Slashdot Mirror


A Talk With Opera CEO

With several new areas of expansion for Opera The Register took a few minutes to talk to Opera CEO Jon von Tetzchner. The interview addresses several of the most recent news items on the Opera front including, the adoption to Nintendo's Wii console, several advocates switching to Firefox, and others. "We just try to focus on our side. We've always focused on a somewhat richer interface. We've had a lot of negative comments ourselves over the years; for example, when we introduced tabbed browsing a lot of people said it doesn't make sense. We've introduced things like zooming, mouse gestures and the like - and we find they find their way into other browsers; tabs found their way into IE7. We are being copied, but we would like to focus on features and giving users a good experience."

7 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. Link to Page 1 of article by AskChopper · · Score: 5, Informative

    The above URL links to page 3 of the article. Here's the fist page http://www.theregister.com/2007/08/18/opera_ceo_in terview/

    --
    The old believe everything, the middle-aged suspect everything, the young know everything. - Oscar Wilde
  2. Re:Firefox tabs by ggvaidya · · Score: 5, Informative

    If he doesn't like the deal he's getting these days, perhaps he should start patenting stuff or quit the software business [...]
    ... which is right about the point where I stop using their browsers, I guess. I love Opera, and one of my major reasons for doing so is that it's a well-engineered product made by a company which has always been pretty good "corporate citizens". Yes, they have strange ideas about design and advertising, but they make good products, run a sustainable business, give me a very decent browser for free, support said browser at no extra cost, and are very good at coming up with interesting new features, which have a much better record than most other software I use as being completely "fleshed out". They're also "good geeks": they don't go nuts patenting things, are pretty okay with other companies reusing and building on their ideas, allow you to download early tech previews of their software for testing and feedback, and have their browser primed for the kind of people who like having a couple of dozen tabs open at any one time - i.e. the sort who are much too fond of Wikipedia for their own good. Also, that bit you quote doesn't sound (in context) like sour grapes: Jon is pointing out that one of Opera's biggest strengths is coming up with innovative features, including mouse gestures and tabs (innovative half a decade ago). Opera 9 has several new features such as Speed Dial and Thumbnail Preview, which made things easier for me within hours of installing, so I'd say they're still doing a great job on that front.

    Speaking of which, I checked Wikipedia on the mouse gestures bit; Konqueror's doesn't say when it got mouse gestures, but the mouse gestures page says Opera has had them "since version 5.11 (April 2001)", when KDE was at version 2.1. So if you can figure out when Konqueror got mouse gestures, you'll have your answer. Anecdotally, I found what might be the original patch for Opera mouse gestures in Konqueror, which would support Jon's idea of Opera as the originator.

    Cheers!
  3. Re:Are they really making money off Opera? by bigbigbison · · Score: 5, Informative

    They have multiple income streams. As noted in the interview, Opera, like Firefox, makes money from google and other search engines.

    And, as the browser for the Wii and the DS, I'm sure that Nintendo is giving them a nice amount of money.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  4. Re:Speed by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've heard opera's javascript interpreter was supposed to be fast. So, I just did a quick, totally non scientific (only one run, other minor activity in the background, etc) of a the slickspeed selector test, which tests various javascript libraries for their speed/accuracy. This was performed on Windows XP:

    Opera (9.20/ build 8771)
    246 : 3409 : 244 : 413 : 2518 : 329
    Safari (3.0.3 / build 522.15.5)
    322 : 1966 : 347 : 360 : 2488 : 519
    Firefox (2.0.0.6) -- two times, second was with firebug enabled
    397 : 10833 : 409 : 2569 : 14535 : 1100
    423 : 14059 : 429 : 5188 : 14426 : 3352
    ie (6.029)
    4695 : 8536 : 3393 : 2379 : 17856 : 1890

    Smaller numbers are faster, so opera is faster (in this test) than firefox. The toolkits, btw, are prototype, iQuery, mootools, ext, cssQuery, and dojoQuery).

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  5. Re:The only thing stopping me from using Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  6. Re:Translation: Theenking ooootseede-a zee Oopera by reanjr · · Score: 5, Informative

    You are probably not aware that after MS changed one of their sites to specifically break Opera, Opera released a "version" that turned that site into Swedish Chef talk. The GP was making reference to that. Probably could have made his point with only a few paragraphs, but it is humorous to those with the requisite background knowledge to understand the joke.

  7. Re:Firefox tabs by jlarocco · · Score: 5, Informative

    I mean who the hell was actually willing to use an operating system with adware built into it (or spend 30 dollars)? Not trying to troll, just stating that Opera started off with a terrible strategy, and they are paying for it now in the desktop market.

    I don't know if you've noticed, but Opera isn't going for a massive userbase on PCs. Unlike Firefox, they actually have to pay their developers. And unlike Internet Explorer, they don't have a huge operating system and office suite monopoly to subsidize browser development. Opera making a huge push for PC market share wouldn't make sense, and they'd go out of business.

    Their cash cow is mobile and embedded browsers, and that's what they focus on. Fortunately for those of us who use the PC version of Opera, their code is portable enough to run on desktops also.

    Making their desktop browser available for free probably had more to do with publicizing the Opera name than it did with competing with Firefox and IE.