Judge Voids Un-Auditable California Election
For only the second time in California history, a judge in Alameda County voided an election result and called for the election to be re-run, because the e-voting tallies from Diebold machines couldn't be audited. The vote was on a controversial ballot measure addressing the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries, and the result was a close margin. Activists went to court to demand a recount, but after the lawsuit was filed, elections officials sent voting machines back to Diebold. The court found that 96% of the necessary audit information had been erased. The judge ordered the ballot measure to be re-run in the next election.
I can think of another close vote they should do the same with.
If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
Change this to a presidential election (circa 2000) and try to recount an unauditable trail. Yeah, they argued about hanging chads and the whole mess, but there was a paper trail that said "absolutely, one voter, one vote, auditable". They even had a non-partisan group do a recount after the fact, and the paper trail showed that Bush in fact did win Florida. (uh oh, forgot to put on the flame retardant overcoat before I said that -- so folks, keep it cool -- I'm not particularly fond of Bush lately anyway!!).
But folks, I think that the significance of this decision is being totally overlooked, which is this: the American governmental system has worked again -- perhaps a rare again lately IMHO -- to let the people's voice be heard, in an accountable way. Good for the judge. Right call.
...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...