Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Develop Cyborg Interface Algorithm

StCredZero writes "A ZDNet article discusses advances in the translation of brain activity to electronic control being made at MIT. Their approach allows a paralyzed individual to manipulate a prosthetic - but that's not the important advance. 'Other scientists have already done that, and built prototypes for neural brain-to-machine devices that can work for animals or humans. But each team has taken a different approach to the problem, such as developing algorithms for measuring activity in a specific brain region, or measuring them through EEGs vs. optical imaging. MIT said that it has developed a unified algorithm that can work within the parameters of these different approaches. Lakshminarayan "Ram" Srinivasan, lead author of a paper on the subject, said MIT's new graphical models are applicable no matter what measurement technique is used. "We don't need to reinvent a new paradigm for each modality or brain region," he said in a statement.'"

27 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. I for one... by gbulmash · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...welcome our future cyborg overlords.

    1. Re:I for one... by AmaDaden · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...welcome our standardized future cyborg overlords.
      Fixed

    2. Re:I for one... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...welcome our standardized future cyborg overlords.

      Resistance is futile.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    3. Re:I for one... by Spokehedz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Resistance is futile, but capacitance has potential!

    4. Re:I for one... by Mingco · · Score: 2, Funny

      Inductance reluctantly agrees.

  2. Nickname by iknownuttin · · Score: 2, Funny
    Lakshminarayan "Ram" Srinivasan, lead author of a paper on the subject,...

    I wish I had that kind of creativity. I tried going by the nickname of "Big Dick", but folks just laughed.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:Nickname by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then try using the name "Maha-lingam"

    2. Re:Nickname by east+coast · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why are you waughing? I have a very close fweind named Biggus Dickus.

      I demand that you stop waughing!

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  3. *yawn* by kevlarsoul · · Score: 2

    Wake me when this is applied to something useful. I'll be first in line to reduce myself to a bloody torso if I can replace all my limbs with robotic replacements. Then I will be your cybernetically enhanced overlord.

    1. Re:*yawn* by CheeseburgerBrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wake me when this is applied to something useful.

      Right -- because giving paralyzed people the ability to locomote and manipulate objects isn't remotely useful, is it? After all, who will buy supper for the accessibility ramp-makers once their industry dries up?

      I'm sending my quadruplegic friend over to your house right now to beat you up.

    2. Re:*yawn* by GenP · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll bite your knees off!

    3. Re:*yawn* by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not really being applied to that yet though. At the moment it's still just the promise of something on the horizon. I suspect the parent was just tired of too much hype with too little real world application.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    4. Re:*yawn* by crgrace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FleaPlus,

      The fact that the researcher is talking to a journalist prior to the research publication is strong evidence he is over-hyping his research. The way a journalist should learn about research is by reading a peer-reviewed article. Not a press release. Note that the article states the research WILL be published in the Journal of Neurophysiology. The only reason the researcher is talking to a journalist now is HYPE. Pure and simple.

      Carl

  4. Obligatory... by Starteck81 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Murphy, is that you in there?

    --
    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
  5. Humor? by packetmon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Still, he said, the algorithm isn't perfect, nor the final solution to solving what is a difficult problem.

    Lawyer: Did you mean to shoot your wife||husband?
    Defendant: I was so mad I may have thought about it but in no way did I consciously shoot him. My arm has a mind of his own
    DA: Objection your honor, defendant is saying what amounts to their "neural prosthetic aid that can link an individual's brain activity to the person's intentions; and then translate that intention into movement." that is just not possible.
    Laywer: Your honor, we have Slashdot, Groklaw and MIT printouts which show the validity of the defendant's claim
    Judge: Sustained

    1. Re:Humor? by necro2607 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, it's pretty funny you bring that up, as there's a Ghost In The Shell episode in which this very sort of situation occurs.

      A man with cybernetic limbs shoots and kills a woman. During the court trials, his defense lawyer (highly experienced with defending people with cybernetic prosthetics) says that the defendant wasn't used to his newly upgraded/installed cybernetic body parts (and the new control software for them) and thus fired the gun unintentionally.

      When I saw this episode, it was a bit of a shock to consider those kinds of situations where the natural self-control we take for granted could potentially no longer be in place, if we were to start to rely on technology to take the place of our physical bodies...

    2. Re:Humor? by Afecks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That conclusion goes against millions of years of evolution and modern computers. There is nothing uncommon about inferior mechanisms creating superior mechanisms. How do you think we got here today?

      Stop trying to get in the way of my X-RAY VISION and the STRENGTH OF 5 GORILLAS!!!

    3. Re:Humor? by necro2607 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, look at the software that runs your PC. You think that is more reliable than your own brain, for controlling limbs on your body accurately? heh! ;)

  6. don't we ever learn?! by valkabo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did no one watch Voyager?! This is how the end starts.. First we're all happy people with our little cyborg chips to control our sex bots, then suddenly we take real women and make them sex bots.. and they'd be all like "I love Mr. God man" and be rubbing us, and feeding us grapes.. maybe serving ice cold beer. .. .. .. Where can I buy these chips??

    1. Re:don't we ever learn?! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did no one watch Voyager?! No, no one.

  7. Computer Science Tenet by Mike+Morgan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anything is solvable with another layer of abstraction.

    --
    -USR1
    1. Re:Computer Science Tenet by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Anything is solvable with another layer of abstraction. That's it! We'll have virtual cyborg arms! We could try the whole thing a virtualization first, and then....but wait! Why stop there! We'll just make whole virtual cyborg bodies! After that, who needs real bodies! The brain'll be a sort of hypervisor ... you could be three people at once!

      What? Why is everyone looking at me like that?
  8. algorithm discovered by InlawBiker · · Score: 5, Funny

    10 FOR I = 1 TO 50 20 WALK 30 IF ROBOT = BUMPINTOSOMETHING THEN GOTO 50 40 NEXT I 50 PRINT "Ouch!"; 60 TURNAROUND 70 GOTO 10

    1. Re:algorithm discovered by djlosch · · Score: 3, Funny

      "what does your robot do?
      it collects data about the surrounding environment, then discards it and drives into walls"
      -- c/o bash.org

    2. Re:algorithm discovered by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Funny

      My gawd. His algorithm not only walks around a room full of obstacles, but it's also apparently capable of initiating a personal injury suit! True AI genius.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  9. Possible consiquences by Voltageaav · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The mouse and keyboard would no longer be needed. You would likely be able to interface with computers much faster as well allowing people to get more work done in a day, but at the possible cost of less motion needed. People with a chip in their head could possibly work from their bed, with just a screen on the ceiling. Advances in robotics will allow robot servants. They already have toy versions of these. Laziness is already a problem, and it will only grow as people have to do less and less. I know it's still a long way in the making, and I can't wait for things like this to become mainstream, but also fear it a little.

    --
    Someone save me from this sanity.
  10. Only a matter of time... by StCredZero · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...until we have 14 year olds piloting mecha to save the world. (Okay, the Eva aren't mecha exactly, but that's one of my favorite series.)