Slashdot Mirror


Touch-based Handhelds Turned Inside Out

holy_calamity writes "Mitsubishi and Microsoft have made a prototype PSP-like handheld operated using a touch interface on the back — the idea is to give a firmer hold, prevent obscuring the screen and allow greater accuracy than the iPhone and others. The users fingers are shown as shadows on the screen so they can see what they're doing, making the device look transparent. As a video shows, it's far from market ready, but the design principle seems sound."

23 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Playing to the market by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Shadowy fingers behind the back of screen images should be a big advance for Porn Digital Assistants. I predict a win for this one.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Playing to the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Funny thing is, that camera behind the device points to dark surface, meaning high contrast levels (and accuracy) can only be achieved if you hands are white. It seems apparent that Microsoft hates niggers or they would have made back-panel white.

    2. Re:Playing to the market by SQLGuru · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, they should color the back panel green and hope that certain alien species and plants are the only ones that don't want to play? Or maybe go with blue....and hope that flowers, fish, and birds don't want to play?

      Layne

  2. Because... by WithLove · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Why would I want to watch a video on a screen I've been touching all day? This is a great idea, on several counts. Hands won't obstruct view of the screen while manipulating, greater accuracy, few fingerprints/scratches.

    Only con I can think of is being able to instantly touch a certain point. It'd seem like with the "touching" on the back that you'd need to touch somewhere first to get your orientation, then touch where you want to go.

    Beyond that, I think this would be very practical.

    1. Re:Because... by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You'd only need to orient yourself like that at first, while getting used to the device. With experience I figure it would be reasonable to gain a strong grasp of the spacing. While the tactile feedback in most devices limit what I can compare too, the Nintendo DS seems apt. During many DS games I don't want to take my eyes off of the top screen, while having to tap various parts of the bottom screen. With time this became natural. I expect the device in the article will be similar in this respect.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    2. Re:Because... by WithLove · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But the point is that with a DS you can see what you are "touching".

      I understand what you're saying about the fact that eventually you can just "know" where different points are on the control scheme, and I guess that's true to an extent. I just think that with most handheld devices, you need a fairly accurate touch. Lots of DS games just require that you press in the general direction of your intention (Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass comes to mind). But selecting choices from a menu with a control scheme is quite different, you need a very precise touch.

  3. Good idea but... by jimboindeutchland · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While this looks like a great idea and all, I can't help but wonder how this will translate into smaller mobile devices. Something thie size of the iPhone (just to pick a random example ;) doesn't really have space for two hands. If you pick up your own mobile phone and drag your fingers around the back of it, you'll find it a bit more cumbersome than holding your phone in the palm of your hand and touching the front of the device.

    That said, this could be an important development for tablet PC's. From my perspective, it seems tablets suffer from a lack of keyboard input. Sure you can plug in a keyboard, but that kinda defeats the purpose. This looks like it could be the solution to that problem.

    Go these guys!

    --
    this post is now diamonds!
  4. typing by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK, I was thinking, "yeah, so what" until they got to the part where they type on the keyboard. You could seriously type on that thing as fast as on a regular keyboard, because of the way they laid it out. Hold it and type at the same time.

    But the webcam on the back is great. I love it. It's like headgear for handhelds. Want to be the master of geekiness? Look no further my friend: the handheld that neither fits in your hand NOR your pocket! Useless you say? Yes, but it's cool!!

    --
    Qxe4
  5. Re:If the front and back.. by _xeno_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On that note, how do you hold it when you are actively using it? Telekineticly hover it between your hands so that they aren't touching? Or more realistically, very carefully balance it on your thumbs? I can't come up with a way to hold the thing as demonstrated in the video without a stand or something - which doesn't make it very portable.

    At some point if this is intended to be used with mobile devices, one of the hands is going to have to become dedicated to holding the thing while the other does the gestures.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  6. MS still copying apple by vlad30 · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    1. Re:MS still copying apple by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So basically let's bash Toshiba and Microsoft from trying to make an actual implementation of some obvious vagueness Apple patented.
      The basic idea is so obvious, even I came up with it few times when holding a touchscreen portable ("hmmm if the touch was on the back, I could hold it better").

      They should come up with some stronger word than "bias" to describe the typical anti-MS slashdot post. I bet my money that you wouldn't spin it like this if Toshiba worked on this alone. Pathetic.

    2. Re:MS still copying apple by wjsteele · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, there is a big difference between the two. The Apple device simply implements the touch surface on the back of the computer. The Microsoft device does it on both sides AND, most importantly, has the ability to track the location of the fingers on the back and display them on the front, so the user get's good feedback as to where his fingers are actually in relation to the device.

      The Apple device doesn't do anything like that.

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    3. Re:MS still copying apple by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Informative
      According to Mitsubishi's page on this project:
      • "As a two-sided touch screen, the LucidTouch is a direct extension of our two-sided touch table, published previously as Under the Table Interaction (reference below).
        ...[snip]...
        Publications:
        Wigdor, D.; Leigh, D.; Forlines, C.; Shipman, S.; Barnwell, J.; Balakrishnan, R.; Shen, C., "Under the Table Interaction", ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), ISBN: 1-59593-313-1, pp. 259-268, October 2006 (ACM Press, TR2006-076)"
      Microsoft's multitouch table (which has been in development for years) was covered on Slashdot. The "under the table" paper was published in October 2006. The Apple patent you linked to has a filing date of January 5, 2007.

      So is Apple copying Microsoft? Of course not. A table is not an iPod/phone is not a see-through tablet. As another replier mentioned, there's an obviousness about this "behind the screen" interaction. However, Apple fanboys (I'm not calling you one) like to think everybody's copying Apple.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  7. Don't know how they'll get it to be a slim device by Romancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It corrently works by having a camera sitting behind it and viewing the fingers as they move. If they build the camera into the device it would have to have a very wide angle and be able to distinguish between the fingers and the background.

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  8. Re:Apple patent by msimm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually if you watch the video the demonstrator explains that the camera method is interim, claiming technological limitations. I think this technology would catch on pretty quickly considering we are pretty used to using our hands (..) to manipulate our environment. Watching it makes one think about how inefficient tactile, one-sided input is while your hands essentially fumble around at the back of the device.

    I don't know about the Apple patent but I'd be happy to see a technology like this make it into handheld devices where screen space is limited and dragging hands or fingers constantly over your workspace is less then optimal.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  9. Palms man,, by msimm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They are about 1/2 the length of your hand and useless for tapping data (aside from maybe squeeze). I find myself holding just about anything two handed and I drum my fingers or generally move them around idly. This would let you grip the device while interacting comfortably. But it used a front and rear touch system, so if it did become troubling you could use your thumbs on the front or just one hand it when appropriate and problem solved. I think this a good thing and it should be very intuitive and very flexible. Apple's certainly started the ball rolling.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  10. Re:Mod parent down. Well-known religious bigot. by bombastinator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    0 to godwin's law in .5 sec. I do so wish that was a record but sadly, no.

  11. This looks promising by black_lbi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Accordion Hero anyone?

  12. Interesting idea but... by squoozer · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's an interesting idea there is no doubt about that. I really liked the map browsing right up to the point where I noticed the zooming in action looked a lot like he was trying to reproduce goatse with the map. The device will never been the same for me.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  13. Re:Mod parent down. Well-known religious bigot. by roguetrick · · Score: 2, Funny

    Haha, Sceintology.

    --
    -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
  14. Re:Mod parent down. Well-known religious bigot. by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, and apparently I'm well-known and a leader now! I did not receive that memo yet. The raise will be nice once the Marcabs finally get caught up on my back-pay.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  15. Re:Mod parent down. Well-known religious bigot. by ukemike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gee I thought the idea was to moderate the post not the author of the post.

    --
    -- QED
  16. Re:Mod parent down. Well-known religious bigot. by Asztal_ · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought Slashdot had a tradition of welcoming evil overlords.