Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Military Hacked Into Pentagon

iFrated informs us of a successful penetration of US Defense Department computers by the Chinese military last June. From the article: "The Pentagon acknowledged shutting down part of a computer system serving the office of Robert Gates, defense secretary, but declined to say who it believed was behind the attack. Current and former officials have told the Financial Times an internal investigation has revealed that the incursion came from the [Chinese] People's Liberation Army. One senior US official said the Pentagon had pinpointed the exact origins of the attack. Another person familiar with the event said there was a 'very high level of confidence... trending towards total certainty' that the PLA was responsible." The PLA is also accused of breaking into German government computers, including a network in the office of the Chancellor.

15 of 405 comments (clear)

  1. Carte Blanche by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is the US going to do?

    Nothing. Quite frankly China has tested the limits of both the US and UN for years, and neither the Clinton nor Bush administrations were willing or capable of doing anything. With problems in Iran, Syria, North Korea, oh and those two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the US does not have the capability to swat a fly elsewhere, let alone threaten the military might of China.

    China knows they can get away with such actions, so they will. If you don't believe me, look up recent actions regarding Taiwan, Tibet and East Timor, amongst other things. China also does nothing to combat the millions of dollars in lost US revenue from stolen IP, yet we give them favored trading partner status, making our trade deficit worse.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Carte Blanche by demachina · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Quite frankly China has tested the limits of both the US and UN for years, and neither the Clinton nor Bush administrations were willing or capable of doing anything."

      What exactly do you propose the U.S. do? The Chinese are holding such huge U.S dollar reserves they could ruin the U.S. economy just by dumping them, though they would probably cause a global economic collapse and suffer as much as everyone else if they did.

      The U.S. has transfered so much capital and IP to China, and we are so dependent on the steady stream of container shipping from China you pretty much have to look the other way at anything short of open warfare.

      Besides which China is a Republican businessman's fantasy come true. It has a vast pool of dirt cheap labor, no labor unions, almost no business regulation, no environmental controls, and workers either keep their mouths shut or they are harshly dealt with by the state. They have one party authoritarian rule and as long as that one party is pro business, which they have been for the last couple decades, they are a Republican's wet dream. Why do you think so many big western corporations are rushing to China lock, stock and barrel. Liberal democracies sucks for business, you have to pay people more than a subsistence wage, you can't kill 4000 a year in coal mines like you can in China, you can't lock workers up if they bitch....

      The new Fascist China is pure heaven for Republicans, so their is almost nothing China is going to do they are going to have a problem with including this. Most western businessman and politicians are way more fixated on kissing Chinese ass these days than they are starting some kind of confrontation with them.

      Besides which when it comes to network security if you are stupid enough to put anything important on the Internet, and you can't keep it secure you kind of deserve what you get, doesn't really matter where the attack comes from.

      --
      @de_machina
  2. questions, assumptions by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Questions:
    * were they secured computers? You know, the ones networked via fiber in concrete-filled conduits so that the physical layer can't be compromised?
    * is this even a new thing?

    Assumptions:
    Is everyone so sure that the US hasn't ALREADY hacked the Chinese computers?

    Before everyone gets their panties in an uproar, some context would be nice.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  3. It cuts both ways by Nazlfrag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, America has tested Chinas resolve for years by sending hackers into its systems, yet China isn't willing or capable to do anything. With hundreds of American military bases around the world and a mass of troops in Japan, Taiwan and the rest of the Pacific, they do not have the capability to move an inch outside their borders, let alone threaten the military might of America.

    1. Re:It cuts both ways by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've seen first-hand some of the incredible technology and training we had in the military, but neither China nor the US really wants a piece of each other. That is a conflict that only ends badly pretty much for everyone.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  4. Re:Wire up the IDS by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, if you dont see any difference, I expect to see you in the enlistment line first thing tomorrow morning. And dont make up some BS that youve 'already served' because it will be a lie. NO SINGLE PERSON who has been in war, will make the suggestion to simply to go to war over a PC break-in.

    And if you STILL dont see any difference, try the following links; http://theheretik.typepad.com/the_heretik/images/c hild_of_war_life_in_death_053005.jpg http://www.videos1.informationclearinghouse.info/i mages/seven.jpg

    Those that modded this 'insightful' I would expect will be in the front of that enlistment line tomorrow, right ahead of you.

  5. Re:Sanctions by vandan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We could secure both Afghanistan or Iraq.

    That's SO far from the truth that I don't know whether you're lying or incredibly deceived. The US army is at breaking point, and the situation is spiraling out of control in both occupations.

    The problem is, that to do it effectivly, we don't get the governments we want put in place. We end up with more of the same to no end.

    There's no such thing as a democracy under military occupation. The UN even says so.

    In the later case, it would be very likely that other countries would come to their aid if more then a minority of citizens wanted the democracy back.

    That statement carries the absurd assumption that some people don't want democracy. EVERYONE wants democracy, apart from the small group of people who currently have control, of course. But the majority of the population will ALWAYS support democracy AND self-determination.

    If we chucked all that out the window and just went for securing the countries, it would be done by now.

    You're obviously under the false impression that our aim there is to create a beautiful, blossoming democracy! It's not. It's to grab resources and set up military bases. Democracy is a word that the ruling class throw around. It's meaning in this context is, "A group of individuals of considerable power who will do our bidding". And they can't even get THAT right. But the main goal is to secure Afghanistan and Iraq, and is slipping further away from us each day.
  6. US Military could benefit by heretic108 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Plant a few honeypot boxen around the Pentagon network, and load them up with tasty disinformation, aiming for outcomes like:
    • Making an advanced US capability seem flaky or ineffective
    • Making a flaky or undeveloped US capability seem advanced and devastating
    • Sending the Chinese into fruitless directions in R&D, costing them billions
    • Trick the Cninese into types of action that could yield up some useful intel for the US
    The opportunities are endless.
    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
  7. It doesn't make any sence... by B5_geek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lets make a couple of assumptions..

    (1) That the Pentagon doesn't have a Windows box connected to the Internet with a public IP address.
    (2) That the 'hackers' are smart-enough to actually hack into the Pentagon (ergo they are not script-kiddies).

    Wouldn't these hackers be smart enough to originate these attacks from some-other hacked network via an anonymous proxy? (And then delete any logs that still might point to their activities.)

    At the very least I would expect a simple IP spoofing to have taken place.

    This was too easy, something is up.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:It doesn't make any sence... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Lets make a couple of assumptions..

      (1) That the Pentagon doesn't have a Windows box connected to the Internet with a public IP address.
      Why would you make such an almost certainly erroneous assumption? The U.S. Military uses Micro$hit, as do most (all?) fortune 500 companies. There are an astounding number of incompetant "sysadmins" who think that an M$ certification is an indication that they are computer gurus. There is a reason why there is a joke about Military Intelligence being an oxymoron.

      Are there some super-smart people in the military? Of course. Are there incompetant ones in positions of power as well? I don't know. Let's ask the Commander in Chief ... Oh wait ... I do know ;-)
      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  8. Re:Ummm... by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm agreeing with most of what you say, but why would anybody be surprised that China is using its hackers to bust in to foreign networks. Everyone, I'm confident does it, including the US trying to break into Chinese state networks.

    Espionage is one of the oldest tools of civilization. Heck, even allies spy on each other. Wouldn't surprise me at all if the Brits were doing the same things to the US.

    Espionage, in fact, can be a very good thing for peace. The Soviets and the Americans knew so much about each others' military capacity and arsenals that neither side dreamed of an open, direct conflict. A lack of knowledge of the opposing side's capacity would have been infinitely more dangerous.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  9. Re:Does anybody actually believe by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is another set up situation

          I agree. Yet another anti-china story, in a long list of anti-china stories over the past few weeks, ever since the chinese threatened to call in the US debt when the US demanded the chinese revaluate the Yuan. More American propaganda being fed to the people, to make sure that China is slowly moved to the "axis of evil" category.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  10. Re:Highly Armed Nincompoops by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is anyone else nervous that these clowns are armed to the teeth, with enough firepower to destroy the world and make the rubble bounce several times?

          Yes. America makes me very nervous. Oh, isn't that what you meant?

          China has around 200 nuclear weapons, compared to the US's 5000+.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  11. Re:Sanctions by fluffy99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exactly. China doesn't want war, but they want desperately to close the military and technology gap. Stealing the technology instead of developing it themselves is vastly cheaper, quicker and easier. The are not the only country friendly or not who engages in corporate and military espionage against the US. ANd don't think the US isn't spying on the other countries either.

  12. Re:Sanctions by coaxial · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That statement carries the absurd assumption that some people don't want democracy. EVERYONE wants democracy, apart from the small group of people who currently have control, of course. But the majority of the population will ALWAYS support democracy AND self-determination. World history is full of dictatorships that rose to power with popular support. And I'm not even talking about bait-and-switch dictatorships (ala communism). To say a majority always wants democracy is absurd. People always want security. They always want a food and shelter. They always want "respect," whatever that means to them. That democracy isn't on the list.