Slashdot Mirror


Linux Kernel v2.6.23 Released

diegocgteleline.es writes "After 3 months, Linus has released Linux 2.6.23. This version includes the new and shiny CFS process scheduler, a simpler read-ahead mechanism, the lguest 'Linux-on-Linux' paravirtualization hypervisor, XEN guest support, KVM smp guest support, and variable process argument length. SLUB is now the default slab allocator, there's SELinux protection for exploiting null dereferences using mmap, XFS and ext4 improvements, PPP over L2TP support. Also the 'lumpy' reclaim algorithm, a userspace driver framework, the O_CLOEXEC file descriptor flag, splice improvements, a new fallocate() syscall, lock statistics, support for multiqueue network devices, various new drivers, and many other minor features and fixes. See the changelog for details."

38 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. You know the drill... by SnoopJeDi · · Score: 4, Funny

    overlord. welcome. yay.

    On a more serious note, are these improvements dramatic, or is story featured just because it's the newest Lolnus kernel?

    1. Re:You know the drill... by n+dot+l · · Score: 4, Funny

      overlord. welcome. yay. Hey! You butchered my second-most-loved meme, you insensitive clod!

      On a more serious note, are these improvements dramatic, or is story featured just because it's the newest Lolnus kernel? I don't know about dramatic, but the change does replace several core OS components, some of which generated quite a bit of buzz when development was first announced (too lazy to link some of the flame wars^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H discussions that news of a new scheduler generated).
    2. Re:You know the drill... by Randle_Revar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lolnus?

      I can has new scheduler?

      I had new scheduler but Linus eated it :-(

    3. Re:You know the drill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't use "meme" as a euphemism for "cliché". Seriously?? You don't really meme that, do you?
    4. Re:You know the drill... by SnowZero · · Score: 3, Funny

      In SOVIET RUSSIA, cliché euphemisms you.

    5. Re:You know the drill... by MadnessASAP · · Score: 2, Funny

      I feel a great disturbance in the meme.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
  2. Boom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    paravirtualization hypervisor. Sounds like one hell of a Machine Gun.
    1. Re:Boom. by Fuji+Kitakyusho · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't cross the streams. It would be "bad".

    2. Re:Boom. by germansausage · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean, "bad"?

    3. Re:Boom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.

    4. Re:Boom. by MoxFulder · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... the 'lumpy' reclaim algorithm, a userspace driver framework, the O_CLOEXEC file descriptor flag, splice improvements, a new fallocate() syscall, lock statistics, support for multiqueue network devices, various new drivers, and many other minor features and fixes. See the changelog [CC] for details." OMG!!!!!! The O_CLOEXEC file descriptor flag is coming out!!! My friend Tiffany is, like, *totally* gonna freak when she hears about it.
  3. SO EXCITED! by ILuvRamen · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm so excited, I wish I could have stayed up until midnight in a huge line for it! HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO SLEEP NOW?!

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:SO EXCITED! by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      This kernel has virtual Linux on Linux action! Why would you even want to sleep?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:SO EXCITED! by mkosmul · · Score: 2, Funny

      And when I saw SO_EXCITED I thought it was a new option for sockets.

  4. Yeah, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    yeah, but does it run... Oh. Nevermind.

    1. Re:Yeah, but by SnowZero · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, that is kind of the point of virtualization, isn't it?

  5. Yay upgrade! by nxtr · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I'll take the opportunity to upgrade to 2.2.26; I don't waste my time with unproven technology.

    1. Re:Yay upgrade! by zuricher · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great. And now could we please move along and assign all these resources on a more important matter, like the XBMC linux port?

    2. Re:Yay upgrade! by Nazlfrag · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bah! the fools are stuck in the past, what with those stable, reliable distros. When will they ever convert to Gentoo?

  6. we dont like guests from xen by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    After 3 months, Linus has released Linux 2.6.23. This version includes the new and shiny CFS process scheduler, a simpler read-ahead mechanism, the lguest 'Linux-on-Linux' paravirtualization hypervisor, XEN guest support

    Yes, what they don't mention is that the XEN "guest support" is in the form of a crowbar.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:we dont like guests from xen by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like xenophobia to me...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  7. Obligatory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    But does it run OS X?

  8. Re:Answer: Linux will never be GPL3. by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hello everybody out there using Linux -
    I'm doing a (free) operating system based on GPL3 (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like Linux) for x86. This has been brewing since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on things people like/dislike in Linux, as my OS resembles it somewhat (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons) among other things).

    I've currently ported bash(3.2) and gcc(4.2.2), and things seem to work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months, and
    I'd like to know what features most people would want. Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them :-)

    PS. Yes - it's free of any Linux code, and it has a multi-threaded fs. It is NOT protable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(.

  9. Re:A pre-packaged ISO, please... by Fireflymantis · · Score: 2, Funny

    It only costs your time. Rather than getting work done, you can spend hours compiling your software and acting arrogant. I'm sold! I simply MUST get this onto my office workstation!
  10. Re:Answer: Linux will never be GPL3. by zsouthboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    You forgot the hardcoded support for Swedish keyboard layout, only.

  11. Why do that much work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just take OpenBSD and re-release it under the GPLv3!

    1. Re:Why do that much work? by HeroreV · · Score: 3, Funny
      That sounds like a very fun idea.
      1. Person A obtains OpenBSD under the terms of the BSD license.
      2. Person A modifies all source files, which the BSD license allows, to also include a GPLv3 license statement.
      3. Person A distributes his modified copy to Person B.
      4. Person B accepts the terms of the GPLv3 instead of the BSD license.
      5. Person B strips out the BSD license, which he's allowed to do because he's not bound by the terms of the BSD license.
      6. Person B distributes his modified copy of OpenBSD which is now only under the GPLv3 license.
      7. Theo de Raadt explodes in a hurricane of rage, screaming that receivers of multi-licensed code must accept all licenses.
      8. Lawyers all disagree with Theo.
      9. Theo goes completely insane and ends up in a mental institution.

      Any takers?
  12. Hot by MrYotsuya · · Score: 5, Funny

    the lguest 'Linux-on-Linux' paravirtualization hypervisor

    Linux on linux, that's so hot!

  13. Re:Answer: Linux will never be GPL3. by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course you realize that no project which launches with that kind of announcement could ever expect to succeed.

    I mean, really. What are the chances?

  14. 1995 by ceroklis · · Score: 2, Funny
    FTF Changelog:

    2.11. UIO
    Click to read a recommended LWN article about UIO
    UIO is a framework that allows to implement drivers in userspace.

    Telling readers that links are meant to be clicked is so 1995!
  15. Re:Answer: Linux will never be GPL3. by Matt+Perry · · Score: 5, Funny

    Richard, is that you?

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  16. Blow by blow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This version includes the new and shiny CFS process scheduler,

    I know what I'm doing!

    a simpler read-ahead mechanism,

    And I knew it before you did!

    the lguest 'Linux-on-Linux' paravirtualization hypervisor,

    LeVar Burton would not approve of that kind of self-abuse!

    XEN guest support,

    Crabs are NOT invited to my head!

    KVM smp guest support,

    The sump reverses the M^V>K process?

    and variable process argument length.

    Oh great, now you'll never get them to stop bickering.

    SLUB is now the default slab allocator,

    Your build has now lost the battle of the bulge.

    there's SELinux protection for exploiting null dereferences using mmap,

    If you're going in those kind of holes, you better be wearing something slinky!

    XFS and ext4 improvements, PPP over L2TP support.

    No no, you put the TP over the PP 2 L8!

    Also the 'lumpy' reclaim algorithm,

    Mike Rowe? Have I got a job for you...

    a userspace driver framework,

    Better make it a rollcage.

    the O_CLOEXEC file descriptor flag,

    I thought only birds have those.

    splice improvements, a new fallocate() syscall,

    Your Linux will do anything for love but they WON'T do THAT!

    lock statistics, support for multiqueue network devices, various new drivers, and many other minor features and fixes. See the changelog for details.

    Whew. Time for my cigarette.

  17. Re:The real Linux news today. by kcbrown · · Score: 2, Funny

    Exploit code was wildly popular on milw0rm, indicating that this local exploit has lots of potential.

    Yeah, but it's a local exploit.

    For it to be an issue the attacker has to get onto the box first. I'm running Linux, and it's so secure that there's no way they can get in and#(*%^W(#^# NO CARRIER.

    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
  18. Re:Ummm. Neat. by Zoolander · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aahhh... I love the smell of car analogy in the morning.

    --
    Meep.
  19. Fuck! by robo_mojo · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I just finished compiling 2.6.22.9 :( Fuck!

  20. Personally I'll wait for the SP1 release by robo_mojo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Upgrade to 2.6.23 right now? Are you out of your mind? Everyone knows you're supposed to wait for the SP1 release before upgrading to a new operating system!

  21. Re:Methinks... by somersault · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm holding off upgrading until they implement the Harsh But Demonstrably Fair Scheduler

    --
    which is totally what she said
  22. Re:Methinks... by dotgain · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just as long as my wife's not in charge, I don't care.