Slashdot Mirror


ESRB Refuses To Detail Manhunt 2 Re-Rating Logic

Next Generation reports that the ESRB is flatly refusing Leland Yee's request to further outline their logic behind Manhunt 2's re-rating. Says organization president Patrica Vance, "It is simply not our place to reveal specific details about the content we have reviewed, particularly when it involves a product yet to be released. What can be said is that the changes that were made to the game, including the depictions themselves and the context in which those depictions were presented, were sufficient to warrant the assignment of an M (Mature 17+) rating by our raters."

10 of 60 comments (clear)

  1. What's the issue? by steveo777 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Seems cut and dry. The ESRB isn't a news source and probably has in its guidelines that it can't release any game info anyway. Come to think of it, HAS anyone ever leaked info at the ESRB? That would be news indeed.

    Next story.

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    1. Re:What's the issue? by Sinistar2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is also cut and dry is that the ESRB said that content that garnered the AO rating was changed or removed to bring it back into M territory. This is no different than films initially rated R cutting content in order to achieve a PG-13 and yet no politicians demand to see detailed change lists for every movie re-rating.

  2. Translated: by spocksbrain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "We do not want people to scrutinize the way we arbitrarily make willy-vanilly decisions on the way we rate video games."

    1. Re:Translated: by jythie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Better translation: We don't want to get our asses sued off for releasing other company's confidential information.

  3. Re:Oversight by CrashPoint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't see any problem at all with requiring that the ESRB give details about what it objects to in games to those that request it. Likewise a think the MPAA should also be required to specify how and why it rates movies a particular way.
    I see a problem with it. They're private organizations, and their ratings are by nature a matter of opinion. There's no reason anyone should be legally required to justify an opinion. That's a road we don't need to go down.
  4. It probably is a smart thing to do by joeflies · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It probably is because that anytime there is a line drawn in the sand with something as arbitrary as a social standard, then you end up having to explain away yourself why some things fall above and below the line.

    What happens if they say that "the game was rated AO because of graphic decapitation", and then the lawyers end up twisting that rule so that they can press the ESRB how come Baraka's fatality isn't an AO

    It's a way that they can do ratings with an "I know it if I see it" type methodology without having to be held accountable why some things are AO and some are mature. They're an industry board, not a government agency, so I'm fine with that. I have no problems with the way the games are being rated now, and I'm ok with manhunt being sold as mature too.

  5. Why is this surprising? by Minwee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Games are submitted to the ESRB with the understanding of confidentiality. All that the ESRB releases is a final rating, they don't leak the whole content of the game.

    Doing anything different would be like the MPAA releasing movie ratings of "This film is rated PG for sci-fi action violence, with some mature content like that scene near the end where Darth Vader reveals that he is Luke's father" or "Rated PG-13 for intense thematic material, violent images and Malcolm Crowe really being dead all along but not realizing it".

    If Dr. Linn or Senator Yee want to know what changes have been made to Manhunt 2 then they should be asking Rockstar about it. You know, the people who wrote it, made changes to it, and are in a position to release that kind of information. Hounding the ESRB for details is like calling someone's family doctor to demand details about their health.

  6. Doesn't matter. by Duffy13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, even if the ESRB released their process information and it indicated that nothing was in fact changed, it would not really matter one bit legally. They are a voluntary organization, their is no legal enforcement behind their decisions. They can do whatever the hell they want. Would it possibly damage their image and put the whole self-rating system into a new light? Probably. Would it be good or bad in the long run? Tough call.

    --
    "Now you know, and knowing is half the battle!"
  7. I love it how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the ESRB wouldn't tell us exactly why Manhunt 2 was rated AO when infinitely more violent films aren't the anti-video game croud were all for it, but when they wont release why it's been re-rated to M it's suddenly a bad thing to them that the ESRB doesn't dish out that kind of info.

    The double standards of the anti-gaming muppets just go to show how utterly idiotic they actually are.

  8. The ESRB should stand strong. by Devir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the ESRB is a body of people organized to self govern the Game industry. Their ratings are pretty damn clear to people with basic english reading skills"

    "M 17+, Realistic Violence, blood, sexual content"
    "13+, cartoon violence"

    Blah blah.

    Games are the 2000AD version of the Witch hunts that went on in the 1400 to 1600's. It's a distraction against real political issues that no one really seems to care about, like:
    "The war on terror, we gonna catch and kill Osama or not?"
    "Budget over runs and useless pet projects, like $10 million slipped into the war budget for research why breasts are getting bigger"
    "reviewing our current and past laws to see which ones are outdated and should be repealed and rewritten instead of just writing MORE laws to enforce and obfuscate."

    These days people care is a 62 year old senator is having sex in rest rooms, how people choose to waste their time and how long some famous hottie is jailed for.

    With the ESRB holding their ground and telling these senators to get jacked, we're sending a message that we're done with being pushed around. Now we need to get the government to focus on important topics like Highway speed laws (raise the limits), Fair use copyright, catering to the consumer instead of big business, win the war on terror, stop wasting money on stupid projects and government funding and lower taxes, and review and rewrite foreign polic.

    There are tons of things far more important than sex in M rated video games and graphic violence. THere is serious real world violence that needs to be quelled, jobless and homelss, corporations running amok setting repressive laws, making us buy the same item 4 times to use it in a slightly different way and so on. We need better education and understanding, not just kicking the "trouble" child out of class and watching their grades go down. We need to raise the bar on education, not lower it because more kids are failing. I know it's easier to lower standards than to fix the problem, but this is the future of our world here. Any one who watched the movie "Idiocracy" can see that is our future.

    In such a "Free" country, I'm not feeling the love here. I'm not feeling the freedom to drive my car down an empty highway at 90. I'm not feeling the freedom of making a mix CD for the lady I am courting, without the fear of defending myself in court. As kids we used to share the newest computer game and install them on the school computers. Others would love that game and go buy a copy for themselves...

    I feel myself straying off topic. But I'm passionate about our freedoms and how fast we're loosing them. It extends far beyond the ESRB and Manhunt, and Hot Coffee, and Bioshock. It stretches into how soft we've really become and how the innovative spirit the country was founded on is now lost in Patent lawsuits and mega corporate infighting.