Are Relational Databases Obsolete?
jpkunst sends us to Computerworld for a look at Michael Stonebraker's opinion that RDBMSs "should be considered legacy technology." Computerworld adds some background and analysis to Stonebraker's comments, which appear in a new blog, The Database Column. Stonebraker co-created the Ingres and Postgres technology while a researcher at UC Berkeley in the early 1970s. He predicts that "column stores will take over the [data] warehouse market over time, completely displacing row stores."
The name of his blog is The Database Column after all.
"I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey
>"column stores will take over the [data] warehouse market over time, completely displacing row stores."
Hmmmm. So if I rotate my Paradox or Excel table by 90 degrees, I have achieved database coolness? Who knew it was so easy.
Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
Well I just turned my server on its side and now all my tables are storing in columns. I love new technology.
No. There, that was easy !
It's like the packet of crisps that says "Is there a 20 pound note in here !!?" - the answer should always be 'No'.
Except maybe for one person.
sed -e 's/crisps/potato chips/' -e 's/pound/dollar/'
The next big thing in DBMS:
turning your head sideways.
You can't talk about Wikipedia's flaws on Wikipedia
Along with Procedural Programming, this could REVOLUTIONIZE the software industry!!
I've got it!
;)
Cell-based storage!!! Best of both worlds!!! Mix of both Row and Column based storage, how can we go wrong!
Just think about it, what could be better than one file for each column in each row?
And they said I couldn't have my cake and eat it too, sheesh
No Comment.
I went back and read the original article....
Oh, the horror! That's a heinous crime on Slashdot! Not even the editors do that!!!
If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....