Slashdot Mirror


Judge Voids Un-Auditable California Election

For only the second time in California history, a judge in Alameda County voided an election result and called for the election to be re-run, because the e-voting tallies from Diebold machines couldn't be audited. The vote was on a controversial ballot measure addressing the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries, and the result was a close margin. Activists went to court to demand a recount, but after the lawsuit was filed, elections officials sent voting machines back to Diebold. The court found that 96% of the necessary audit information had been erased. The judge ordered the ballot measure to be re-run in the next election.

7 of 177 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Yay! Now ban the machines by RandoX · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, you would.

  2. Re:Corporations by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Funny

    the corporations seem to win no matter what you do

    You'd think that Frito-Lay would be all over this initiative. And Dominos. While it may be hard to re-muster the Stoner Caucus to do this all over again, perhaps the Munchie Cartel can pick up the slack.

    California. *sigh*

    There's plenty of reasons to re-invent electronically-assisted voting (I like the also-spits-out-paper variation, myself), but it really doesn't help the cause when - to a casual newsreader - an important test case seems to be about weed.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  3. The solution by clickety6 · · Score: 3, Funny



    We need to get rid of these electronic polling machines.

    They should raise a proposition on this so that we can vote on the issue.

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  4. Re:Corporations by cez · · Score: 4, Funny

    Plus... this is for a medical marijuana vote... I'm sure it was tough enough for supporters to make it to the polls the first time! Who imagines they'd actually remember when the revote will be...

    --
    Walk with Music;
  5. Re:Yay! Now ban the machines by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

    'd be nice to eliminate the source of the problem, rather than have to litigate over the after-effects.

    Agreed but it's highly illegal to take all politicians and corperate executives and kill them on pikes in public.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  6. Re:Why hasn't this been fixed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do others suggest it would be a bad one? Why? What is the reasoning behind that? Or was it just that nobody thought of that when designing the machines? Yeah, what were those guys smoking? Oh, wait...
  7. Re:Corporations by mrogers · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is a rare case of Diebold tallies matching the exit polls: the machines couldn't remember how the votes were cast and neither could the voters.