Slashdot Mirror


PC Makers Offering a Bridge Back To XP

The Telegraph is reporting on efforts by PC manufacturers to give customers buying systems pre-installed with Windows Vista a much-sought way to downgrade to Windows XP. ( A few months back we discussed Microsoft's similar concession for corporate customers.) "It took took five years and $6 billion to develop, but Microsoft's Vista operating system, which was launched early this year, has been shunned by consumers — with computer manufacturers taking the bizarre step of offering downgrades to the old XP version of Windows."

18 of 523 comments (clear)

  1. I've been out of it but... by victorvodka · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm a computer-using professional, (a web developer, actually) and I haven't bought a computer in years (who needs to? a five year old Pentium IV does everything anyone needs a computer to do!). So I was amazed back in July when a friend and I went to a Circuit City and then Best Buy on a "cheapest laptop we can walk out with" quest. XP was already gone and the pimply-faced Nerd Patrol/Geek Squad/FireDog/CatFucker people all told us that installing XP on these computers was impossible. They said they'd tried and it couldn't be done. I remember wondering if perhaps this was the end of the Microsoft Universe, since there was no way we'd be getting a Vista computer. The only use for multiple cores and 4 gigs of RAM is if 80% of your CPU cycles are given over to DRM and Norton 360.

    --

    The flag just makes more sense than the constitution. - Judas Gutenberg

    1. Re:I've been out of it but... by sqrt(2) · · Score: 4, Informative

      That all sounds good, but right now our hardware is way ahead of the software. The programs and operating systems aren't smart enough to make full use of the extra cores in the way you describe to get the real performance boosts that are possible. I'm sure that will change as dual and quad core processors become more and more common and eventually standard.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    2. Re:I've been out of it but... by Machtyn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Again, I completely agree. The hardware is way ahead of the software. Fortunately, the video editing software I use does make use of the multi-cores (and it's a joy to watch the CPU performance meter peg at 80% on each 2.2GHz core). And Windows XP does have the ability to tie certain processes to a certain core (right click on a process in Task Manager, make the process Affinity choose a specific core).

      I'm sure there are some kernel stuff that should go into Windows and Linux to optimize core usage better than it is now.

    3. Re:I've been out of it but... by Lorkki · · Score: 2, Informative

      So long as you can run a basic text editor, MS Paint and a web browser, you can call yourself a web developer. By that rationale, a 233MHz processor, 128mb of ram and a 1.5gb hard drive meets those requirements (XP min specs).

      Just to remind you, in light of the GP's claim, five years ago we had the Athlon XP at around 1.5 GHz, G4 PowerMacs somewhere in about 1+ GHz and the Pentium 4 probably over 2 GHz pushing the raw clock count. As long as you have enough memory and disk space, you won't have any problems designing your web sites even if you use a good text or WYSIWYG editor alongside Photoshop and have several browser versions to test with. (And if you design your sites with Flash, I don't know or frankly even care.)

    4. Re:I've been out of it but... by spyrochaete · · Score: 3, Informative

      My sister just bought a laptop with a fair number of bells and whistles - webcam, fingerprint scanner, touch screen, portrait/landscape image flipper, and more. The machine comes with Vista preinstalled and although it comes with no reinstall disks it has a dedicated image partition with instructions on how to burn your own recovery disks. (pretty chintzy, eh?)

      Naturally, she got an email from her university just after buying her laptop, saying that Vista is incompatible with many features on the Blackboard scheduling and class management system. I decided to install XP for her since she's more familiar with it anyway. No dice. Much of her hardware, including, surprisingly, her GeForce Go 6150 video card, has no Windows XP drivers developed! I searched for many drivers but could only find message board threads featuring questions about where the heck the XP drivers were. Long story short, my third attempt to recover the system worked and she's back to Vista.

      It seems that she doesn't even have the option to revert to XP. I hope she doesn't need much troubleshooting (that's wishful thinking) because my few experiences with Vista have been befuddling.

  2. About to "down grade" my laptop by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ok, I've been using Vista Ultimate (Yes, I PAID for it. Shut up already) on my Acer Ferrari 3200 lappy. Why? Two reasons.

    1. Acer abandoned XP driver support on my laptop shortly after launch. I've had to scour the net for updated Wifi drivers from HP and other places that supported my ATI mobile 9700. Windows Vista OTOH, supported all my hardware on the first install.

    2. I support Windows servers and desktops. I figured now would be a good time to learn Vista including all of its quirkiness.

    How did it go? Well...Vista is a POS to be blunt. It's slow to boot up, next to impossible to access work group resources, application compatibility issues, and next to no 3rd party VPN app support. It's a good thing I kept my collection of XP drivers for this laptop, cause I'll be nuking the drive and loading an XP SP2 build within a month.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  3. Re:Bizzare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Driver issues, probably. I have seen 10+ minute boots several times with a few laptops upgraded from XP to Vista Ultimate (though not with the fresh install).

    Then if you check the logs, it will tell you that some DLL hung for 612 seconds or whatever. (I also saw that 612 several times so perhaps it is a magic driver timeout number for Vista?)

  4. Deja Vu? by kaos07 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Isn't this exactly the same as this story: http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/29/1657256

  5. Re:My one experience with Vista by Zantetsuken · · Score: 2, Informative

    You guys might wanna check out Xming. It's a standalone X server compiled for Windows, so you'll still need to use something like PuTTY. I haven't tried it on Vista, but it hasn't crashed once on me in XP - it does at least claim Vista support, but again, I can't say about that. One of the good things I like about it is it doesn't have any Cygwin dependencies. The other thing I like about Xming is that unlike some of the commercial X servers for Win32 I looked through (Hummingbird Exceed, etc) is that this is free (as in beer, and AFAIK, speech)...

  6. Re:Bizzare? by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Informative

    How about VirtualBox + ReactOS ?

  7. "down grade" your laptop? DO IT! by plierhead · · Score: 4, Informative

    My own little experience with Vista...

    I was happy enough with XP.

    Then some mofo lowlife stole my laptop so have just been forced to get a new one. The shop said they "can't" provide machines with XP, so I was forced to use Vista (with hindsight I should have shelled out for a copy of XP and downgraded the machine).

    The weird thing is, you can sense the stirrings of some actual respect for decent security underneath the glittering, laquer-coated turd that is Vista. But sadly, the actual implementation is just as bad as I feared.

    My first 2 hours were lost just trying to get an ssh shell working again.

    - cygwin doesn't run (easily) - file permission problems. Need to become Administrator to fix them.

    - turns out that under Vista, just because your account is an "Administrator account", does not mean you are an Administrator. No, there is an actual Administrator (root) user, which has been thoughfully disabled.

    - you can google plenty of instructions for turning on the Administrator account - but because I have the artifically crippled "Home Premium" edition, those menu options are simply not there. I eventually work out that I need to go to the dos box and type "net use blah blah". Finally I can log in as Administrator and change file permissions.

    - despite all this, I still find I need to disable UAC to do things from time to time - and of course, reboot whenever I change it. But at least finally cygwin works.

    Despite all of these new annoyances, MS has thoughtfully retained some of the quite annoying features of XP (and probably of the devil's spawns that preceded it). eg if you leave a network drive connected, then go to another network, then doing "file open" in an app such as Word freezes for a few minutes.

    I think MS has had little choice in releasing Vista. Their bad designed decisions in the past - always favouring absurd "one click and its running" ease of use over normal security procedures - have come home to roost, forcing them to paint themselves into the corner they're in now.

    --

    [x] auto-moderate all posts by this user as insightful

  8. The sad thing by kylehase · · Score: 2, Informative
    is for many users who bought Vista PCs and are able to get XP recovery CDs, they'll have to run a destructive recovery to get XP on their boxes. That is unless there's a new autoplay option on the XP CD

    Windows XP CD detected. Would you like to:

    • Open CD using Windows Explorer
    • Copy CD using Roxio
    • Downgrade from Vista
    --
    You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
  9. Re:Microsoft : Always badly imitating Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "PPC -> Intel did the same thing again, or will the second Apple drops support for their PPC hardware."

    Guess what Apple just announced? No MacOS X Leopard for PPC 800Mhz. The only supported-by-someone operating system for those machines will be... Fedora. How weird is that?

  10. Re:The issue is Control by smash · · Score: 2, Informative
    Erm.

    Either my Vista X-Fi drivers or NVIDIA drivers do not support DRM. I know this because it had in the release notes "Digitally protected content is not supported" or words to that effect. They're signed drivers.

    The issue is quality control... not DRM control.

    smash

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  11. One advantage Vista has over XP by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Informative

    With the release of XP, Microsoft started that delightful policy of dissuading manufacturers from including stand-alone install media with new computers (of the kind that frequently ends up on eBay). If you want to reinstall Windows, you have to use the system restore disks to reinstall everything, OEM crap and all, and we all know the only realistic way to get rid of all of it is to format your hard drive and reinstall the OS alone. I'm still toying with finding a warez copy of Home OEM and trying the product key on my old laptop's XP sticker and seeing if I can get that to work.

    Vista, supposedly, has the same problem, but that little "Windows Anytime Upgrade" disk that comes with your new computer, conveniently (and undocumentedly, of course) works as install media. When I use it to reinstall Vista and use the product key on my new laptop, I always end up having to call Bangalore to finish activation, but it's still more than what I can accomplish with an OEM XP install.

    With that said, I'd still throw on one of my retail XP licenses instead if I could find drivers for everything.

  12. Re:Good riddance by gblues · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is because Vista defaults to NTLMv2 authentication, rather than LanMan/NTLM authentication that previous versions used.

    There are two solutions:

    1) Enable NTLMv2 authentication on the domain (upgrade to Samba 3.0.22 or newer)
    2) Change Vista's settings to the old behavior.

    Seriously, like 10 seconds of googling would tell you how to fix this. And this isn't a flaw in vista, any more than having telnet off by default is a flaw in a GNU/Linux system.

  13. Re:Bizzare? by Inner_Child · · Score: 2, Informative

    How about VirtualBox + ReactOS ? I'm just guessing here, but he probably wants his software to actually work. Nothing against the ReactOS team at all, but it has a long way to go before it catches up to WINE, let alone Windows. I do hope it gets there. And when it does, I hope it's feature-complete. (That's feature, not "feature" complete.)

    I currently use VBox + XP in seamless mode to run software required for one of my classes because it will not run in any other environment I've tried. Maybe someday.
    --
    Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
  14. Re:Bizzare? by Inner_Child · · Score: 2, Informative

    *cough*

    It would appear I've spoken a little prematurely, so I apologize. ReactOS has made some insane strides recently. Looks like I should do a little research before running my mouth, eh?

    --
    Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.