Slashdot Mirror


World Series of Video Games Cancelled

Goobergunch writes "The official site for the World Series of Videogames is now indicating that the WSVG, including planned events in Los Angeles, London and Sweden, has been cancelled. The WSVG included competitions for Guitar Hero II, Quake 4, World of Warcraft Arena, as well as Counter-Strike and Warcraft III. From the announcement: 'The continuing challenges of securing adequate revenues to sustain the production of the WSVG's large scale events and television programming, in a very crowded field of competitive gaming leagues, has prompted us to re-evaluate our direction as an organization. Unfortunately, the decision is to cancel the remainder of the WSVG season, as we shift our focus solely to growing our online advertising network of websites, which currently reach seven million users each month. '"

11 of 42 comments (clear)

  1. I feel a disturbance in the force by techpawn · · Score: 5, Funny

    As if thousand of gamers who sucked at sports cried out and where then silenced

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    1. Re:I feel a disturbance in the force by Notquitecajun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other side of this, we are seeing an interesting new breed of athlete...particularly football. The Madden Football generation is playing now, and with its fairly complex play-calling ability, what we are going to find is there may actually arise some Gen-X coaches who...ahem...know how to handle clock management. LOTS of football players are learning how to be more intelligent about the game through video games, and it gives coaches an interesting way to simulate plays and game situations.

  2. Not to be a troll but... by east+coast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I kinda give this a "Ah, who cares" vote.

    Not in the fashion of "Why is this on Slashdot!!??!?oneone!!" but more of a "watching people play video games is boring" way.

    The great thing about video games is that, for the most part, I can wake up at 4 AM and still get my game on. I don't need to go someplace or find people to play them with.

    Organized team sports are interesting to the public because it involves the swilling of beer and a bunch of guys out on a field doing something as teams. I'd be hard pressed to get enough people together to play a legal game of baseball or football. Luckily with video games I don't need to worry about it.

    And even with a large group of skilled professional athletes there really isn't too much of a thrill in watching someone else play anyway.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:Not to be a troll but... by umbra_dweller · · Score: 4, Funny

      And as always must be pointed out when people bring up this argument, one need look no further than South Korea to prove that it is possible if you can find the right audience. There are entire channels devoted to single games - people even show up to watch those tournaments live! Once I was passing by one of the matches being filmed in a mall plaza - there were dozens of people straining to watch the computer screens over the gamers shoulders. I doubt it could achieve that level of mass-appeal in the U.S., but I think there is a sizable subset of the population that could become interested.

      Besides, you can still hang out, swill beer and even make bets on the outcome of a Starcraft match. I've seen it done.

    2. Re:Not to be a troll but... by east+coast · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Besides, you can still hang out, swill beer and even make bets on the outcome of a Starcraft match. I've seen it done.

      I know there is a CounterStrike mod that allows eliminated players to bet on the outcome of a match using in-game funds.

      But as a drinking game? My idea is to use it as a handicap and not a punishment. Let the survivors of the winning team drink a drink or two to help level the playing field. I think it would have some interesting results.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  3. I was just getting used to watcing it on TV by Ang31us · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Been watching WSVG events on GamePlay HD. I especially enjoy watching the Warcraft 3 games. I think WSVG could have grown more on TV, but they can't exactly count on advertising revenue from television to make back the $$$ they invest on the location, hardware, technical staff, and production costs...what a shame.

  4. Actually, it was quite entertaining... by voidstin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I caught an episode about a month ago. The guitar hero battles were really entertaining. For me, it hold the same allure as watching tennis. "holy crap, I can't believe they did that". I think it's harder to see teh expertise of the players in some of the other games though, and consequently it's less engaging. Hopefully, they be reborn as a video podcast of the events..

    Here's a link to somene ripping on "Jordan". If you've tried that song, watch in awe...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-XNmJ58Y1c

  5. Different Model for Revenue by MBraynard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why not make it more like the World Series of Poker tour where people show up at a venue and pay a fee that goes towards the total pot and the profit or the organization and they sell the TV rights to some cable network and or go halves on the ad revenue.

  6. Re:In other words.... by egyptiankarim · · Score: 2, Funny

    But I was all ready to kick butt at Super Mario with my Power Glove!

    --
    Eek!
  7. The main problem: It sucked. by devnull17 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This should come as absolutely no surprise to anyone. The WSVG was insultingly dumbed-down and content-free ("Wow! Was that an ice block?!?"). I'm a semi-serious WoW player, and my friends and I all found their arena coverage to be completely devoid of any meaningful content. I realize that their aim was to attract a wider range of viewers, but "normal people" don't give a rat's ass about competitive videogaming (and probably never will in the US), and people who do care would probably prefer coverage and analysis from people who have actually played the games before.

    Just look at the judging methodology for the Guitar Hero competition: ten points each for style, technical correctness and difficulty, each determined by a single judge. Two of the three judges were D-list celebrities who had probably never even played Guitar Hero. The extensive statistics provided by the game after each song were completely ignored in the decision process. The whole thing was structured much more like an episode of Nickelodeon GUTS than a serious competition designed to determine the best player.

    The 2:1 commercial-to-programming ratio couldn't have helped, either.

    In short, the whole thing was a commercially oversaturated, content-starved mess; I'd like back the hour of my life that I spent watching it, and no one will be the least bit sad to see it go.

  8. Re:Watched the first episode. by nutshell42 · · Score: 2
    It was pretty boring when I watched it after recording it on my VCR (yes, old school). I don't think this type of show would work for U.S. compared to South Korean where it is popular.

    There are a number of different but related problems:

    • Most sports are boring if you know nothing about them.
    • The average American still thinks videogames are either stuff like pong or terrorist training tools
    • Many computer games are more complicated than most real world sports, making it harder to appreciate the subtleties (and even with stuff like football that has a rulebook that's 3000 pages, those rules are often just as much about making the game *look* right for spectators as about having it feel right for the player)
    • to circumvent those problems mainstream coverage is oversimplifying which doesn't get them more average viewers but turns off the enthusiasts.

    On a positive note, there's youtube. Watch the MSL final (with excellent commentary by Klazart) here. A really great match over 5 games that had both great rushes and macro-heavy games.

    I don't know whether it would impress anyone who doesn't know anything about starcraft but football broadcasts also don't explain what a blitz is every time one occurs. Even if you don't understand the terms at first, you will still get a feeling for the depth and flow of the game and you'll either learn the terminology over time, or the sport will simply bore you but that's a problem that's not really unique to esports.

    IMHO watching baseball is like watching grass grow but the networks don't try to "fix" that by aiming their shows at 6yr olds because that would only lose them lots of existing fans. Soccer tried stuff like that in the US btw. No draws, clock stopping every time there's a foul and of course the all-glitz NY Cosmos. It was a disaster. Despite Beckham, it seems they've learned they're lesson, they try to stay true to the game and cater to soccer fans, instead of trying to wow otherwise disinterested people with fluff.

    Taking your viewers and your topic seriously is the key to growing your audience.

    --
    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage