Slashdot Mirror


Inventor of GMR Bids To Shake Up Storage, Again

Nrbelex writes "Stuart S. P. Parkin, an I.B.M. research fellow largely unknown outside a small fraternity of physicists, thinks he is poised to bring about a breakthrough that could increase the amount of data stored on a chip or a hard drive by a factor of a hundred. This is the man who pioneered exploiting the giant magnetoresistance effect in the 90s, causing disk storage to jump ahead of the Moore's Law curve. If he proves successful in developing 'racetrack memory,' he will create a universal computer memory, one that can potentially replace DRAM and flash memory chips, and make a 'disk drive on a chip' possible. It could begin to replace flash memory in three to five years, scientists say."

22 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Enough space for all the porn in the internet... at least for now.

    1. Re:Finally... by XenoPhage · · Score: 5, Funny

      Enough space for all the porn in the internet... at least for now. I disagree.. I don't think the Internet has enough space for porn, it seems to keep spilling over into my browser...
      --
      XenoPhage
      Technological Musings
  2. Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 years? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What? All of you? You're all using this man's technology right now. Accusations of this product being vaporware do not account for the man's track record (no pun intended). You should all give this man a little credit, okay?

  3. Awesome! by illegibledotorg · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it means my computer gets to look like that thing from TFA, then I'm SO in!

    1. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I also like that they managed to get a picture of a chick in there as well!

  4. Three to five years is OK... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    to make a working lab prototype with limited functionality. It will take a lot longer to drive out cost and increase reliability sufficiently for this to be used in mass consumer applications.

    Update of electronic devices typically takes quite a while. NAND flash was invented in the 1980s yet only really caught on in approx 2002.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  5. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No. All peoples claims should be approached with a skeptic eye. What I will do is not discard this man as a crackpot immediately. Many men that have created great things also had crackpot ideas.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  6. Library conversion by Per+Wigren · · Score: 5, Funny

    allow every consumer to carry data equivalent to a college library on small portable devices Now, I'm confused. How many College Libraries are there in a Library of Congress?
    --
    My other account has a 3-digit UID.
  7. Whats the point... by damburger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If every 4mb of music you buy have costs $2, then your 16 Terrabyte Ipod would cost $4 million to fill up.

    Extra capacity is useless if the cost of data is artificially inflated

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:Whats the point... by merreborn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bah, you can get 30 GB of blu-ray/HD-DVD for $15. It'd only cost $8,200 to fill a 16 TB iPod with full-quality movies at that price.

      As storage grows, so does the bit rate and fidelity of file formats, and the way we use storage itself. I don't know about you, but back in 1994, I had maybe 20 meg of low-bitrate WAV files on my 250 megabyte harddrive. 10 years later, I had 20 gigabytes of MP3 files on my 250 gigabyte harddrive. In another 10 years, I fully expect to have 20 terrabytes of audio/video on my 250 terrabyte drive.

  8. Five Years. It's always Five Years. by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny

    begin to replace flash memory in three to five years

    Five years! It's always Five Years!

    By 2012 I expect to have, this super memory technology, solar cells with efficiency above 70% for pennies per watt, flying cars, paper thin televisions the size of my wall, fuel cell powered hybrid cars, batteries replaced by power cells that store more power, cost less, are infinitely rechargeable, and charge/discharge like capacitors -- plus several other things from the last few months of Slashdot.

    Also the Mayan calendar will have expired, and the entire West Coast in to the Sierra Nevada mountains will be flooded, so I don't know how useful this all will be to me.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  9. Storage leaps by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Imagine the social implications of the $50 5TB thumb drive...

    "I was over at Jimmy's house yesterday and asked him to put some good stuff on my thumb drive. He gave me HD copies of the top 80 movies released in the past two years, plus 2000 of his favorite albums.

    Meanwhile, a second thumb drive I keep clipped to my belt has been keeping an audio/video recording of the last 17 months of my life, nonstop."

  10. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    All peoples claims should be approached with a skeptic eye.

    Yeah, right.

  11. "Inventor" of GMR a little misleading by Badge+17 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Read what the article actually says - "Mr. Parkin puttered for two years in a lab in the early 1990s, trying to find a way to commercialize an odd magnetic effect of quantum mechanics he had observed at supercold temperatures." Though he may have been absolutely critical to making GMR hard drives (I don't know the history) credit for discovery of GMR goes to Peter Grunberg and Albert Fert. You might be able to call Parkin the inventor of GMR hard drives, though.

  12. Now here comes the MPAA and RIAA by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now comes the MPAA and RIAA asking for damages and injunctive relief.

    This speed and storage capacity and can only be used for downloading and pirating illegal copies of movies and music.

    Therefore this must not be permitted to happen.

  13. At Long Last! by BlackGriffen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They have finally perfected the abacus!

    FTFA:
    "His idea is to stand billions of ultrafine wire loops around the edge of a silicon chip -- hence the name racetrack -- and use electric current to slide infinitesimally small magnets up and down along each of the wires to be read and written as digital ones and zeros.

    His research group is able to slide the tiny magnets along notched nanowires at speeds greater than 100 meters a second. Since the tiny magnetic domains have to travel only submolecular distances, it is possible to read and write magnetic regions with different polarization as quickly as a single nanosecond -- far faster than existing storage technologies."

    What is really really old is new again, eh?

    I can see it now - to erase your iPod, turn it on its side and shake - just like an Etch-a-Sketch!

  14. Re:3rd dimension and cooling by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's the concept, with a nice animated gif: http://www.almaden.ibm.com/spinaps/research/sd/?racetrack

    The genius of the design is that the bits can be moved along the nanowires, allowing tens to hundreds of bits or maybe more to be accessed by only one reader. The readers can be fabricated in an array on a chip, and the wires can be hung from above, storing the data vertically. AFAIK they haven't yet gotten to the point of figuring out fabrication issues for the nanowire parts, like making a vertically oriented array and aligning them to readers. So far they have been working on getting the racetrack part working. That is, they have been working on using an electric current to shift magnetic domains longitudinally along a nanowire, and reading/writing the domains. And actually, the article seems to suggest that they are ignoring the 3-dimensional nanowire fabrication issues for now, and are going to make prototypes with the wires fabricated traditionally, 2-dimensionally, on a chip surface, which may still be competitive with Flash.

    As for heat issues, Hopefully the amount of current necessary will be small and thus the wires themselves will generate little heat. I would imagine that this design would have fewer transistors than, say, a DRAM, since the transistors will not be storing the data themselves. The transistors remain 2-dimensional, only on the chip surface. The wires are the only 3-dimensional part.

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  15. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by pclminion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah. Because there certainly has not been a leap from hard drives the size of a washing machine, to drives the size of a toaster, to drives of modern form factor. And there definitely has not been a progression from 1 megabyte to 20 megabyte to 200 megabyte to 1 gigabyte to 20 gigabyte to 150 gigabytes... No siree, it's all a big lie.

    Everyone knows that hard drives are vaporware. And the idea of computer performance increasing exponentially? I mean who the hell would believe that shit.

  16. Re:Interesting Concept by Climate+Shill · · Score: 3, Informative

    This New Scientist article from centuries ago is slightly clearer.

  17. Fermat Jr.'s Last Theorem by sehlat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a truly marvelous proof of this proposition which this 50TB hard drive is too small to contain.

  18. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by brarrr · · Score: 3, Informative

    So true. I'm one of the people in the small community of physics.... and he didn't invent GMR. First publication was in 88 by Baibich. Not to discount the contributions that Parkin has made, but he was not the inventor nor would making the claim that he is the single most important person in the field be correct...

    --
    to email me: take my /. handle and append .net preceded by charter.
  19. Whats really interesting.. by greywire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What makes this, and some other potential memory technologies, so interesting is that it would have the mass storage and non volatility of harddrives, the solid state of flash, and the speed of DRAM, or even exceeding that of current techs.

    This is interesting not because its "more, better, faster" but because it can completely change the way computers work. Imagine simply not needing all the storage tiers we currently have... disks, harddrive, flash, DRAM, cache... imagine something big enough and fast enough to cover it all. A CPU and this memory, and nothing else. It could mean big changes to your operating system. Imagine just not needing to load and save things anymore. Imagine not needing elaborate schemes like virtual memory paging, harddrive caching, file systems, or even needing to compress things as often. There's all kinds of overhead and mechanisms in our OS's that are currently needed to deal with all the different storage hardware and their limitations.

    If this memory can work fast enough, it could even change the way CPU's are designed. It could change almost everything.

    --
    -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.