Full Net Census Takes a Hint From xkcd
netbuzz writes "The University of Southern California Information Sciences Institute says it's the first full census of the 'visible Internet' since David Smallberg canvassed a piddling 315 allocated addresses in 1982. They're talking about 3 billion pings directed toward 2.8 million addresses over the course of 62 days. Oh, and they credit the comic strip xkcd for sparking the idea of presenting the data using a Hilbert curve." The main page for the census project has links to versions of the census at various scales.
People are doing this same thing constantly.
Not that its not cool, but acting like it hasn't been done since 1982 is grossly incorrect.
I'm colorblind and I can see the difference in shades just fine.
Maybe you should ask the people you're acting like you care about whether they actually need you to whine for them.
XKCD's writer shows his love for /. . http://xkcd.com/301/
The main difference being, of course, that designing visual medium so that it supports both color-blind and normal visioned people equally well is extremely easy. Designing visual media that supports blind people is extremely difficult. There's no excuse, other than ignorance (which is the real reason in most cases), for not supporting color-blind people.
I figure anybody who manages not to mistake the Isle of Slash for Slashdot deserves the extra points; Stallman's Airship is easy.
Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
It was a low bandwidth activity. Had you told the truth to your ISP, they likely wouldn't have given a shit.
As a part-time grammar nazi and xkcd reader, I'm not falling for that one. ;-)