Slashdot Mirror


ISO Says No To Microsoft's OOXML Standard

qcomp writes "The votes are in and Microsoft has lost for now, reports the FFII's campaign website OOXML. The 2/3 majority needed to proceed with the fast-track standardization has not been achieved. Now the standard will head to the ballot resolution meeting to address the hundreds of technical comments submitted along with the votes." Here is yesterday's speculation as to how the vote would turn out.

11 of 315 comments (clear)

  1. It ain't over yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It ain't over 'till the fat man throws a chair...

    1. Re:It ain't over yet... by jkrise · · Score: 4, Funny

      It ain't over 'till the fat man throws a chair...

      Interesting you should say that:
      http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/articl e.php?story=20070718060228231

      OOXML is not to everyone's liking, with Sun Microsystems being denied a seat, and Microsoft holding the chair (President) ...

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  2. The Delivery by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 5, Funny

    Faux standard was not certified.
    [A]bort, [R]etry, [F]ail?

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    1. Re:The Delivery by jkrise · · Score: 4, Funny

      Faux standard was not certified.
      [A]bort, [R]etry, [F]ail?


      That is the DOS error message.. these are Vista days.

      It appears Microsoft is polluting the ISO and offering gold to their 'Gold' partners...

      Cancel / Allow ?

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    2. Re:The Delivery by Xiaran · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hi! I see you are trying to ram a ill conceived standard through ISO. Would you like me to

      1. Bribe a bunch of guys to vote yes for you?

      2. Provide a specification thats so incomprehensible the only Word will be able to fully implement it?

      3. Make dubious FUD statements about OpenDocument?

    3. Re:The Delivery by ozbird · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cancel / Allow ?

      Don't you mean "Yes / Yes, with comments"?

  3. Dr. Claw.... by petercruickshank · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll get you next time, Gadget! Next time!

  4. MSFT promotes choice among certifying bodies by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a recent development MSFT spokesman said that, one standard specifying body meets all is not a viable workable solution for the whole world. Mr Tong'n Cheek said that Microsoft will promote an alternative standard specifying body Open ISO. He said that Microsoft wants its customers to have a choice in international bodies creating standards, choice in standards themselves too. This way users can have various choices like, OpenISO certified OOXML saving MSFT product, or ISO certified OOXML saving MSFT product or, uncertified OOXML saving MSFT product or unsupported ODF saving MSFT product or...

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  5. Re:But now... by bidule · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Microsoft doesn't have the air of legitimacy that ISO approval would have bought
    Here, fixed it for you!
    --
    ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
  6. You forgot by ipb · · Score: 5, Funny

    4. All of the above

  7. Re:Wait by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 3, Funny

    [A]bstain, [R]evoke, [F]lail
    --

    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.