Slashdot Mirror


Method of Reading Discovered

Scientists have discovered that the method our eyes use to process letters on a page is different than previously believed. Instead of assimilating one letter at a time our eyes actually lock on to two different letters simultaneously about half the time. "The team's results demonstrated that both eyes lock on to the same letter 53% of the time; for 39% of the time they see different letters with uncrossed eyes; and for 8% of the time the eyes are crossing to focus on different letters. A follow-up experiment with the eye-tracking equipment showed that we only see one clear image when reading because our brain fuses the different images from our eyes together."

8 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Frsit Psot by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 5, Funny

    If yuo corss yuor eeys smoetemis, you sohlud be albe to raed tihs qitue eailsy. I terid it, and it mdae all the sepllnig msitaeks on salsdhot go aawy. Hvewoer, it ddi not ipormve Sttucle Mkoney's eitding.

  2. Patented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Since I've already patented a method to use our eyes use to process letters on a page, I'll be heading down to Texas to hash it out with the lawyers...

  3. Anchor Man Reference by ttapper04 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "lock on to two different letters simultaneously about half the time."


    ...half the time, every time.

  4. That explains it! by DeeVeeAnt · · Score: 4, Funny

    It seems that technical documentation is often optimised to take advantage of this phenomenon. For instance, recent tests on IBM's Tivoli Access Manager docs caused my eyes to cross 130% of the time.

    --
    Home fucking is killing prostitution.
  5. Re:RTFA by zeromorph · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll keep my eyes crossed for that.

    --
    "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
  6. Re:"Bnikaerg-dwon"pemenohs allacitamotuy, aletaruc by dzurn · · Score: 2, Funny
    Sorry, I mistyped a word:

    Atluds who rley olny on shgit-rgnidaeg teuqinhces rleray gnia mcuh foitcnun
    should be

    Atluds who rley olny on shgit-rgnidaeg teuqinhces rleray gian mcuh foitcnun

    In my defense, I must say it was really hard to proofread.

  7. Re:"Bnikaerg-dwon"pemenohs allacitamotuy, aletaruc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Thanks. Now I know why I was having trouble reading it.

  8. Re: Dotters reading articles by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dotters read an article only 53 % of the time.

    39% of the time they begin posting comments without reading the article at all.

    8% of the time they read the wrong article entirely and post anyway.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine