Slashdot Mirror


MS Awarded "Best Campaigner Against OOXML"

HansF writes "Microsoft itself is the surprise winner of the FFII's Kayak Prize 2007, offered by the FFII in its call for rejection of Microsoft's OOXML standards proposal. The software monopolist is honored as 'Best Campaigner against OOXML Standardization.' FFII president Pieter Hintjens explains, 'We could never have done this by ourselves. By pushing so hard to get OOXML endorsed, even to the point of loading the standards boards in Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, Portugal, Italy, and beyond, Microsoft showed to the world how poor their format is. Good standards just don't need that kind of pressure. All together, countries made over ten thousands technical comments, a new world record for an ISO vote. Microsoft made a heroic — and costly — effort to discredit their own proposal, and we're sincerely grateful to them.'" If Microsoft doesn't send a representative to claim their 2500-Euro prize at the FFII General Assembly in November, FFII will give the money to Peruvian earthquake relief.

42 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Y'know.... by Cleon · · Score: 5, Funny

    In addition, MS has helped IT security improve more than any other company.

    --
    Gifts for Geeks - Stuff that really matters!
    1. Re:Y'know.... by Eevee1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And their CEO is a sane, rational man that is well respected by us of Slashdot.

    2. Re:Y'know.... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think they should be given the "Most Improved Award". It's not really an award, it just says you don't suck as much as you used to.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    3. Re:Y'know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which one is he? The sweaty one or the idea thief?

  2. I wouldn't be too smug by earthforce_1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They nearly won, and it isn't over yet - there is another vote coming up in Februrary.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  3. Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by tech10171968 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've already started seeing .docx format attachments in my email at the office. Never mind the fact that my office is nearly 100% Linux/FOSS (except for the sole Windows machine running proprietary apps requiring outdated API's); I'd figured that since the vast majority of companies I've seen haven't (yet) started to migrate to Office 2007 then maybe sending .docx fils to everyone might not be such a smart move. For now we simply kick these emails back along with a friendly reminder that we don't do .docx or OOXML here, and will never accept anyhting in that format. Microsoft says the 'O' in 'OOXML' stands for "open". My ass...

    --
    This space for rent!
    1. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Shados · · Score: 4, Informative

      thats an Office 2003 doc XML (not quite the same thing). You'd have had to unzip the docx first if it was actually one, and then would have a crap ton of files and stuff... which I beleive is similar-ish to the "competition".

    2. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "open". My ass... That's the idea, yes.
    3. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 4, Informative

      thats an Office 2003 doc XML (not quite the same thing). You'd have had to unzip the docx first if it was actually one, and then would have a crap ton of files and stuff... which I beleive is similar-ish to the "competition".
      Not necessarily. There is a plug-in for Office 2003 - provided by Microsoft to certain organizations[1] - that allows Office 2003 to produce OOXML natively through the normal methods - i.e. more natively supported than PDF and ODF.

      Also, I believe Office 2003 uses a normal ".xml" extension[2] for its version of OOXML, while OOXML from Office 2007 uses the normal Office extensions with an appended "x" or "m" (the "m" is if you have macros embedded) - e.g. ".docx" and ".docm".

      [1] Last I knew it was not available publically, however, a Google search turned it up (3rd result).
      [2] Search for "OFFICE" and you'll find a number of "OFFICE11" paths.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    4. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by garnetlion · · Score: 2, Informative

      The plug-in is only for Windows machines. Mac users are SOL.

    5. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Shados · · Score: 4, Informative

      That plugin is for Office 2003 and XP to use OOXML natively, correct. It works quite well, it IS available publicly, and its quite commonly deployed (well, relative to the amount of environments using 2007, not in absolute terms).

      And the Office 2003 using XML is for a totally different format, which was also available in a previous version of office (though with less features), which is literally the Office 2003 format but in XML instead of binary, and is a totally different deal than the docx format from 2007, and existed years before Office 2007 came out. It is, for example, the format that is often used to generate Office documents through XSLT. It was used a "long" time ago, and I personally still use that format since it is simpler to generate document with for internal, short term purposes compared to docx, since it doesn't require the additional operation of putting the files together and zipping (which isn't a big deal, but its nice to be able to simply invoke an XSLT processor with no additional steps).

      The plugin above will use the virtually the same docx format, used the same way, as Office 2007.

    6. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can stick your head in the sand and pretend it's not so, but even so, some hapless customer will save his latest contract draft in Word and email it to me for review - personally, I'd like to read it.

      This argument cuts both ways and highlights the importance of open standards. I don't have windows at home, and my wife (definitely non techie - doesn't know the difference between a binary and its icon) doesn't want windows at home. Businesses that insist on communicating via windows specific technology get marked down.

      Her indoors is currently doing an online course with a private company that specified that she submit all work in doc format - after she had signed up. She asked if pdf was okay and the instructor said yes. A while into the course, her instructor changed and the new one couldn't even figure out how to open a pdf. She insisted on word documents.

      The ball and chain insisted on her money back if she couldn't submit in pdf, because nowhere in the advertising material or documentation did it mention having to buy software from a foreign monopoly to participate in the course until after the money was paid - my words, not hers.

      Her instructor knows how to open a pdf now.

      In my personal dealings with companies that want my business, I press save in open office and send the resulting file. If they can't read them, I ask them how they want them saved. I then usually save them as word documents and suggest they upgrade their office suite to one that can communicate with people who don't have word.

      If MS just bit the bullet and adopted ODF, interoperability would be so good. I understand they want to monopolise the desktop, but seriously, at home, why the fuck should I pay a foriegn company for an operating system? I support the machines myself, it's not like it's a corporate environment where support contracts are important. I refuse to pay Microsoft for their crap, and I don't particularly see the need to spend the crap loads of unjustified markup on OSX (even higher and less justified in Australia then the rest of the world).

      OOXML is not an implementable spec and ODF is so if businesses want to communicate with the widest possible range of customers, use a format accessible to everyone.

      Send only ODF and include a link to a free ODF import/export plugin for word.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    7. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could always bypass "protected" worksheets in excel, most other spreadsheets would simply ignore the "protection" when opening the file.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    8. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      // if, and when, a better tool is available, I'll find out the pros and cons of switching and make my decision based on the facts at hand and the recommendations of those I trust.

      Exactly, a file format should not be able to dictate what you switch to... Your devision of what to use might boil down to "we need to open files in format x, only y supports x so we must use y", regardless of so many other important factors like cost, performance, usability, stability, long term support etc.

      Without proprietary formats, you would be free to choose what truly is the best tool for your needs based on the actual pros and cons.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  4. you did the icon wrong by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Funny

    the foot should have been on top of gate's head...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  5. Microsft? A hero? by WK2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft made a heroic -- and costly -- effort to discredit their own proposal, and we're sincerely grateful to them.

    If I see an armed mugger robbing two women, and then run away screaming, and the robber looks at me for a second, giving one of the women enough time to open a can of woop-ass, that doesn't make me a hero.

    --
    Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    1. Re:Microsft? A hero? by Dak+RIT · · Score: 4, Funny
      A but you see there's no third party in this situation... the robber and the hero are one in the same.

      A better analogy would be the Yen Buddhists, who believe that the accumulation of money is a great evil and a burden on the soul and they therefore, regardless of personal hazard, see it as their unpleasant duty to acquire as much money as possible to reduce the risk to innocent people.[1]

      [1] With apologies to Terry Pratchett

  6. The medium is the message by DeepBlueDiver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd figured that since the vast majority of companies I've seen haven't (yet) started to migrate to Office 2007 then maybe sending .docx fils to everyone might not be such a smart move. Each time MS releases a new Office version, many corporate assholes^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H managers set a policy of using the new format on any communication. They don't care if you can't read the content, in fact, they hope you cant.

    Their message is "I am cool. I use the newest stuff. My dick is bigger than yours".
  7. They could win another award by Rolman · · Score: 4, Funny

    If OOXML finally dies, shall we give Microsoft a Darwin Award? Or perhaps a Richard Dawkins Award since it's a dying meme?

    --
    - Otaku no naka no otaku, otaking da!!!
  8. NO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't send the money to MS!!! Send it to me - I trolled bravely and gratuitously against/for whatever the thing is, and I've already send my money to Peru. Email me here to get contact info:

    ac@slashdot.org

  9. On behalf, by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just got off the phone with Mr Bill. He said I am supposed to accept the award for Microsoft. The only problem is that I am busy on the night it would be awarded. I could make a teleconference appearance but sadly would need assistance in getting the money back to Microsoft. If it is wired to me, I couldn't get through customs and we all saw that movie with tom hanks who had to live in an airport.

    If anyone with a valid checking account could help with this, I am willing to give them a small convenience fee of 10% plus any expenses. Please down load my personal instant messaging program and shoot me a message. If you have difficulty installing it, you can email me directly at 419 at nigeria.embasy Notice I used the "at" instead of the "@" sign in the email address to avoid spammers and scammers.

    Thank you in advance to anyone able to help.

  10. Vista makes me smile. by Erris · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't think the ISO organization will allow M$ to damage their reputation that way. The OOXML vote is an international scandal and the people who count are not going to forget it. The whole business has already been damaging to ISO and they would do better to bury ooxml.

    Just the same, I don't feel smug about how easily they damaged ISO. When I want to feel smug, I contemplate Vista's failure and what that means for the whole next generation of M$ crap and lock in.

    Vista is one of the best things that ever happened to free software. It's later, more restrictive more expensive and less functional than anyone could possibly have imagined. There is zero enthusiasm for it and a plenty of rejection.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:Vista makes me smile. by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just the same, I don't feel smug about how easily they damaged ISO. When I want to feel smug, I contemplate Vista's failure and what that means for the whole next generation of M$ crap and lock in.

      I'm not sure why it looks "easily" to corrupt ISO to you. It did take a lot of effort behind the scenes, give them credit where it's due.

    2. Re:Vista makes me smile. by Technician · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Vista is one of the best things that ever happened to free software. It's later, more restrictive more expensive and less functional than anyone could possibly have imagined. There is zero enthusiasm for it and a plenty of rejection.

      One of the best parts is WGA. Microsoft doesn't have the users who build their custom machines, but decide against the cost of the MS retail boxed version taxes. Spending $600-1200 on a custom box build soon finds the cost of an OS and Office suite a good part of building that can no longer be migrated from the old box. Alternatives to expensive restrictive software are now part of the cost decision.

      I used to upgrade hardware re-using my legal copy of Windows 98. XP and Vista have ended that process. XP now simply means it is residing on the oldest slowest machine in the house as it is not upgradable (without playing mother-may-I with Microsoft who may say no way). Vista is the same dead end. I am test driving Ubuntu Dapper Drake (the long term support distro), Fiesty Fawn (newer but has issues), and Freespire (out of the box rich Web browsing with codecs and flash) on my new home built hardware. XP will retire on the hardware it arrived on. In it's lifetime it only got a hard drive repalcement due to hardware failure and a memory upgrade. It won't be moving on to a Core 2 Duo box simply due to the EULA, vendor hardware specific recovery disc, and WGA to enforce it.

      Thank You Microsoft for closing the door on software re-use, right of first sale, and encouraging me to expand my horizons. I have learned the advantages first hand of not runing with administrator privilages, Software not vendor tied to hardware, open standards, community developement, GNU GPL, and no longer dealing with a per seat restrictive EULA.

      Thank You Red Hat, Caldera (pre SCO), Novell SUSE, Mozilla, Sun Microsystems, IBM, ODF, EFF, Adobe, and everyone else who made this possible.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  11. FFII? by Speare · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is this the Japanese numbering of Final Fantasy II, or the USA releases?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:FFII? by qcomp · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is this the Japanese numbering of Final Fantasy II, or the USA releases?
      actually, the abbreviation stands for the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure, a not-for-profit organization that has campaigned (in Europe), among other things, against software patents, excessive "intellectual" "property" rights and for open standards.

  12. Re:A ploy? by allthingscode · · Score: 5, Insightful

    History only partially backs you up on this one. Remember Microsoft's numerous attempts to define a networking standard so that they could crush the TCP/IP network protocol? NetBUI anyone?

    But yes, it can be hard to overcome the market leader. But, then again, if Microsoft were really sure that they controlled the market, why go through the trouble of standardizing? Because large parts of the world were looking elsewhere, especially governments.

  13. Chairstorm at Microsoft by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm imagining a hailstorm of flying chairs in an office somewhere.

  14. Re:A ploy? by jthill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just like Microsoft's Java corruptions set that standard, and their C corruptions set that one, and their HTML corruptions set that one, and (as pointed out above) their TCP/IP alternative set that one, and ... um. In their dreams. They haven't corrupted the language that far yet. Standards, see, standards are written documents everyone can consult to implement products that meet them. Microsoft's entire business model fails in the presence of actual standards.

    --
    As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
  15. Re:A ploy? by EvanED · · Score: 2, Informative

    Remember Microsoft's numerous attempts to define a networking standard so that they could crush the TCP/IP network protocol? NetBUI anyone?

    In MS's defense, TCP/IP wasn't a great option at the time either. MS was working with NetBEUI before DHCP came on the scene for instance.

    Sure, they could have put the effort they spent in developing NetBEUI into fixing their objections to TCP/IP, but there was also plenty of work done on NetBEUI by that point already as well, so I don't think it was clear at the time that TCP/IP was going to win out even on LANs.

  16. Re:Comments by counterfriction · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the sheer volume alone is illustrative of the weight of the outcry against it.

    --
    Sig free's the way to be.
  17. Re:Please help by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yay somebody finally found out where AC lives and is going to sort out the problem of trolls and frist posters once and for all!

    --
    I hate printers.
  18. Re:Comments by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how many of those comments are duplicates.


    I think duplicate comments would be even worse than unique ones. If a huge number of the reviewers see the same failings in the spec, then obviously the spec is clearly broken and should have been worked on more before even being submitted, much less before being considered for a fast-track approval.
    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
  19. Unfortunately... by vegiVamp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem is that this doesn't change much.

    They're still going to deploy it as the default document format for the new Offices. Lots of small and large companies are still going to upgrade their software at some point. OOXML is still very likely to become the new de facto standard due to common usage.

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
    1. Re:Unfortunately... by Xtifr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OOXML is still very likely to become the new de facto standard due to common usage. Whatever they came up with was likely to be a de facto standard of sorts. But blocking this from becoming a de jure standard is still a somewhat surprising victory, and we should celebrate winning a battle, even if the war is far from over.

      For that matter, for all its flaws, MSOOXML is an improvement over MS's older formats. While it may not be transparent like ODF, it is, at the least, fairly translucent compared to their earlier, opaque formats. The fact that they've gone as far as they have towards transparency is another sizable and often-overlooked victory.
  20. MS is experienced in shooting their own foot by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let's face it, folks. MS had the OS market in a stranglehold. They could've gotten away with pretty much anything. Bundling with hardware? No problem at all. Actually made the Average Joe user happy. Crappy bundled software like players and browsers? Zero problem either. Who doesn't know that there's better alternatives is happy with what he got. Mandatory registration? Already a bit of a nuisance to the average user (especially if he doesn't have internet access), but still bearable. Anyone will make a single phone call to use his computer.

    But then they stepped across the line where the average user grins and bears it. After a major repair, another call. After a few more, the spanish inquisition starts. People start to get nervous. They didn't do anything wrong, yet they feel as suspects for copying software. Software they bought honestly. People also care whether they can do what they used to do. Now DRM is hanging over their heads, and they start looking at their friends who use Linux, who don't have to call, who don't have to register, who get tons of software for free and legally so, and with the various installers the distributions have, it's also only a mouseclick away.

    People start to look around for alternatives. Being the moderator of a "non-geek tech board", I got a pretty good idea what bugs the "Average Joe" users and what direction they take. For about a year now, we have had a vastly increasing number in postings containing questions about Linux, which distribution to take, how to install it and how to get it going, quickly followed by quite happy notes how easy it was.

    I've been trying to talk them into it for a few years now. Until recently the response was mostly "What for?". Now there's a reason. So if anyone helped Linux become more of a mainstream system, it's MS.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. Re:Vista WGA by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think your fear of calling MS is unfounded. The phone people are tools and getting your registration updated is as simple as saying 'This is the only hardware this OS is installed on.' when they ask.

    That may be OK for a retail boxed version that comes with an install disk. This isn't OK for the OEM factory installed system. Just try to use a Dell recovery DVD on a homebuilt box. The EULA forbids the OS transfer and the recovery DVD program won't recover to another machine. With that in mind, the WGA hasn't actualy been tested. I just figured it was registered with a genuine Dell model XXXXXX and anything else is "Not Genuine".

    Therefore I didn't even try when I built a Core 2 Duo box to play with. I just stuck Feisty on it and enjoyed it.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  22. Re:Vista WGA by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just try to use a Dell recovery DVD on a homebuilt box. The EULA forbids the OS transfer and the recovery DVD program won't recover to another machine.

    I'm not sure what recovery DVD you're referring to... Perhaps something for Vista, or Media Center Edition? All of the Dells I've seen in the last year or two come with a recovery CD that works just fine on any machine. It's basically a regular WinXP install CD with a Dell label on it.

    We've got a bunch of these Dell recovery CDs floating around the office (Win2k, WinXP Home, WinXP Pro) that we use when we don't have recovery media for a machine (like the wonderful HPs with the recovery partition - hose the HDD and lose your recovery media too!).

    Obviously the licensing is tied to the machine. You can't transfer an OEM license from one computer to another. What you need to do is enter the OEM license from the sticker on the PC you're reloading. Generally speaking, it will activate online just fine. If it doesn't, just call Microsoft and tell them what happened. They don't generally ask a whole lot of questions, especially now that Vista is the hot item to have.
    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  23. Re:Vista WGA by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are correct, I did miss the point.

    If you're moving to a new home made whitebox then you cannot move your licensing. OEM licensing is tied to the hardware itself.

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  24. *Kayak* award? by GogglesPisano · · Score: 2, Informative

    Point of order:

    This is a kayak.

    These are canoes.

    That is all.

  25. Re:A ploy? by Nintendork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hooray for reverse-FUD! NetBEUI (Yeah, that's how it's spelled) wasn't made by Microsoft or even made for Microsoft. They adopted it as the default networking protocol when TCP/IP was still a little immature, the internet wasn't mainstream or readily available, and small business LANs were all the rage. It was actually a good choice for the time. Not that most people here really care about truth. Just post "Fuck M$ and WINDOZE" and you get modded as insightful.

  26. and it was risk free. by Erris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... in some parts of the world it was ridiculously easy to pass OOXML.

    In the US, the Wintel press has cranked up nonsense about how ooxml's demise was "political", which spins everything upside down. A company that owns it's own broadcast network, a sizeable number of newspapers, and spends a billion dollars a month in advertising does have it easy when it comes to blanketing the world with it's opinions.

    The attack was also easy because there is little downside to it from their persective. They hate all reasonable standards so the controversy's damage to ISO is a win even if they lose. They also think that the only people who will notice are people who hate them anyway. That's a gamble they have been losing more often and the crowd of people turned off is growing because of it.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.