Slashdot Mirror


First Successful Genome Transplant In Bacteria

eldavojohn writes "Researchers reported the first genome transplant from one bacterium to another, thereby transforming the species from M. mycoides to M. capricolum. The research, published in Science, shows that it is possible to achieve a success rate of 1 in 150,000 genome transplants in bacteria. While this may not seem like very good odds, it's actually a major step towards synthetic life, opening up the possibility of tailoring bacteria to our needs. The article mentions medical uses and fuel production as possible applications."

5 of 80 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Strong containment by Valar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, except that wide spectrum antibiotics target whole categories of bacteria. What really matters is the type of cell wall, because that is usually what antibiotics disrupt. As long as the resulting bacteria has a cell wall like the ones in other bacteria (and I see no reason why they wouldn't be designed that way), then we will have no problems, especially if it is a gram positive bacteria.

  2. Re:Strong containment by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Informative

    The bugs have been successfully designing themselves that way thanks to our good friend evolution.

    If someone wants to create an antibiotic-resistant superbug, it would be much easier for them to start with existing antibiotic-resistant bugs and tweak them with existing well-established techniques.

    The big news of this article is not that genetic material was transplanted, but that the *full and complete* genome was transplanted. To be honest, while it's an impressive feat, for 99% of the applications mentioned in the article summary, existing "partial genome" transplantation techniques are more than sufficient. People have been doing partial genome transplants with success for nearly three decades now - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insulin#Timeline_of_i nsulin_research .

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  3. Article is useless by the_kanzure · · Score: 3, Informative
    Most informative part:

    The researchers explained that the transplantation method is simple in concept, though complicated to execute. First, the proteins were stripped from the M. mycoides LC cells, resulting in naked DNA that can be passed between cells. Then this intact DNA was incubated briefly with M. capricolum cells, soaking in a solution that caused the M. capricolum cells to fuse together. As two of these recipient cells fused, they sometimes encapsulated a donor DNA chromosome.
    And then the citation:

    Lartigue, Carole, Glass, John I., Alperovich, Nina, Pieper, Rembert, Parmar, Prashanth P., Hutchison III, Clyde A., Smith, Hamilton O., and Venter, J. Craig. Genome Transplantation in Bacteria: Changing One Species to Another. 3 August 2007, Vo. 317, Science.
    Abstract:

    Originally published in Science Express on 28 June 2007
    Science 3 August 2007:
    Vol. 317. no. 5838, pp. 632 - 638
    DOI: 10.1126/science.1144622

    Genome Transplantation in Bacteria: Changing One Species to Another
    Carole Lartigue, John I. Glass,* Nina Alperovich, Rembert Pieper, Prashanth P. Parmar, Clyde A. Hutchison, III, Hamilton O. Smith, J. Craig Venter

    As a step toward propagation of synthetic genomes, we completely replaced the genome of a bacterial cell with one from another species by transplanting a whole genome as naked DNA. Intact genomic DNA from Mycoplasma mycoides large colony (LC), virtually free of protein, was transplanted into Mycoplasma capricolum cells by polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation. Cells selected for tetracycline resistance, carried by the M. mycoides LC chromosome, contain the complete donor genome and are free of detectable recipient genomic sequences. These cells that result from genome transplantation are phenotypically identical to the M. mycoides LC donor strain as judged by several criteria.

    The J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.

    * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jglass@jcvi.org
    But would it be too painful to actually add in relevant information from the published article? Not all of us know where to go get "Science", nor do we have magical access. Slashdot editors, if you would be so kind- stop accepting articles about papers behind paywalls. Some of us want to actually discuss the contents of these articles, the research methods, to look into what's actually going on ... not this hype that tells us nothing and wastes our time. ("You must be new!")

    Anyway, genome transplantation means that maybe we can get the genome of our stem cells transplanted into bacteria. Just store lots of stem cell DNA, and then one day start the procedure to make the bacteria uptake the DNA and--- well, the current problem with this is that the human genome is much different from bacterial genomes, and so there will undoubtedly be way too many problems with the host bacteria, i.e. trying to make some of the proteins and biomolecules that actually causes self-destruction, but the concept/hope is still there.

    BTW, the group that this article is about has been taking up way too much of our collective attention:
    * Team claims synthetic life feat
    * Venter Institute claims patent on synthetic life
    * and now this.
    And I should probably link over to this site.
  4. Re:A step forward, but questions remain by rritterson · · Score: 2, Informative

    That is, again, speculation on the part of the authors. In the paper, the authors only say they believe the cells are fusing because eukaryotic cells also fuse in the same medium, with again no evidence to support the claim. So, we don't even know for sure whether the bacteria are fusing, let alone whether the concentration they used is somehow optimal for fusion to take place.

    --
    -Ryan
    AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
  5. Full Science paper.... they did it right.. by tempest69 · · Score: 4, Informative
    http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/317/583 8/632

    The authors agreed that a single PCR wasnt enough, so they went with a hindIII digestion and an agarose gel run, to make sure that the pieces were all the right size, and nopt some funky recombination. They also managed a few southern blots to further ensure their results. AND they did 1300 Random Sequences (with luck a sequence can be read to 1000ish base pairs..), and IT ALL MATCHED.... 1.09 million base pairs all fit right...

    So my point is that they did the work, made sure it was bulletproof, got accepted into a major journal. And sure they dont know the whole story of whats going on, but it doesnt matter, they DID IT, a full Genome transplant, with proper methods used to ensure its validity..

    Storm