Slashdot Mirror


Radiation Absorbing Mineral Found In the Arctic

An anonymous reader writes "A mineral has recently been found that exhibits the astounding property of being able to remove radiation from water-based solutions. 'After coming into contact with the mineral, radioactive water becomes completely safe. Had this mineral been available to physicists after the Chernobyl or Three Mile Island disasters, the consequences might have been very different, as both accidents resulted in contamination from radioactive water.' Also, the article notes that although only grams of the material have been found, tons of it are needed; they are confident they could artificially reproduce it."

29 of 351 comments (clear)

  1. correct me if I'm wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Had this mineral been available to physicists after the Chernobyl or Three Mile Island disasters, the consequences might have been very different,


    I thought radiation levels around 3 Mile Island never got more than twice background? Aernt there are plenty of normal places around the word (i.e. not uranium mines/dumps) where the levels are naturally higher?
    1. Re:correct me if I'm wrong by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes but showing the DANGER of nuclear energy through sensational media coverage is mandatory!

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
    2. Re:correct me if I'm wrong by BlueParrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are plenty of places where water is naturally full of alligators, it doesn't mean it's okay or desirable to introduce crocs in places where there aren't any.

      Is that another bad analogy I see? Oh yes... Ok, lets put it into perspective then. Based on the radiation dose people were exposed to from three mile island it was estimated that you could expect 0.5 cases of cancer as a result. I.e, there was a 50% chance that one person might develop cancer due to the radiation at some part during his/her life. Now, start comparing it to risks we accept every day. The risk of getting cancer from the Sun's UV rays. The risk of getting killed when you cross the road. The risk from fossil fuel emissions. The risk of drowning in a hydroelectric dam. The risk you will choke on a peanut... etc. Basically, if you don't think the risk from accidents like TMI is acceptable, you'd better not eat any solid food tonight, because there is a chance you will choke on it. Oh, and I wouldn't ever take a shower if I were you, you might slip and hit your head against the tub.
    3. Re:correct me if I'm wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      This would have changed the situation at TMI significantly. Instead of 0 deaths due to radiation, you would have only a thousandth the deaths, maybe even only a millionth. Let me grab my calculator...resulting in 0 deaths.

    4. Re:correct me if I'm wrong by p0tat03 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, and I wouldn't ever take a shower if I were you,

      I'm on Slashdot, that advice is irrelevant.

    5. Re:correct me if I'm wrong by davester666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Quick, start mining the arctic for this material. And if you happen to come across oil, it's a bonus!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  2. Filtered water by Gogogoch · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, this sounds like a mineral based water filter. It removes the radioactive isotopes from water, not the radiation itself. So anything that can remove these typically heavy ions will work. I'm surprised this is new.

  3. Fooled again. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Once again a Slashdot editor is fooled by pseudo-science.

  4. Bullshit by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My bullshit detector is going off. Yours should be too.

    --
    No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:Bullshit by lahi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed. It's way out on the taurokoprometric scale. If only they could find a bullshit-absorbing mineral.

      -Lasse

    2. Re:Bullshit by JonTurner · · Score: 5, Funny

      >>If only they could find a bullshit-absorbing mineral.

      Slashdotium 404. A rare, low-energy isotope of unobtanium. A naturally occurring byproduct of cheetos, Jolt and bad upbringing, frequently found in mother's basements and video arcades it is of no known use.

    3. Re:Bullshit by arivanov · · Score: 4, Informative

      Probably. Actually it may be either bad science or bad journalism.

      AFAIK the annoyance no 1 contaminant in nuclear waste is radiactive Rutenium. Whatever you do it always ends up in both your "pure" fraction and your "waste" in significant quantities and has a spectrum of isotopes which while not very long lived, have a halftime long enough just to be a major annoyance. So if someone in the arctic has discovered something that absorbs it in quantity and tried to explain his discovery to a Russian journalist over one of those standard "beyond the arctic circle" cocktails known as "Vupej, poliarnikom budesh" the resulting article on the morning after would have been something like this.

      So it may be not the bullshit detector going off the scale. It may be the alcohol one when applied to an illiterate journalist.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    4. Re:Bullshit by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think Slashdotium 404 is an isotope of Virginium.

  5. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I followed the article. Seems to contain no substantial information whatever. Who writes this shit?
    Anyone know more about this story (assuming there is more to know)?

  6. Three Mile Island disaster? by Matt+Edd · · Score: 5, Informative
    Not to say that it wasn't a bad thing but calling it a disaster seems like FUD to me. From wikipedia...

    The scientific community is largely agreed on the effects of the Three Mile Island accident. The consensus is that no member of the public was injured by the accident. "The average radiation dose to people living within ten miles of the plant was eight millirem, and no more than 100 millirem to any single individual. Eight millirem is about equal to a chest X-ray, and 100 millirem is about a third of the average background level of radiation received by US residents in a year.
  7. 27-4 sounds like by click2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

    a russian convenience store.

    --
    I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
  8. What is the "Kolsky Research Institute"? by johndiii · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google returns only three hits for "Kolsky Research Institute" - all connected with this story.

    As nice as it would be to believe that this is true, it sounds like pseudoscience to me. Absorbing any radioactive substance from water just does not sound plausible, given that absorption would be a micro-level physical process, or a chemical one, acting on a nuclear-level phenomenon.

    --
    Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
  9. I know the mineral - it's LEAD! by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know the mineral - it's LEAD! Yes, just grind it up into a fine powder and sprinkle it into your radioactive brew: even the glowing-est cup of water will be safe to drink again.

  10. Learn every day; life is too complicated for games by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Informative

    "They've found a new mineral which absorbs radiation... It can absorb radioactivity from liquid nuclear waste."

    The article linked in the Slashdot story does not say that radioactive minerals are being absorbed, a chemical impossibility. It says radiation is absorbed, which is impossible in physics, in the way that that the article states.

    I know that this will probably be moderated down by those who use games to avoid dealing with reality. However, it seems useful to say that life is too complicated to play games; it is necessary to learn everything you can every day.

    Slashdot editors have, according to them, spent a lot of time playing games, and they are often fooled by junk pretending to be science. I'm guessing that there is a connection between their game playing and their ignorance of the real world.

  11. Please use common definitions by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Usually, calling something a "disaster" implies that someone or something was negatively effected. The Three Mile Island "disaster" resulted in no impact to anyone or anything aside from causing electricity bills to rise.

          Brett

  12. Re:The applications are obvious by mdmkolbe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The mineral absorbs "radioactive substances", not the radiation itself.

    While radiation poisoning can occur due to exposure to radiation and transmutation of the isotopes in the exposed substance, that particular effect is relatively minor.

    The larger concern is that in the process of running a neuclear power plant, tiny flakes of the radioactive power rod detach and mix with flakes from other parts in the machinery thus forming a radioative dust. Since dust is so easily transfered, if I touch the dust and then I touch a book and then you touch the book, you may get a small amount of this radioactive dust on you. I didn't really make the book radioactive as much as I put dust that was radioactive on it. (Radiation suits don't actaully protect from direct radiation, they just make sure you don't track radioactive dust through the rest of the station.)

    My guess is that this mineral is just filtering out heavy radioactive metals (i.e. taking the radioactive part of the dust out of the dust).

  13. Re:Space Travel by dstiggy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Exactly it's Trellium D! Man why didn't I think of that before... Now wait was that radiation or did it absorb spacial anomalies? Damn Star Trek!

  14. Exactly by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It removes the radioactive isotopes from water, not the radiation itself.

    Yeah, and what kind of radioactive material? Strontium and Cesium? Beta emitters? How about I-131? Or is it just heavy nucleotides? What about radioisotopes that happen to be toxic besides being radioactive?

    I'll be happy to run the dosimetry for anyone who wants to experiment but you won't catch me drinking any radiation snake oil the Russians cook up...that doesn't start with a vat of potato peelings anyway.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  15. Small Typo in Article by DieByWire · · Score: 5, Funny

    After coming into contact with the mineral, radioactive water becomes completely safe.

    It was supposed to say, 'Ten half-lives after coming into contact with the mineral, radioactive water becomes completely safe.'

    --
    Never shake hands with a man you meet in a fertility clinic.
  16. You insensitive clod! by Poingggg · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I wouldn't ever take a shower if I were you, you might slip and hit your head against the tub...

    I just died that way!

    --
    What person will donate an airborne act of love?
    1. Re:You insensitive clod! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just died that way! You know you're a geek when the first thing you do after dying is post on Slashdot to tell everyone about it.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  17. No way to selectively absorb radioactive minerals. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is no filter that selectively absorbs radioactive minerals, because radioactivity is a nuclear phenomenon, and filters are chemically active.

  18. Re:correct me if the story changed by epine · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The actual radiation release from TMI was not earth shattering, regardless of Spin at Eleven. However, they released a report following the accident which claimed the accident had a relatively modest risk profile. This "nothing to see here" Kemeny report was published well before the Idaho National Lab finished dismantling the reactor core. What they found at the bottom was shocking. Let's just say the radioactive blob was well on its way to China.

    http://americanhistory.si.edu/tmi/tmi03.htm

    7:45 a.m. By now there are at least 20, perhaps as many as 60, operators, supervisors, and other persons in the control room. Although none is yet ready to believe that the core had been uncovered, radiation levels in the power plant buildings are so high that Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations require the declaration of a general emergency. While state and federal officials are being informed of elevated radiation levels, unbeknown to all, a molten mass of metal and fuel--some twenty tons in all--is spilling into the bottom of the reactor vessel. The bottom of the reactor vessel is steel, five inches (13 cm) thick. But even that thickness of steel would not be expected to hold up for more than a few hours against such heat.

    Note that the information presented here comes *after* they discovered the true magnitude of the molten blob years later. It took INEEL a good while to chisel out twenty tons of highly radioactive material with a remote-controlled jackhammer.

    From the rather tame Kemeny report

    e. There is no indication that any core material made contact with the steel pressure vessel at a temperature above the melting point of steel (2,800F).

    Well, they later discovered that twenty tons of material well above that temperature was puddling in that vicinity at an alarming rate: perhaps no longer than episode in the series 24.

    The story of TMI is not what was actually released, but how clueless they all were for a long time afterward about how close it came to dumping a Chernobyl-unit of molten goo into the Pennsylvania water table.

    Concerning Chernobyl:

    All remaining dosimeters had limits of 0.001 R/s and therefore read "off scale". Thus, the reactor crew could ascertain only that the radiation levels were somewhere above 0.001 R/s (3.6 R/h), while the true levels were 5,600 times higher in some areas.

    Because of the fallacious low readings, the reactor crew chief Alexander Akimov assumed that the reactor was intact. The evidence of pieces of graphite and reactor fuel lying around the building was ignored, and the readings of another dosimeter brought in by 4:30 a.m. were dismissed under the assumption that the new dosimeter must have been defective. Akimov stayed with his crew in the reactor building until morning, trying to pump water into the reactor. None of them wore any protective gear. Most of them, including Akimov, died from radiation exposure within three weeks.

    I suspect he took one look at that reading and thought to himself, "if that reading is correct, my goose is cooked". The Soviet Union never established much of a track record in encouraging the self-preservation of men poured into the breech. Typically, your reward for survival was being shot.

    Back in America, the debate centers around 0.5 cancers in the aftermath, rather than the one or two hour window between what actually happened and the China syndrome. I wonder if they made an explicit political calculation: let's rush through publication of the Kemeny report before we learn anything more frightening we'd be obligated to disclose. Under the Bush administration, those obligations have mostly been terminated. They could probably write the accident report today for a future accident that hasn't even happened yet.

  19. Re:You're not wrong, you're an idiot! by Synchis · · Score: 4, Funny

    "(Score:0, Insightful)"...

    Only on Slashdot...

    --
    Thomas A. Knight
    Author of The Time Weaver