Slashdot Mirror


NASA Finds Star With a Tail

Andrew Stellman writes "NASA astronomers held a press conference announcing that a new ultraviolet mosaic from NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer shows a speeding star named Mira that's leaving an enormous trail of "seeds" for new solar systems. Mira is traveling faster than a speeding bullet, and has a tail that's 13 light-years long and over 30,000 years old. The website has images and a replay of the teleconference."

7 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Dropping seeds all over the universe? by thePsychologist · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've seen all ~70 episodes of The Original Series and all the movies, and I've no idea where the Kirk-sleeping-with-every-girl-he-could-find thing started. I mean, he showed some interest here and there but that's it.

    --
    "What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us." Ralph Waldo Emerson
  2. Faster than a speeding bullet? by SamP2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Newsflash: Our own Sun's velocity is 217 km/s (relative to the galactic center) and 20 km/s relative to the average speed of neighboring stars.

    For comparison, a "speeding bullet" slugs anywhere from around 1km/s (sniper rifle) to ~100m/s (short-barrel pistol).

    In addition, Wikipedia states that Mira's velocity is 63.8km/s -- which is actually slower than our own's sun (which has no "tail"), leading to two conclusions: (1) Mira's tail is caused by some other factor than it's velocity alone, and (2) Mira's speed is also so faster than a "speeding bullet" beyond comparison. In other words, the comparison is not just off-scale but also irrelevant.

    If you insist on using laymen's "cool-sounding" metaphors to describe scientific phenomena, at least check your facts and context, or you will just make a moron out of yourself.

    1. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The even sadder thing is that I don't think it's the NASA guys that are this dumb, but rather the target audience that NASA expects. To the general population, bullet-fast, sound-fast, planet orbit-fast and light-fast, all amount to one thing, "really fast". Give them a number and they won't know what to do with it, but throw a completely off-the-wall metaphor, and they'll think "wow this is cool".

      Oh the irony.

      The fact is that the star is actually traveling well within an order of magnitude of mach 1 in the interstellar medium, which is ~100km/s, so using the speed of sound as a reference is entirely appropriate. Only 'ignorant people' wouldn't realize that the speed of sound depends on the medium in question, and would compare the speed of sound in earth's atmosphere (at any altitude) to that in interstellar space.

    2. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by SamP2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      May I ask for a reference to your statement that the speed of -sound- in interstellar medium is ~100km/s?

      For all I know, the speed of sound in a medium increases with a medium's density. Pure vacuum transmits no sound at all. The speed of sound in water is much faster than that in the air.

      Note that I'm referring to -sound- specifically, rather than any other form of transmitted waves (subatomic radiation, whether beta or gamma, for example stellar pulses, and the like, are not "sound" in their own right, even though they can be CONVERTED into sound). Sound (and the use of the word "sonic") refers to waves in molecular matter, not subatomic particles. Extremely low density medium will result in longer interaction time between individual molecules, and thus, if any sound is possible it all, it would be much slower (and with much lower frequencies as well).

  3. Relative to what? by mukund · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mira is traveling faster than a speeding bullet, relative to what object?

    --
    Banu
  4. This seems really wrong... by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Insightful
    TFA did speak:

    Mira is traveling faster than a speeding bullet, and has a tail that's 13 light-years long and over 30,000 years old.

    Hrrrmmm. OK. So, a light year is about 5,879,000,000,000 miles.

    So, 13 light years would be 76,427,000,000,000 miles.

    Now divide that by 30,000 years and we get 2,547,566,666.667 miles. now there are 8,760 hours in a year, so if we divide 2,547,566,666.667 by 8,760, we get 290,818.113 miles per hour. Now, that IS fast, especially given the average asteroid skips along at 40,000 mph. But it's not THAT fast - it would take that star an hour to go from here to the moon. If it did it in 5 minutes - yeah, that's fast. But an hour? Heck - our feeble crappy spacecraft get there in a few days...

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  5. Appears to have an orbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The tail is curved, so this thing is likely in a super large orbit? (Around WHAT?!) Hopefully it can be tracked from here-on.