Slashdot Mirror


NASA Finds Star With a Tail

Andrew Stellman writes "NASA astronomers held a press conference announcing that a new ultraviolet mosaic from NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer shows a speeding star named Mira that's leaving an enormous trail of "seeds" for new solar systems. Mira is traveling faster than a speeding bullet, and has a tail that's 13 light-years long and over 30,000 years old. The website has images and a replay of the teleconference."

47 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Dropping seeds all over the universe? by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 5, Funny

    Name this star Kirk.

    1. Re:Dropping seeds all over the universe? by Speed+Pour · · Score: 2, Funny

      just trying to get a piece of tail

      Forgive me, the joke is obvious, but it had to be made

      --
      - Nobody would know what RTFA meant if it didn't need to be said all the time
    2. Re:Dropping seeds all over the universe? by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've seen all ~70 episodes of The Original Series and all the movies, and I've no idea where the Kirk-sleeping-with-every-girl-he-could-find thing started.

      I think it started with the urge to deny the existance of Kirk-Spock sexual tension...

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    3. Re:Dropping seeds all over the universe? by kalidasa · · Score: 4, Informative

      Roddenberry's intro to the novelization of Star Trek: The Motion Picture responds to the whole Kirk/Spock sexual tension thing in Kirk's voice with a disclaimer to the effect of (I'm paraphrasing from memory, and I read the book when it came out): "there's nothing wrong with two men being attracted to each other, but if I were to go in that direction, I think I'd choose a sexual partner who was interested more often than every 7 years." I can think of three women Kirk certainly slept with of the top of my head: the slave girl in Bread and Circuses, Miramanee, Carol Marcus; and there are a lot of probables.

    4. Re:Dropping seeds all over the universe? by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      >>I've seen all ~70 episodes of The Original Series and all the movies, and I've no idea where the >>Kirk-sleeping-with-every-girl-he-could-find thing started.

      >I think it started with the urge to deny the existance of Kirk-Spock sexual tension...

      What sexual tension?

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    5. Re:Dropping seeds all over the universe? by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Informative

      They haven't just named the star. Mira was named near the middle of the 17th century because its brightness varies so much. It and Algol are probably the first two variable stars discovered.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    6. Re:Dropping seeds all over the universe? by Bemopolis · · Score: 3, Informative

      I started a list, but rather than underline my geek-dom of All Things Trek, I'll just demonstrate a mastery of Some Things Interweb:

      Kirk's Bedpost Notches

      In my defense, there were a couple that even I couldn't remember.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    7. Re:Dropping seeds all over the universe? by SL+Baur · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've no idea where the Kirk-sleeping-with-every-girl-he-could-find thing started. You must be new, that's how things were filmed then. The first ever inter-racial (ie black-white) kiss was on classic Star Trek.

      Roddenberry deliberately pushed the envelope whereever he could. Sulu, Chekov on the bridge, etc. The only way a woman could get on was to be married or be mistress to him - Nurse Chapel was his wife, Uhura was his mistress and so was the (can't remember her name and my own videos of the classic series are not handy) blonde babe ensign who was in Charley, etc.

      Type M-x praise-be-unto-xemacs into your nearest sound-enabled XEmacs window. That (fair use!) snippet is from the episode where Kirk fathered a child with the American Indian-like people.

      How is he fathering children if he isn't spreading his seed all over the galaxy?
    8. Re:Dropping seeds all over the universe? by Agripa · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is in my 1979 Pocket Books edition on page 22:

            *Editor's note: The human concept of friend is most nearly duplicated in Vulcan thought by the term t'hy'la, which can also mean brother and lover. Spock's recollection (from which this chapter has drawn) is that it was a most difficult moment for him since he did indeed consider Kirk to have become his brother. However, because t'hy'la can be used to mean lover, and since Kirk's and Spock's friendship was unusually close, this has led to some speculation over whether they had actually indeed become lovers. At our requrest, Admiral Kirk supplied the following comment on this subject:
            "I was never aware of this lovers rumor, although I have been told that Spock encountered it several times. Apparently he had always dismissed it with his characteristic lifting of his right eyebrow which usually connoted some combination of surprise, disbelief, and/or annoyance. As for myself, although I have no moral or other objections to physical love in any of its many Earthly, alien, and mixed forms, I have always found my best gratification in that creature woman. Also, I would dislike being thought of as so foolish that I would select a lover partner who came into sexual heat only once every seven years."

  2. Collision Course by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, when does it hit Earth? Have they made the movie yet?

    --
    --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    1. Re:Collision Course by kypper · · Score: 4, Funny

      Someone better call Bruce.
      Campbell or Willis?

      I'd prefer the former; it would be... groovy.

  3. The NASA folks must have been watching bad films by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    They describe it as traveling at "supersonic" speeds when they should know there is no sound in the vacuum of space.

    They should tell us how many parsecs it could do the Kessel run in.

  4. NASA discovers G-class star 8 light minutes away by slyborg · · Score: 4, Funny

    What a terrible headline and linked article. Mira is a famous red supergiant, the "name-star" of the Mira-class variables. Mira is one of the largest known stars and has been known to astronomers for at least 400 years.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mira

  5. Re:NAME IT SKYWALKER AND STOP BEING AN ASSFAGGOT by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only if it wanted to drop seeds on it's sister star.

  6. Faster than a speeding bullet? by SamP2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Newsflash: Our own Sun's velocity is 217 km/s (relative to the galactic center) and 20 km/s relative to the average speed of neighboring stars.

    For comparison, a "speeding bullet" slugs anywhere from around 1km/s (sniper rifle) to ~100m/s (short-barrel pistol).

    In addition, Wikipedia states that Mira's velocity is 63.8km/s -- which is actually slower than our own's sun (which has no "tail"), leading to two conclusions: (1) Mira's tail is caused by some other factor than it's velocity alone, and (2) Mira's speed is also so faster than a "speeding bullet" beyond comparison. In other words, the comparison is not just off-scale but also irrelevant.

    If you insist on using laymen's "cool-sounding" metaphors to describe scientific phenomena, at least check your facts and context, or you will just make a moron out of yourself.

    1. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by speedy.carr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even worse than the speeding bullet part is the section on this page(last paragraph) where it says that 'Coincidentally, Mira and its "whale of a tail" can be found in the tail of the whale constellation.' I think NASA just likes making dumb jokes and references in their media announcements.

      --
      Surrealism: You have two giraffes. The government pays you to take harmonica lessons.
    2. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by Kelz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well anyway, the real question is:

      Is it more powerful than a locomotive?

    3. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by sholden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wikipedia may state that, the NASA press release claims it's travelling at 130 km/s, doesn't say what that's relative to but I would suspect the neighbourhood average (since there's a bow shock it has to be relative to that I would assume). Of course is could be relative to the ether and NASA keeping a rather large change in physics to themselves...

      Also note that NASA used the term supersonic.

    4. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by DeadChobi · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the REAL question is: Will it blend?

      --
      SRSLY.
    5. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by sholden · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, because when they say supersonic they couldn't possibly mean oh I don't know faster than the speed of sound...

      You know the speed that pressure changes can propogate through a fluid (such as the not-quite-vacuum intertelar medium around the star). That speed in which there's a change in the physics due to the formation of a shock wave (because the object is traveling faster than the pressure shift that "tells" the "upstream" fluid that the object is there).

      100km/s or there abouts - depends on the local density of the interstellar medium.

    6. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by Hugonz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How many football fields would 13 light-years be?

    7. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by antic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd say that it increases the chances of the story getting picked up by newspapers. I'm sure they could've provided a bit more on that single page for that end of the paddock and others?

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    8. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by Adambomb · · Score: 2, Informative

      91.44 meters: length of an American football field, excluding end zones.

      1 light year = 9.4605284 × 10^15 meters.

      so 103461596675415.57305336832895888, or one hundred three trillion, four hundred sixty-one billion, five hundred ninety-six million, six hundred seventy-five thousand, four hundred fifteen-ish football fields per light year.

      which makes 13 light years 1345000756780402.4496937882764654, or one quadrillion, three hundred forty-five trillion, seven hundred fifty-six million, seven hundred eighty thousand, four hundred two-ish football fields.

      wow, slow night.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    9. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by Adambomb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Realized i forgot to account for the rest of the world.

      For Soccer Fields:

      Fifa approvable fields must be between 100m and 110m in length.

      so from 1229868692000000 to 1118062447272727.27, or one quadrillion, two hundred twenty-nine trillion, eight hundred sixty-eight billion, six hundred ninety-two million to one quadrillion, one hundred eighteen trillion, sixty-two billion, four hundred forty-seven million, two hundred seventy-two thousand, seven hundred twenty-seven fifa approved soccer fields.

      reaalllly slow night.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    10. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by SamP2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      May I ask for a reference to your statement that the speed of -sound- in interstellar medium is ~100km/s?

      For all I know, the speed of sound in a medium increases with a medium's density. Pure vacuum transmits no sound at all. The speed of sound in water is much faster than that in the air.

      Note that I'm referring to -sound- specifically, rather than any other form of transmitted waves (subatomic radiation, whether beta or gamma, for example stellar pulses, and the like, are not "sound" in their own right, even though they can be CONVERTED into sound). Sound (and the use of the word "sonic") refers to waves in molecular matter, not subatomic particles. Extremely low density medium will result in longer interaction time between individual molecules, and thus, if any sound is possible it all, it would be much slower (and with much lower frequencies as well).

    11. Re:Faster than a speeding bullet? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps an easier way of representing it is that if each football field was represented as a library of congress you would need 11,208,339 of them

  7. Re:The NASA folks must have been watching bad film by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They describe it as traveling at "supersonic" speeds when they should know there is no sound in the vacuum of space.
    Actually, there is interstellar dust that can propagate waves. Any medium that can propagate waves has a "speed of sound", but the sounds that travel through that dust are beyond a human's hearing range.
  8. Am I the only one... by SoapBox17 · · Score: 2

    Who immediately thought of Jiminy Cricket?

  9. God says this is Impossible by EEPROMS · · Score: 2, Funny

    [sarcasm] PFFFT!!..Everyone knows this is impossible, how can a star have a tail 30,000 light years in length when the whole of the Universe is only 10,000 years old [/sarcasm]

  10. That's Funny ... Stellarium by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's funny. I just looked Mira up on Stellarium, and no matter how far I zoomed in, I couldn't find any trace of a tail at all.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  11. Relative to what? by mukund · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mira is traveling faster than a speeding bullet, relative to what object?

    --
    Banu
    1. Re:Relative to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      A speeding bullet, duh.

  12. Oh, neat, you can see the bow shock by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reminds me of this Benford story. Call it the Bullet!

  13. You can't see the tail with your eyes by Dekortage · · Score: 3, Informative

    Read the article, bottom of the page: "Mira's tail is only visible in ultraviolet light, and does not show up in visible light."

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:You can't see the tail with your eyes by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      Read the article, bottom of the page: "Mira's tail is only visible in ultraviolet light, and does not show up in visible light." The same holds true for Karl Rove.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  14. The song remains the same by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pseudo-comet star, that is what you are
    Flying at supersonic speeds
    Though sound cannot propagate through a vacuum
    Tail lightyears long through outer space
    We know TFA will get the science wrong uh huh
    And the dupe will posted in a week uh huh

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  15. More powerful than a Wikipedia entry by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Funny

    Relax, I just edited the article on ballistics; now projectiles are fast enough so that these stars are in the ballpark as far as their velocities go.

    Hmm, I guess I better edit the article on stadiums so that they can accommodate solar-massed objects while I'm at it.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  16. But how long in football fields? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I understand the speeding bullet thing, but could someone please explain the tail length to me in terms of football fields? I'm having trouble visualising it.

  17. Scientist as Educator by DynaSoar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I usually choke when journalists do a bad job presenting science. Sometimes the tables get turned, and they quote exactly what's said. Unfortunately. So, in the spirit of equal chain jerking:

    From TFA as presented on MSNBC: "If Neanderthal man had ultraviolet eyes and could look above the atmosphere, he could have seen the beginning of this tail forming," study leader Chris Martin, an astronomer at the California Institute of Technology, said during a teleconference Wednesday.

    AWEsome, d00d.

    And, if they had ultraviolet eyes on 30,000 light year long eye stalks, they could not only see
    above the atmosphere, they could see the tail as it formed, RIGHT WHERE IT WAS HAPPENING.

    OH. OH. And if the DINOSAURS had ultraviolet eyes, and could see above the atmosphere, they could see it 65 million years BEFORE it happened. And they could probably also see that asteroid coming and build SPACESHIPS, no wait, SPACE DINOSAUR MOTORCYCLES, they could get off the planet before it got hit, and fly to that star and live there, and then 65 million years later all wag their tails at the same time and make the star shoot off gas and dust like a BIG TAIL that we could see, because they wanted to say hi and let us know they were all OK and we shouldn't be all sad because we thought they all got extincted.

    I guess we can't all be Carl Sagan. Because then there would be BIL..... nevermind.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  18. Re:The NASA folks must have been watching bad film by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Whether you believe the writers thought this when they wrote it is another issue altogether.

    According to the script, they (Lucas) knew it and knew Solo was wrong. From http://www.blueharvest.net/scoops/anh-script.shtml (A New Hope script):

    HAN: Fast ship? You've never heard of the Millennium Falcon?

    BEN: Should I have?

    HAN: It's the ship that made the Kessel run in less than twelve
    parsecs!

    Ben reacts to Solo's stupid attempt to impress them with
    obvious misinformation.


    Emphasis added...
    -Trillian
  19. Broadcast quality video by mattr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Did anyone notice this in tiny print? Usually NASA mentions satellite transponders but now (at least first time I noticed) they are mentioning Pathfire.

    Pathfire was bought out by DG Fast Channel in June. It seems they sell servers maybe and services too. It looks like what people call video press releases.

    Anyway is this a commercial service only open to news agencies? Anybody know?
    It doesn't make any sense, NASA should just dump it all onto a torrent so it can be watched with one of the new torrent film players that advertise open video, like Zudeo or Miro. I spent so much time once upon a time with CU-SeeMe to see NASA live video, and more recently saw interesting science discussions, but they really have very high quality television broadcast quality film they sell. Maybe HD too.

    Wouldn't it make more sense, in terms of saving money and making it more accessible, to just host a torrent? Certainly this DG feed is a hose into TV stations where they can patch in some shots if they want some filler, but to degrade NASA into that kind of video press release is just so bizarre! If anyone knows how to get this high quality video I'd like to see it. NASA needs to get with the times.

    Note to TV reporters: Broadcast quality video file (animation, images and sound bites) to accompany this story are available through the Pathfire distribution service.
  20. This sounds good, but... by crhylove · · Score: 2, Funny

    It also sounds like the Galaxy is trying to defragment. I hope it doesn't corrupt our area. Though then we might finally have a space program worth a fuck. Never mind, sounds great!

    rhY

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  21. What Causes "Solar Turbulance"? by LifesABeach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While looking at the image of this "Wondering Star", I started to think, "Why such a predictable pattern?" It makes sense that the matter is being left behind because the star is hitting something, (dark matter?), and the resulting reaction is the leaving behind of atoms that will eventually be pulled by relatively nearby stars. What is most interesting, is that this trail is not in the visible, but in the UV bandwidth. In the UV band width, are we looking at the speed of atoms being "drained" off? Could it be that the Star is traveling "Up Stream?", or is it in the way of a "Dark Matter" current?

  22. How do we know this? by justthinkit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mira's velocity is 63.8km/s -- which is actually slower than our own's sun (which has no "tail")

    Given that with Hubble we can only see "3 or 4 pixels" worth of Pluto (according to the last episode of Universe on the History channel), how do we know what debris we may or may not be leaving behind our solar system as we move through space?

    --
    I come here for the love
  23. This seems really wrong... by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Insightful
    TFA did speak:

    Mira is traveling faster than a speeding bullet, and has a tail that's 13 light-years long and over 30,000 years old.

    Hrrrmmm. OK. So, a light year is about 5,879,000,000,000 miles.

    So, 13 light years would be 76,427,000,000,000 miles.

    Now divide that by 30,000 years and we get 2,547,566,666.667 miles. now there are 8,760 hours in a year, so if we divide 2,547,566,666.667 by 8,760, we get 290,818.113 miles per hour. Now, that IS fast, especially given the average asteroid skips along at 40,000 mph. But it's not THAT fast - it would take that star an hour to go from here to the moon. If it did it in 5 minutes - yeah, that's fast. But an hour? Heck - our feeble crappy spacecraft get there in a few days...

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  24. The story on Nature.com by tgeller · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wrote the news article for Nature. Here it is. It'll be free for only a few days, so grab it while it's hot!

    --
    Tom Geller
  25. Re:The NASA folks must have been watching bad film by DarenN · · Score: 2

    It was explained in one of the books that the planet Kessel (illegal spice production, etc.) was near a group of black holes called the Maw that limited the run to/from the planet to a very few extremely hazardous lanes. The Millenium Falcon was able to make the run in that distance (start of run to end of run) in a short distance because it was fast enough to cut the wash from the black holes.

    Mind you, Star Wars is so full of revisionism that all the stuff you "know" has been changed a million times. Like the mitichlorian and the force - this was revised with the explanation that "the don't CAUSE the force, they feed on force strength so the more of them there are, the stronger in the force that individual is" or the great "sith use red lightsabers" revision - wouldn't it suck at Jedi Academy - "What colour's your lightsaber" (building one was one of the tests) "Green", "Blue", "Purple", "Red - awww crap" and then everyone else turns to the unfortunate one and switches on their lightsaber.

    Er... :)

    --
    Rational thought is the only true freedom