I managed to put it there all by myself! So don't give me any of that crap about not being able to dress myself properly, either...

    3. Re:Units by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think that the fact that it appears longer than 10cm on the ruler is that the ruler is not on the edge closest to the camera taking the picture resulting in a different aspect ratio between the closest edge (the edge you can see in the picture) and the ruler itself. They really should have arranged the picture better.

      --
      I hate printers.
    4. Re:Units by Viadd · · Score: 4, Funny
      Just to clarify, the areas of the form factors are:
      ATX: 17.2
      mini-ITX: 7.1
      nano-ITX: 3.6
      pico-ITX : 1.78

      In microacres, of course.

    5. Re:Units by Bobartig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This should, under all circumstances, be unnecessary to say:

      When you publish information, you should endeavor to make it understandable and digestible. Thus, when demonstrating a relationship by using units of measure, it behooves you to use the same units for both quantities. We can all convert inches to mm, or cm to mm, or rod perch to furlongs if we really have to (ok, google will do that last one). The point is, we shouldn't have to, because the article writer should be humane and considerate.

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  3. if size matters by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Funny

    one would think they could keep it right in the article. The board is 10 cm x 7.2 cm - but they list it in the paragraph right before the second picture as mm instead of cm. i was going to comment on it there, but i'm not signing up for an account there just to do that.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  4. pirce & why not fanless? by pimpimpim · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I like this kind of stuff, but after comparing what building a system with this material would cost me, a mac mini would be way cheaper, and with the core duo in it, a heck of a lot faster as well.

    So it might be practical in embedded applications where the size matters (that thing is so small, incredible). But for those things, having a fan is big downer! Fan means: can break down, means: will break down, means: maintenance costs! Will there be a fanless version?

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    1. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by TodMinuit · · Score: 2, Informative

      PC/104 SBC boards are usually fanless and about the same size. Only the procesors on PC/104 boards tend to be underpowered. Example

      --
      I wonder if I use bold in my signature, people will notice my posts.
    2. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was wondering about that. You can get 4-600MHz ARM, SuperH, or PowerPC (with some form of GPU, usually PowerVR-based) based devices that are half the size of this board (think palmtop computers, mobile phones, etc) with passive cooling. Why does this run so hot? If you're running Linux, there's no reason to stick to x86.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by Alioth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The PC platform is quite awful for embedded stuff, power hungry and demanding (requires a big operating system) - it's unlikely to find its way into embedded platforms (except where the developer has a severe lack of imagination, or the production run is so small they have to use people with commodity skills to develop the code rather than those who know embedded systems). It's more likely to be used in small form factor PCs.

    4. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These things are pretty good and cheap: http://www.soekris.com/index.htm

    5. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by SuperQ · · Score: 3, Informative

      I setup a net4801 in a colo rack to route traffic for 20 vlans via 802.1q to a 48 port switch. Durring testing I was able to push 45Mbit of traffic through the system. I've got a couple of net5501's on order.. mostly I wanted more ram/CPU so I could try pushing BGP feeds to the soekris.

  5. Re:Because Linux driver support matters by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you read TFS (not even TFA), it said it was tested with Feather Linux, and could run Ubuntu if you added a hard drive.

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  6. Add a radio card by transporter_ii · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Add a radio card, an outdoor enclosure, and an antenna, and this might make a good access point that has a little more horsepower than your average AP.

    I wonder if Mikrotik will run on it? I think it should...

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  7. If size REALLY matters.. by superid · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... then I think I would try Gumstix for non-speed critical apps.

    1. Re:If size REALLY matters.. by pla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think I would try Gumstix for non-speed critical apps.

      Except, this board doesn't just target the non-speed-critical market.

      The Via C7 certainly doesn't compete with the latest offerings from Intel or AMD, but it does perform quite well for anything short of modern FPS games or hard-core number crunching.

      I have personally used it (the CPU, not that exact MB) as both a Linux fileserver and as an XP machine. For Linux, it works like a dream... Low heat, low power requirements, more than enough horsepower. For XP, it feels a little sluggish if you bog it down with a large number of tasks, but for web-surfing while listening to music, or even watching a DVD (almost almost all of VIA's MBs have hardware MPEG2 decoding, the newer ones support harware MPEG4 as well), it just does its thing without a problem.

      Also, don't overlook the benefit of using an x86-based CPU in a more-or-less PC-oriented form... We may all make fun of Intel's historical choice of that particular architecture, but everything supports it. As cool as we may consider a Gumstix, it pretty much locks you into using their expansion boards and their software (or their build tools).

  8. While we're at it by TodMinuit · · Score: 4, Funny

    Add a 500GB hard drive, NVIDIA GeForce 8800, 5.1 channel speaker system, and use it as your gaming machine!

    --
    I wonder if I use bold in my signature, people will notice my posts.
  9. Pretty small, but... by Bombula · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm no expert and I know this thing is tiny, but aren't laptop motherboards already pretty small? The motherboards in some of those tiny Sony Vaios must not be much bigger than this thing, and thinner too - and they've been around for a few years now.

    --
    A-Bomb
  10. For comparison... by pla · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's not every day that a new form factor comes out, especially not one that is 10cm x 7.2cm.

    Just as a basis of comparison, a typical full-height PCI card measures 15.5cm[*] x 9.5cm (not counting the external dangly bits or the actual PCI connector), making this entire motherboard half the area of most graphics cards.

    Or to put it another way, a laptop HDD measures 10cm x 7cm, making this MB just a hair bigger (Too close to call coincidence, I suspect Via chose the size based on that exact match).

    Not bad, as long as you need no expansion capability.



    *) They can actually get longer than that, I have an ancient one measuring 19cm long, but a quick glance at my box-o-obsolete-PC-parts shows 15.5 as the most common size for full-height cards).

  11. Ultra-Small MythTV Box by langelgjm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If there's a way to add TV tuner capability to it (I guess it would have to be via USB), I was thinking ultra-small MythTV box. It's certainly powerful enough for SD content, and I like the MPEG2/4 hardware decoding.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  12. MythTV Frontend? Is the Unichrome HD Capable? by tji · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This would make an excellent MythTV frontend.. Flash-based OS or Net-Boot. Small size, VGA or DVI output.

    The 1GHz VIA C7 would not handle HD decoding on its own.. it's not fast enough.

    But, the Unichrome features an MPEG2 decoder which offloads the CPU so that even the C7 could handle HD playback.

    The question is: Is the version of the Unichrome GPU in this thing HD capable? Unfortunately, most of the Unichrome GPUs are limited to 1024x1024, which is obviously not going to cut it for HD.

  13. Wow... by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where Are They Now? Episode 205:

    The 1.0GHz VIA C7 processor is not as powerful as something like a Core 2 Duo

    Captain Obvious, the washed up superhero, now works writing hardware reviews.

    --
    I hate printers.
  14. I just don't understand one thing by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why are these things always mentioned as possible solutions for a silent PC? They are NOT PC's. PC's are powerfull and can handle a ton of storage and are easily expanded. These things are not.

    No I do NOT question the usefullness of these things for certain tasks, but if you want a full PC that is 100% silent, might I offer a different solition instead? It too involves size.

    Make your case big. The simplest way to prevent noise from inside a PC reaching your ears is to use thick walls, and to force the sound to take the long way out. An even simpler solution is to use the layout of your house to put even more distance between you and the PC. My own PC is standing on the balcony, the wires going through the wall. Outside it sits in a thick wooden casing, with it basically having a small case at the bottom that sucks air in from the front and back and up into the main casing were I have put the PC itself (in my own layout) and then a similar case up above that blows the air out. The two fan cases force the air around several walls to break up the soundwaves.

    Result, soundless operation, I already picked quiet fans and the sound walls hide even their small amount of noise coupled with tremenedous cooling with no sacrifice on the components used for the PC itself. Regular Core 2 Duo, regular memory, and far too many HD's to hold all my porn eh business data.

    While this mini-boards occasionally tempt me, I always end up with the simple fact that they just don't have the raw power I would need. Take using it as a movie player, how the hell are these things supposed to do highdef? That can bring a fullsize system to its knees? As for who would want to use a desktop with less then 2 gigs of memory, do you like pain? (2 gigs is a bit of overkill perhaps for linux but I hate swapping. Swapping means the terrorists have won!)

    So nice board, intresting and all, but IF you are thinking about wanting a silent PC, consider instead in using regular hardware but an un-regular encasing. Size indeed matters and trying to make a 2mm thin metal encasing silent is doing things the hardway. 22mm wood, with isolation that is what makes a manly PC. Leave the tiny pc's for the japanese.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:I just don't understand one thing by hypnotik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or you could do what I am doing..

      Build a big honking PC to sit off in a closet, or basement or somewhere far away where you can't hear it, then build a small, noiseless mini-ITX or smaller box that connects via gigabit ethernet and acts as a thin client. These have more than enough power to play music, dvds, etc local, and even surf locally. Most other apps get run off the server.. Even 100baseT is fast enough, but gigabit gives that extra little to make things seemless.

      Best of both worlds... Unless you want to game, and then you buy a console..

      --
      (I was only an egg, but then I cracked)
  15. Re:price & why not fanless? by johnrpenner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    this thing STILL has those !@#% PS2 keyboard and mouse connectors -- ugh. any small motherboard that still wastes circuitry for PS2 connectors for keyboard (instead of USB keyboard and mouse) is less desirable (imho).

    once you add up the costs of the REQUIRED USB Optical Drive, adding the IDE drive, its not so far to the mac mini -- which certainly has better graphics performance. if you get a used mac mini -- price should be within range.

  16. drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by johnrpenner · · Score: 4, Insightful


    | Despite the size, the specifications make it clear that the ITX motherboard
    | has a full range of connections, including DVI, VGA, ethernet, four USB ports,
    | two PS/2 connections and more.

    we do not want a 'full range' of connectors -- because anything that wastes circuitry
    for PS2 connections on a pico size board is a dodo (imo).

    we DO NOT WANT: IDE, PS/2 or VGA connectors cluttering up our motherboard.
    they duplicate functions already better achieved with: SATA, USB, and DVI.
    we want as few ports as possible and still be able to achieve any function.
    so, what ARE the desireable ports?

    -USB 2.0 (four ports)
    - SATA (two ports)
    - DVI (with optional VGA header)
    - SODIMM Slot for RAM (two)
    - ethernet (10/100/1000)
    - optional 802.11g/n

    that's it -- no extra ones besides that.
    get the bios working so it can boot with those,
    and drop the legacy cruft.

    j

    'Everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler' (Einstein)

    1. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by screeble · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No serial ports?

      They say a lot of things but that's the stupidest thing I've heard all week. Connectivity of the "most common denominator" is lost with your collective desires, "We." IDE, PS/2 and VGA connectors are not legacy ports. They are standards that should be maintained because SATA, USB, and DVI do not duplicate and/or replace the functionality of the ports you wish to remove.

      Yesterday I used a null modem and minicom to connect two systems via ttyS0. One of the boxes faces the internet and I don't want it to have IP-based login capabilities so that there is no risk of toll fraud. On many of my other servers I use PS/2 and VGA connectors with IP KVM's all the time for cheap OOB management.

      I would not purchase a mobo w/o those connectors. They're a standard and NOT cruft. I'm looking at this from a server perspective though.

  17. Still waiting for Femto-ITX by ezdude · · Score: 4, Funny

    I need a new mobo for this cool wrist watch I'm designing...

  18. Warning against VIA EPIA motherboards by Grue · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I picked up a Mini-ITX for use as a MythTV box a few years ago. It was an EPIA Nehemiah M10000, and from the day I started using it all I had were problems. Do a search for VIA EPIA and DMA and you'll see what I mean. They released several flash updates for the BIOS, but they never seemed to fix the actual problem. Maybe they did finally figure out the issue, but if they did, they never told the user community.

    The feature set was nice. Built in MPEG2 decoder, 5.1 audio, ethernet and 3D acceleration. But the constant hardware lock-ups made the machine unusable. Finally, it started rebooting more and more often, and then just died.

    There are a ton of other manufacturers of SFF machines out there, my suggestion is to purchase from a company that will support you after they sell you a machine.

  19. Poor cable management by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A basic problem with this thing is that they just bring out the connections to header connectors. So you have all the internal mess of a regular PC, crammed into less space.

    It would be more useful in the PC market to have a board with roughly the same footprint as a CD or DVD drive, with all the external connectors on the back edge of the board. Get rid of all those internal jumper cables. If the thing is going to go in a box with a CD or DVD drive, there's not much point in making it smaller than the drive. I realize this is more or less an Intel Mac Mini. At that density, you have to have integrated design of board, packaging, and airflow.

    The Mac IIci, over a decade ago, was the first machine to get this right. No internal cables. Even the power supply clicked into the motherboard. The machine was designed for automated assembly, instead of low-wage assembly.

  20. Not new. Via EPIA products are out there. by CFD339 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use them. They're big in "THIN CLIENTS".

    For a project of mine, I need a small data collection PC to be used in the field. I use thin client machines based on the same chip. I pay under $500 for a machine finished nicely with reasonable video, sound, usb, network ports, mini-pci for wifi, and a big heat sink on top. There is no fan in the unit, and it uses flash ram instead of a hard disk. Mine come with 512megs of ram, windows XPe, and 1gb of flash drive for storage. With no moving parts they last a long time, and the use about 20 watts of power rather than about 220 for a typical desktop pc.

    They are also available (cheaper) with linux embedded, but in my case the app they run is written for XP and until I have time to re-write it, that's what I need.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  21. DIY case. by Mal-2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The answer in the short term to the lack of cases for the job is very simple: Lego and superglue.

    This has always been an option for any form factor, but of course it quickly becomes impractical as Lego does not scale all that well when strength is a concern. With a motherboard this size though, the hard drive or optical drive are going to be the constraint on how small the case can be.

    Another viable option is to use a case designed for an optical drive. Once the supplied electronics are gutted (and possibly used elsewhere), it should be possible to shoehorn this board, a 3.5" drive, and a slimline optical drive in there. All you'd have to hack would be the front and back panels, which is pretty trivial with Lexan and a rotary tool.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.