Slashdot Mirror


Judge Voids Un-Auditable California Election

For only the second time in California history, a judge in Alameda County voided an election result and called for the election to be re-run, because the e-voting tallies from Diebold machines couldn't be audited. The vote was on a controversial ballot measure addressing the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries, and the result was a close margin. Activists went to court to demand a recount, but after the lawsuit was filed, elections officials sent voting machines back to Diebold. The court found that 96% of the necessary audit information had been erased. The judge ordered the ballot measure to be re-run in the next election.

6 of 177 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Yay! Now ban the machines by RandoX · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, you would.

  2. Re:Corporations by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Funny

    the corporations seem to win no matter what you do

    You'd think that Frito-Lay would be all over this initiative. And Dominos. While it may be hard to re-muster the Stoner Caucus to do this all over again, perhaps the Munchie Cartel can pick up the slack.

    California. *sigh*

    There's plenty of reasons to re-invent electronically-assisted voting (I like the also-spits-out-paper variation, myself), but it really doesn't help the cause when - to a casual newsreader - an important test case seems to be about weed.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  3. The solution by clickety6 · · Score: 3, Funny



    We need to get rid of these electronic polling machines.

    They should raise a proposition on this so that we can vote on the issue.

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  4. Re:Corporations by cez · · Score: 4, Funny

    Plus... this is for a medical marijuana vote... I'm sure it was tough enough for supporters to make it to the polls the first time! Who imagines they'd actually remember when the revote will be...

    --
    Walk with Music;
  5. Re:Yay! Now ban the machines by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

    'd be nice to eliminate the source of the problem, rather than have to litigate over the after-effects.

    Agreed but it's highly illegal to take all politicians and corperate executives and kill them on pikes in public.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  6. Re:Corporations by mrogers · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is a rare case of Diebold tallies matching the exit polls: the machines couldn't remember how the votes were cast and neither could the voters.