David Pogue Reviews the XO Laptop

Maximum Prophet writes "David Pogue, technology reviewer at the New York Times, has taken a first-hand look at the XO laptop, also known as the 'One Laptop Per Child' project, or the '$100 Laptop'. His reaction is very favorable, having tested it out via several criteria. And ultimately, he writes, the laptop is about more than just technology for the people. 'The biggest obstacle to the XO's success is not technology -- it's already a wonder -- but fear. Overseas ministers of education fear that changing the status quo might risk their jobs. Big-name computer makers fear that the XO will steal away an overlooked two-billion-person market. Critics fear that the poorest countries need food, malaria protection and clean water far more than computers. But the XO deserves to overcome those fears. Despite all the obstacles and doubters, O.L.P.C. has come up with a laptop that's tough and simple enough for hot, humid, dusty locales; cool enough to keep young minds engaged, both at school and at home; and open, flexible and collaborative enough to support a million different teaching and learning styles.'"

Comments

A child?? I must have turn the logo the wrong way

[DigitalReverend]

FTFA: "The laptop is now called the XO, because if you turn the logo 90 degrees, it looks like a child."

90 degrees in which direction? If you turn it the other way it looks like a skull and crossbones.

Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US

[MBCook]

That's flat out moronic. It's an amazing machine.

So why not sell them in the US?

• "It don't fit my hands?"
• "Where do I put the CD?"
• "Where is the start menu?"
• "Why can't my kids play XBox on it?"

These are ingenious little machines. It would be very smart to sell them to US consumers, but frankly I think the US computer market (something that includes me) tends to be... on average... far too ignorant to be able to buy these effectively. They will consider them all broken because they aren't "normal" computers.

All this is ignoring the fact the whole point of this project is to help 3rd world people, not give Americans another way to IM their friends.

They aren't underpowered, they have plenty of power. You don't NEED a dual CPU 2.x GHz laptop with 2 gigs of RAM to compute. This think would kick my Mac LC II around the block so bad it wouldn't be funny.

Re:Can I flash the thing

[timeOday]

The XO weighs over 3 pounds and is worse in every techinical respect (processor, memory, hard disk space, drives, etc).

RTA!

• 6-24 hours(!!!) of run-time
• The XO's battery is good for 2000 charges and costs $10
• The XO has a 200 DPI daylight visible screen(!!!)
• It can run on a 1' square, $12 solar panel
• Spill-proof keyboard

Just like the article says, this laptop has many significant advantages - not just over your $350 Compaq, but over my $3000 Thinkpad. I would really like to get one of these for my 9 year old - and I have no doubt my wife and probably myself would be stealing it often!

Re:What "need" does this fulfill?

[grcumb]

I won't perpetuate the popular stereotype of straw huts and rampant starvation and disease, but I don't buy into this assumption that African progress is being hindered by a lack of cheap computers, of all things.

I believe it was Duke Ellington who, when asked what Jazz is, famously said, "Man, if you gotta ask, you ain't never gonna know."

(And while we're at it: You are aware that the majority of the developing world is not in Africa, I hope?)

If you don't get why improved access to information is a fundamental prerequisite for development, then the XO will always look like wings on a fish. If, however, you can accept the premise that inadequate communications is one of the biggest stumbling blocks we face when trying to perform any kind of development work, then you will quickly see why people are so excited about this project.

I met a young doctor yesterday whose initial reaction was almost exactly the same as yours. She's dedicated to health education in the developing world, and she's very good at what she does. When she first read about the work we've been doing in the South Pacific, she immediately scoffed and insisted that we should try getting a steady supply of antibiotics and anti-malarials first. But just last week as she was conducting a walking tour of one of the poorest areas in the country, she realised what she could achieve if most or all of the children there had these laptops. She's since signed on to our national OLPC project as a content developer.

Solving communications is a necessary - but not sufficient - element of development. The XO doesn't remove the need for vast amounts of material aid, but it makes it so much easier for development projects to actually succeed.