I'm a subscriber to the independent Australia media service Crikey. It costs me more than $100 a year so why do I do it? Pretty much all the reasons you've listed.
Dozens and dozens of articles everyday on politics, media, culture, lifestyle, the environment and sport. Some really good quality journalism, often by ex-mainstream media journalists and opinion pieces from well known individuals. A lot of the time they break stories as well, which the papers then play catch up with the next day.
Convenient access! I'll say. All the stories emailed to your inbox (on your computer or phone) as a digest every day and links to the stories progressively twittered as they are published.
When I signed up I got a free t-shirt designed by the resident cartoonist. Lots of merch available as well.
I feel absolutely no sympathy for the Murdoch press or anyone else in the old model of media. This is the way the new media should be run. It's great.
They've committed themselves to structural reform and floated not only the idea of complete open-access for this network (which is a given, this lot is far more clever than the previous bunch) but forcing separation on the existing copper network.
Rubbish. Do a tiny bit of research. NO ONE in Australia has access to 100mbps. SOME people have cable (10mbps) and SOME people live next door to the DSLAM and get 24mbps ADSL2+. I live in the inner-city, but I'm stuck between two exchanges so I only get 8-10mbps. Me, and 90% of Australia will be getting fibre to the home and speeds of 100mbps. Unfortunately for rural folk, it's completely un-feasible to roll out fibre to every backwater town. So to make up for that, they're getting what they were promised at the last election - 12mbps.
What a rubbish post. "Rolling back of benefits"? Er no. Seniors are actually receiving thousands of dollars in cash bonus' on top of their fortnightly stipends and this is to pre-empt the conclusion in the report into pensions due for release in the next few months. As for "families having babies" you're presumably talking about the means test for the baby bonus. Prior to the means test, everyone who had a baby got a cheque for $5000 - a blatant bribe. Now, that cheque is only available for people earning less than $150,000, which frankly, is still way to high.
They'll probably contract out the development of the next Flight Sim, if they choose to develop it. Firing the dev team helps their balance sheet in the short term and when they choose to develop it they might lease the license or hire an external company to develop the game.
Obviously the teacher can't do this. But WTF is happening to Slashdot. Since when is a question posted on an unnamed off-topic forum a reasonable story?
Simple example to show the flaw in your logic. You think viewing numbers for a program like House in now reflect the future production of the show? Of course they do, just like with EVERYTHING ELSE. Child porn is not static, it's continually being made. Of course you're not a pedophile as watching child porn doesn't seem to fit your definition of that.
You're an idiot and your circular logic is pathetic. Yes, if no one watched child porn it would continue to be made. Yes, watching something in no way contributes to it's supply. I think only one group of people defend those who watch child porn with such a stupid argument and I bet you know who they are.
Yes, the person viewing child porn may not be out molesting, but he's viewing a child being molested... So in the end, you're still getting children being molested and filmed. Unless of course, you think it's reasonable to throw a few kids into the fire to potentially lower child molestation rates in other parts of the world/country, thus taking the burden completely off the paedophile.
Right, because "sin" is "all the elements of religion". On that logic you could pretty much call scientists proclaiming the dangers of lung cancer as a religious cult.
Equating decades of scientific research to a story tale about a Jewish carpenter and his drinking buddies is ridiculous.
No, it's not a replacement for anything. this was a pre-election promise that is now a policy. The 9-12 "bracket" was what was decided by the Government. It may actually be 10-12, bot 100%. Either way the summary is incorrect and giving laptops to 12 year olds would be ridiculous.
The reason is that the government needs to consider all reasonable options and can't simply dismiss the biggest software provider in the world without potentially opening itself up to claims that the tender process was prohibitive.
Here's an idea - Can the thousands of people who are reading Slashdot sign the petition? Sure you're not Aussies, but Australia is not the first country to try something like and it won't be the last. Plus, the internet being what it is (without borders) there's a strong case for international involvement and international uproar to this filter.
No, I'm saying "economic indicators" are not the only one. Why don't we care Germany's prices to Polands? Polands to Russia's? Russia's to Chinas? Frances to England's? England's to Ireland's? You think method of production is the only variable? Silly.
And why exactly are you comparing two, outdated technologies when you really should be comparing them to solar thermal, photovoltaic, wind, hydro, tidal and geothermal?
It's because rusted on nuclear proponents are still living in the 70's and honestly believing that nuclear is so good compared to coal, but they can never win the debate against renewables.
No, it's because they didn't pass on the complaints to customers and because they're tiny.
For some reason every story about iiNet on Slashdot mentions that it's the "Second largest ISP in Australia". That's just plain wrong. By customer base and by infrastructure it's at least the fourth if not the fifth. And when you considering that the number one ISP, Telstra, has something like 70% market share coming fifth isn't that a big a deal.
And that's the reason they're being targeted. Telstra doesn't pass on the infringement notices either. But they are an ex-government monopoly with immense resources, a lot of customers and a huge profile. iiNet is a minor player and an easy target for the "rights holders".
Slashdot Mirror
Good comment.
I'm a subscriber to the independent Australia media service Crikey. It costs me more than $100 a year so why do I do it? Pretty much all the reasons you've listed.
Dozens and dozens of articles everyday on politics, media, culture, lifestyle, the environment and sport. Some really good quality journalism, often by ex-mainstream media journalists and opinion pieces from well known individuals. A lot of the time they break stories as well, which the papers then play catch up with the next day.
Convenient access! I'll say. All the stories emailed to your inbox (on your computer or phone) as a digest every day and links to the stories progressively twittered as they are published.
When I signed up I got a free t-shirt designed by the resident cartoonist. Lots of merch available as well.
I feel absolutely no sympathy for the Murdoch press or anyone else in the old model of media. This is the way the new media should be run. It's great.
They've committed themselves to structural reform and floated not only the idea of complete open-access for this network (which is a given, this lot is far more clever than the previous bunch) but forcing separation on the existing copper network.
Rubbish. Do a tiny bit of research. NO ONE in Australia has access to 100mbps. SOME people have cable (10mbps) and SOME people live next door to the DSLAM and get 24mbps ADSL2+. I live in the inner-city, but I'm stuck between two exchanges so I only get 8-10mbps. Me, and 90% of Australia will be getting fibre to the home and speeds of 100mbps. Unfortunately for rural folk, it's completely un-feasible to roll out fibre to every backwater town. So to make up for that, they're getting what they were promised at the last election - 12mbps.
And one of the ISP's, Webshield, is only known because it's business model is based on already offering a "clean-feed" connection.
What a rubbish post. "Rolling back of benefits"? Er no. Seniors are actually receiving thousands of dollars in cash bonus' on top of their fortnightly stipends and this is to pre-empt the conclusion in the report into pensions due for release in the next few months. As for "families having babies" you're presumably talking about the means test for the baby bonus. Prior to the means test, everyone who had a baby got a cheque for $5000 - a blatant bribe. Now, that cheque is only available for people earning less than $150,000, which frankly, is still way to high.
They'll probably contract out the development of the next Flight Sim, if they choose to develop it. Firing the dev team helps their balance sheet in the short term and when they choose to develop it they might lease the license or hire an external company to develop the game.
Obviously the teacher can't do this. But WTF is happening to Slashdot. Since when is a question posted on an unnamed off-topic forum a reasonable story?
Simple example to show the flaw in your logic. You think viewing numbers for a program like House in now reflect the future production of the show? Of course they do, just like with EVERYTHING ELSE. Child porn is not static, it's continually being made. Of course you're not a pedophile as watching child porn doesn't seem to fit your definition of that.
You're an idiot and your circular logic is pathetic. Yes, if no one watched child porn it would continue to be made. Yes, watching something in no way contributes to it's supply. I think only one group of people defend those who watch child porn with such a stupid argument and I bet you know who they are.
He's creating the demand for it... You're whole premise is that if no one watched child porn it would still exist. That's ridiculous.
Your post doesn't make any sense.
Yes, the person viewing child porn may not be out molesting, but he's viewing a child being molested... So in the end, you're still getting children being molested and filmed. Unless of course, you think it's reasonable to throw a few kids into the fire to potentially lower child molestation rates in other parts of the world/country, thus taking the burden completely off the paedophile.
It's depressing you don't realise how rubbish that all is.
Right, because "sin" is "all the elements of religion". On that logic you could pretty much call scientists proclaiming the dangers of lung cancer as a religious cult.
Equating decades of scientific research to a story tale about a Jewish carpenter and his drinking buddies is ridiculous.
Which is why, of course, the current Prime Minister and the majority of the caucus are Anglican.
No, it's not a replacement for anything. this was a pre-election promise that is now a policy. The 9-12 "bracket" was what was decided by the Government. It may actually be 10-12, bot 100%. Either way the summary is incorrect and giving laptops to 12 year olds would be ridiculous.
No, the government never ruled out Microsoft. A third-party report stated that Linux would be the cheapest option and MS too expensive.
The reason is that the government needs to consider all reasonable options and can't simply dismiss the biggest software provider in the world without potentially opening itself up to claims that the tender process was prohibitive.
It's almost like you didn't even read the article...
to give a laptop to every school-aged child
No, the policy is to give upper high school children in years 9-12 a laptop not "every school-aged child".
Like others have said, this is definitely not true. Especially in Australia.
Here's an idea - Can the thousands of people who are reading Slashdot sign the petition? Sure you're not Aussies, but Australia is not the first country to try something like and it won't be the last. Plus, the internet being what it is (without borders) there's a strong case for international involvement and international uproar to this filter.
No, I'm saying "economic indicators" are not the only one. Why don't we care Germany's prices to Polands? Polands to Russia's? Russia's to Chinas? Frances to England's? England's to Ireland's? You think method of production is the only variable? Silly.
Sigh, one simple economic indicator with thousands of variables. Fail.
And why exactly are you comparing two, outdated technologies when you really should be comparing them to solar thermal, photovoltaic, wind, hydro, tidal and geothermal?
It's because rusted on nuclear proponents are still living in the 70's and honestly believing that nuclear is so good compared to coal, but they can never win the debate against renewables.
No, it's because they didn't pass on the complaints to customers and because they're tiny.
For some reason every story about iiNet on Slashdot mentions that it's the "Second largest ISP in Australia". That's just plain wrong. By customer base and by infrastructure it's at least the fourth if not the fifth. And when you considering that the number one ISP, Telstra, has something like 70% market share coming fifth isn't that a big a deal.
And that's the reason they're being targeted. Telstra doesn't pass on the infringement notices either. But they are an ex-government monopoly with immense resources, a lot of customers and a huge profile. iiNet is a minor player and an easy target for the "rights holders".