Slashdot Mirror


Texas Family 'Sues Creative Commons'

An anonymous reader writes "A Texas family has sued Creative Commons after their teenaged daughter's photo was used in an ad campaign for Virgin Mobile Australia. The photo had been taken by the girl's youth counselor, who put it on Flickr, and chose a CC Attribution license, which allows for commercial use. Virgin did, in fact, attribute the photo to the photographer, fulfilling the terms of the license, but the family is still suing Virgin Mobile Australia and Creative Commons. 'The lawsuit, filed in Dallas late yesterday, names Virgin Mobile USA LLC, its Australian counterpart, and Creative Commons Corp, a Massachusetts nonprofit that licenses sharing of Flickr photos, as defendants. The family accused the companies of libel and invasion of Chang's privacy. The suit seeks unspecified damages for Chang and the photographer, Justin Ho-Wee Wong.'"

3 of 524 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why the License by Firehed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well the good news is that when you're an organization like Creative Commons, you're basically a team of lawyers with a marketing department.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  2. Re:Why the License by anagama · · Score: 5, Funny

    Old saying: If there is one lawyer in town, he goes broke. If there are two, they both get rich.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  3. Re:Why the License by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Remember, it's 99% of the lawyers who give the rest a bad name.