Nokia Buys Navteq for $8.1 Billion
mytrip writes to mention that Nokia has agreed to buy Navteq, Chicago-based maker of digital mapping and navigational software, for $8.1 billion. "Nokia's president and chief executive, Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo, said that location-based services were a cornerstone of Nokia's Internet services strategy, which is part of an overall plan to expand beyond the production of cellphones into user services like photos, video, music and games."
I know Google Maps (and I believe others) use data provided by Navteq (so the bottom of the maps say). I wonder if this purchase will affect them in any way?
I got you an Andes mint, but it melted in my pocket
This raises some interesting possibilities for where nokia's going with the next installment in their line of internet tablets (the Nokia 770/800/rumored successor to both). Navteq's software already runs on the platform, so it may be that nokia's thinking of integrating it more fully into their internet tablets (the next one is rumored to have built-in GPS).
I have a Nokia 6682. I bought a bluetooth GPS receiver for $60 and downloaded Route 66 (for "free") on it and it has been a fantastic GPS device for me. I would never drive without such a phone anymore. I actually like it more than any dedicated GPS device which for a decent one could easily take $500 as mounting a normal GPS would be a pain (and too easy to attract thieves to break your window and take it). With a cell phone based GPS, it's easily attached to the vent (holder included with the receiver), and really portable.
If Nokia provides gps software out of the box, it definitely will be the biggest factor for my purchase decision.
Here's the official press release. There's additional articles on Bloomberg and TradingMarkets.
This news was predicted after TomTom bought Tele Atlas last July, NAVTEQ's main competitor.
Animoog.org
Although I'm sure you were joking when you said "cash", here's an idea of how that much cash would look.
;(
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2008189,00.html
Considering that this is 2/3 as much ($8bn vs $12bn) you could scale down and say that if this were presented as packages of $100 bills, it would weigh approximately (363*2/3) = 242 tons.
It's somewhat annoying to measure cash in "tons of $100 bills" and to think that none of it going to me
Am I surprised that someone bought them? No. But I had expected more than a $0.03 premium!! This whole deal stinks of insider collusion, and I for one intend to vote 'No' on this acquisition with my shares.
So explain to me exactly why I should be patting myself on the back? If I wanted to sell at $78, I could have sold it at market price on Friday for that. I and every other shareholder just took it up the butt from the Board of Directors.
A significant number of GPS systems that run on phones that compete with Nokia use Navteq maps. Could or would Nokia stop licensing Navteq maps to non-Nokia phones? I find this troubling.
Fwiw, a few points for perspective:
After the Tom-Tom purchase of TeleAtlas, Navteq almost doubled from July (wow!): http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details?Symbol=NVT&csize=10&PositionId=3072161788&Event=peek&period=d.
You hit a home run because you owned a severely undervalued stock. A real value was applied to their nearest competitor and investors compared their market caps along with a premium. It's standard recognition of price disparity that all investors look for.
As far as the shareholders go, anyone who bought at the last peak in early '06 (around $51) still managed a gain of over 50%.
Btw, now is usually a good time to sell and book the gain. There will be a slight discount to the buyout price which represents the risk of the deal falling through. For a percent or two it's usually not worth waiting for the arbitrage to settle out.
Congratulations on a great trade.