Slashdot Mirror


IU's Choice of Search Engine ChaCha "Explained"

theodp sends a follow-up to the discussion here a couple of months back about Indiana University librarians and students being forced to use the 'human-powered' ChaCha search engine because IU's President and one of its Trustees were business buddies of ChaCha CEO (and IU alum) Scott Jones. Don't be ridiculous, insisted indignant IU officials. It was ChaCha's ability to fill in gaps in a speech he was writing in 2007 that convinced IU's CIO that the University had to do a deal with ChaCha. What a coincidence, notes Valleywag. The need to fill in gaps in a speech he was writing back in 2005 is what convinced ChaCha CEO Jones that he had to create ChaCha in the first place. Way to anticipate what your customers need before they do.

94 comments

  1. "Way to anticipate what your customers need" by hxnwix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Way to add distracting snark. Face it, you're not John Stewart.

    1. Re:"Way to anticipate what your customers need" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:"Way to anticipate what your customers need" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it that time of the month? Woke up on the wrong side of the bed? Why the PMS?

    3. Re:"Way to anticipate what your customers need" by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Way to add distracting snark. Face it, you're not John Stewart."

      Well, to be fair, Jon Stewart's not even John Stewart!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:"Way to anticipate what your customers need" by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Joke's on you -- you probably only caught that mistake because of the amazing power of ChaCha.

    5. Re:"Way to anticipate what your customers need" by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I was wondering why OP was talking about the Green Lantern.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  2. Gaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have some gaps in my brain. Will it fill in those too?

    1. Re:Gaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, For once a Goatse troll is almost funny...
      He said "gap" heh heh heh

    2. Re:Gaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That gap's filled with with Ca Ca ... uh ... Cha Cha.

  3. what's the suprise? by tfiedler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is this kind of behavior a suprise to anyone? It happens in every business, big or small, for profit and non-profit, and today, colleges are nothing more than big businesses driven by athletics. Its typical hypocricy, all the while the executives spout off about ethics they openly ignore them. The moral of this is to never believe a thing that rolls downhill, whether from executives, politicians, rock stars or otherwise; and instead to remember that the basic truth is that the importance of adherence to lofty ethics for the most part, is dependent upon who you are.

    --
    Democrats and Republicans are like AIDS and Cancer, I want neither!
    1. Re:what's the suprise? by DaleGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't get this kind of post. It seems to be saying "big deal, everybody does that, why did this even get posted?"

      While I'm not surprised at all this sort of thing happens this IMO doesn't mean it shouldn't be reported on. Maybe then it'll happen a bit less often.

    2. Re:what's the suprise? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I don't think it is just about businesses and organizations. Possibly everyone does it. It's all part of social networking, we all get and grant favors to people we know that we wouldn't grant to people we don't know, even if it's for favors that shouldn't be granted.

    3. Re:what's the suprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moral of this is to never believe a thing that rolls downhill, whether from executives, politicians, rock stars or otherwise; and instead to remember that the basic truth is that the importance of adherence to lofty ethics for the most part, is dependent upon who you are.
      Adherence to ethics depends on how much it inconveniences you. Doesn't matter if you're at the top or the bottom, people will violate ethics to please their friends or just make their own lives easier. Execs will give friends big contracts, burger flippers will give their friends a free order of fries
    4. Re:what's the suprise? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      There's no surprise involved. Cockroaches don't like light, and the internet is a great way to shine it on them.

    5. Re:what's the suprise? by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      There's no surprise involved. Cockroaches don't like light, and the internet is a great way to shine it on them. Although in this case the light is a spotlight of free publicity. I've never even heard of Cha Cha and I went and checked them out just for grins because of this article.

      Also to comment on this 'new' type of search engine: A people driven search engine already exists, StumbleOn. I use it all the time to get more intelligent searches.
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  4. What the ... ? by khasim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He was impressed when IU's Ask a Librarian service found the quote, from former Harvard President James Bryant Conant, within hours. But a ChaCha guide got it in two minutes.

    "Hours".

    So he wasted at least TWO HOURS of someone's time looking up a quote? For a SPEECH? And then he asked a DIFFERENT person to look it up, also?
    1. Re:What the ... ? by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Informative

      Welcome to the world of the modern CEO (which the president of a university effectively is). Other's time is worth nothing compared to your time - both figuratively and nearly literally for some CEOs. Sadly, it probably wasn't even a good speech - they rarely are.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:What the ... ? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      I guess the guy in ChaCha used Google and the others were too dumb to do that.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    3. Re:What the ... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two hours was how long it took the response to get back to him via e-mail...you really think someone spent the entire span of that time looking for the quote?

    4. Re:What the ... ? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      He was impressed when IU's Ask a Librarian service found the quote, from former Harvard President James Bryant Conant, within hours. So he wasted at least TWO HOURS of someone's time looking up a quote? I'm replying to your post two hours after you made it. Even though I'm responding "within hours", do you think I spent two hours writing this?
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  5. What!? by KEnderK · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought ChaCha's only reason to exist was so you could abuse the people who help you search!

  6. Conflict of Interest by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I cannot see any way that someone could make a defensible argument for a University forcing its students to use a particular search engine. It's just braindead. When the person making the decision is a director of (or anyone with a significant stake in) the company benefitting, it goes beyond being stupid and irresponsible and becomes corrupt.

    How does IU pull this off, anyway? Do they actually block Google, Yahoo, etc?

    1. Re:Conflict of Interest by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just a guess: If you currently do a search at the University of Indiana, the results are Powered by Google Search Appliance. Sounds like they'll switch to ChaCha for intranet searching.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Conflict of Interest by Loadmaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, when you search there are a few different engines listed with radio buttons to choose. ChaCha is selected by default. Google is right next to it.

    3. Re:Conflict of Interest by coolate · · Score: 5, Informative

      I work At IU, it is actually just replacing the search engine on the site www.iu.edu, it was/is google. No one is being forced at all to use it, in fact most users have google for their homepage. Now they can use a special version of cha cha on the IU homepage that is supported by the Library staff and lab consultants. It will also give special access to the library's periodicals and other online documents if a student is logged in. To be honest I think they will still be using google hardware for some searches.

    4. Re:Conflict of Interest by xigxag · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mod parent up. This is just IU using Chacha to power its own internal search portal, and forcing its employees to be unpaid volunteers for Chacha. Nobody's stopping students from using GOOG or anything else for their general web searches. RTFPR for more info.

      I still think it's boneheaded and a conflict of interest, but let's not exaggerate it into something it's not. Oh wait, this is Slashdot, never mind.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    5. Re:Conflict of Interest by wicka · · Score: 1

      They aren't forcing anyone to use anything. IU's system currently uses Google as its main search engine; on IU OneStart there options for both ChaCha and Google. Before, Google was the default. Now, ChaCha is the default. You can click a box and change it if you want. The point is that IU thinks ChaCha will search better, and I don't know about that, but it can't search any worse than Google was. I don't know if it was the type of information on IU pages or what, but Google never found anything I wanted. More often than not it was better just to look through the main IU directory/index page.

    6. Re:Conflict of Interest by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      You say its boneheaded and a conflict of interest but dont want people to exaggerate it into something its not, you yourself are underexaggerating the case. IU gets public money and as a result of the deal with ChaCha, is essentially funding ChaCha like its a university program. Its a definite conflict of interest and the IU administrator involved should be fired and probably needs to be taken to court over this. I know thats how search engines typically start out, but it doesn't make it right or acceptable.

      Cheers.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    7. Re:Conflict of Interest by xigxag · · Score: 1

      Huh? Which part of my post are you supposed to be disagreeing with? I'm saying it's misleading and exaggerated to claim, as the writeup does, that IU students are being forced to use Chacha. As you correctly point out, there's plenty else wrong with what IU is doing without making stuff up.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    8. Re:Conflict of Interest by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      When large organizations implement a search engine, it's not the same as the search window in your browser. This type of project isn't about what runs on client computers for general www searches, it's about searches within Indiana University, and not just material that's already had links written to www.iu.edu. This will increase what's available to Google searches of IU, at least for IU students. The article is a joke.

      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    9. Re:Conflict of Interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as "google hardware". There are results provide by the google software search engine. Cha-Cha is actually using the google search engine results, just scraping off the identifying stuff and serving them up.

  7. forced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How were they forced? There are so many search engines out there, it's hard to imagine blocking *all* of them and *all* the proxies you could use to get to them.

    TFA doesn't explain. Something doesn't add up.

  8. Re:Hmm. by KEnderK · · Score: 1

    It's still there buddy.

  9. ChaCha search engine is creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always observing your bathroom breaks and reporting them to third parties behind your back.

    1. Re:ChaCha search engine is creepy by deftones_325 · · Score: 0

      and what's with the hiding in the bushes and digging through your garbage? Maybe they should name it "Ex-girlfriend"

      --
      "A gentleman never strikes a lady with his hat on." - Fred Allen
  10. All the silly names made me laugh by tjstork · · Score: 1

    I just looked at the article, and I honestly couldn't get past the Cha Cha part. I mean, who seriously make anything called "Cha Cha" that isn't some sort of dog food or diapers for crippled canines. They should fire that guy just for doing that, even if he didn't own a piece of it.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:All the silly names made me laugh by Scutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, why name it something moronic like "Cha Cha" when you could name it something sophisticated and professional like "Yahoo!" or "Google".

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    2. Re:All the silly names made me laugh by 3vi1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't see what's so silly about it. My friend Joanie loves Cha Cha.

      Thank god for Google - I had no idea how to spell Joanie.

      -J

    3. Re:All the silly names made me laugh by UltimateRobotLover · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least they didn't call it Hoo Hoo Dilly!

    4. Re:All the silly names made me laugh by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Dogpile and AskJeeves (isn't that vaguely languagecist (yeah, just made that word up, live with it)?).

      Internet search engines have weird names...

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    5. Re:All the silly names made me laugh by Traxton1 · · Score: 1

      Well, according to their website, Cha is Chinese for "search." So unlike, say, Google or Yahoo!, the word has relevance to searching.

      I think the best part is that ChaCha uses Google ads on its results page.

  11. That's the point. The waste. by khasim · · Score: 2, Informative

    This guy is so bad that he wastes HOURS of other people's time on researching his speech.

    So that would immediately call into question any of his decisions. He is not capable of determining whether ChaCha is better than Google (or better than just looking it up in the library yourself).

    Obligatory car analogy -
    If you never drive a car, are you capable of saying Car A is better than Car B based solely upon how fast someone else can pick up your laundry in it?

    1. Re:That's the point. The waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, uh... yeah. You're obviously one of those people who figures that the CEO doesn't actually do anything, and you could just as easily step in and take over and probably do it better, even though you have no conception of what it is. You guys are cute like that.

    2. Re:That's the point. The waste. by mikael · · Score: 1

      This guy is so bad that he wastes HOURS of other people's time on researching his speech.

      That depends how much he is paying them - if someone were to pay me $100/hour to look up cheesy phrases for their speech, I'd be quite happy to do it. If they're paying less than $4/hour, on the other hand, I'd prefer to be looking up the cheesy menu for Extra Large McBurgers.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:That's the point. The waste. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      So what? How many CEOs figure they could just as easily step right in and teach the engineers how to get things done, and probably do it better, if they could just take the time from their ever so much more important duties? This even though they have no idea how a light bulb works?

      There are thousands of CEOs who do don't do anything, or at least, don't do anything beneficial for the organizations they nominally lead. That's obvious enough to anyone, given the present state of corporate America. In fact, given how fundamentally self-serving and dishonest (not to mention incompetent) many of these individuals are, I suspect that a decent engineer could step in and take over, with perhaps a modicum of management training. That's not to say he'd do a good job, no sir ... but he probably couldn't do much worse.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:That's the point. The waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're obviously one of those people who figures that the CEO doesn't actually do anything, and you could just as easily step in and take over and probably do it better, even though you have no conception of what it is. That describes a majority of CEOs precisely. Many fell into their positions through luck or timing. There's no difference between you or them other than right place, right time, and you weren't.
    5. Re:That's the point. The waste. by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Flipping burgers pays that bad in USA ? I was thinking you guys have minimum-wage laws at around $10 ? Granted, even that is hardly enough for a reasonable standard of living, even with a fulltime job, but oh well.

      Flipping burgers in Stavanger pays ~$15-20/hour.

    6. Re:That's the point. The waste. by zeropointburn · · Score: 1

      U.S. minimum wage is $5.85, unless you're wait-staff. This is due to a July '07 increase; for the past several years it was $5.15.

      Besides, if the CEO is paying someone $100/hr to research speeches, he's not paying her to research speeches... unless you consider 'research' to be equal to 'fellatio'.

      Seriously, is there anyone in the states that can actually handle a little power without completely losing it? Granted, bad news is the best news, but you never hear about the guy that runs his company/organization responsibly, obeys the law and general morality, and doesn't screw a whole bunch of people, whether literally or figuratively? (bachelors excepted on the literal screwing, of course.) The worst part in this case is that it's a college that's getting screwed with. Education is critical, yet it's subject to some of the worst parts of both corporate and governmental corruption, massive administration bloat, micro-managing, and infighting. It's almost a miracle that anyone comes out of it as a productive human.

      disclaimers: I live in the U.S. This post not intended to imply doubt of our grand overlord bush. No terroristic, subversive, or dissenting opinions intended or implied. fnordDo not read. Discard unused portion, do not store. All hail Eris Discordia.

      --
      -1 raving lunatic; +6 subGenius... Things even out...
    7. Re:That's the point. The waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah what a moron. He shouldn't do any research for a speech. That works for slashdot, why shouldn't it work everywhere?

    8. Re:That's the point. The waste. by Eivind · · Score: 1

      That low ? $5.85/hour means that if you work 8hr/day, 22 days a month that's aproximately how many workdays there are a month, on average, your gross earnings will be $1000 dollars. That's -gross- mind you, I don't know what the net will be, but it'll be less.

      Can you actually live for that in the USA today ? Is it enough to cover even the basics reasonably ? What's the sense of a minimum wage that doesn't even permit a person to become independent ?

    9. Re:That's the point. The waste. by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      Flipping burgers in Stavanger pays ~$15-20/hour.

      There are probably locales in the U.S. that pay about that, other factors taken into consideration. I'm sure there are some places that pay minimum wage, but they probably can't attract workers. The last time I was in a "minimum wage"-type industry (pizza parlor in the 90s), our starting pay was always 1 or 2 dollars per hour above the minimum wage. Even then, we couldn't keep people at that wage - it was just too easy for them to find another job for a little more. The minimum wage didn't go up for a long time because it didn't have to go up.

      And you're right, anything near the minimum wage is not a reasonable standard for raising a family, or even keeping one's self comfortable. That's why you rarely see family men flipping burgers for any length of time. Sometimes you will see them do it for extra money, or to get rolling again after a job loss. But usually, it's teens and young people making money to buy... whatever they buy - video games, skate boards, etc. They don't make minimum wage to pay for a mortgage, though.

    10. Re:That's the point. The waste. by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      You forgot nepotism.

      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    11. Re:That's the point. The waste. by mikael · · Score: 1

      This discussion comes up every now again on Slashdot, especially when comparing the cost of living between the West Coast (Seattle, Los Angeles), the East Coast (New York, Boston, Washington D.C), the South/Central (Dallas, Austin) and everywhere else.

      Minimum wage is about $12,000 year.

      About a third goes on taxes. Another third will probably go on rent (sharing a two bedroom flat would be around $325/month)
      That leaves you with around $4000

      A car would cost the second hand car price + licensing/smog tests + gas ($1000 + $300 + $1 every 30 miles).
      Unless you are in a city and can take public transit. Then that would cost you a monthly pass.
      That's another $1200

      Now, a single person's food bill is probably around $35/week, or around $1800/year

      But clothing/electricity/water bills would probably take up the rest.

      You could probably break even, but not save anything. As they say, welcome to renter's hell.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    12. Re:That's the point. The waste. by zeropointburn · · Score: 1


      $5.85/hr for 40hrs/wk (which a lot of people are lucky to get; most places cut you off at 36) is $234/wk, $936/mo, $12,168/yr. Taxes are about 15% at that wage, so you're looking at $10k per year. Nobody really lives on that; it's minimal survival, especially for a 'first-world' country. Housing and food costs vary wildly, but you can expect to pay about 80% of your after-tax income on basic needs (shelter, food, cheap clothes, electricity). Note that this doesn't include medical insurance, car insurance, gas, or any form of entertainment. Offering credit to someone in this situation is almost criminal, because it's quite likely they won't be able to keep up with it. One bounced check, late payment, or short paycheck, and they're screwed more thoroughly than a porn star; the fees and interest quickly outstrip their available income.
      Construction and manual labor is more like $8-$10/hr, more for trades like pipefitters, electricians, etc.
      A white-collar service job might net you $9-$15/hr. Specialists could see $25/hr or more, after 4+ additional years of training and certification, plus relevant experience.
      Basically, unless you put yourself into nearly lifelong debt for a degree (and manage to choose a good one), you're capped at about three times the poverty level unless you get a decade of experience or move into management/business ownership. Any opportunity beyond $12-$13/hr is pretty rare, and either physically or mentally punishing. (major exceptions are administration and government/military contract work) Another thing to consider is that once you move past $20k/yr, your taxes rise from 15% up to around 22%. Additionally, locations with moderate to high pay rates have correspondingly high costs of living. There are cities in the US where a McDonald's employee makes over $10/hr to start; unfortunately, almost everything is 2-2.5x more expensive, which leaves them worse off once increased taxes are factored in.

      For more economic details, have a look at the census bureau, http://www.census.gov/. Latest data is from 2000.
      If you want to know more about our tax system, have a look at the ever-dreaded IRS here: http://www.irs.gov/.

      --
      -1 raving lunatic; +6 subGenius... Things even out...
    13. Re:That's the point. The waste. by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Thank you. +1 Informative.

      It's interesting to compare. One thing that strikes me is, in general people say USA have low taxation, whereas for example Norway has high taxes.

      But that completely fails to be the case for the lower classes, infact the oposite is true. With a gross-income of $12K in Norway, you would literally pay zero taxes. Not only that: Those zero taxes include full medical-insurance, so the real difference is larger than 15% (how much would medical insurance cost for a person earning $1000/month in the USA, aproximately?) I actually think you'd qualify for welfare at $12K/year gross, the minimum tends to be on the order of $1500/month, it varies somewhat based on where you live since costs of living differ in Norway too. (particularily housing varies wildly, other stuff is more constant)

      There's no general minimum wage in Norway, it's just that you plain don't -GET- anyone if you're offering less than about $15/hour. Unemployment is at less than 2%, and in many areas there's more open jobs than there are unemployed people. Add in that perhaps half the "unemployed" are in reality unable or unwilling to work, and you see that employers have no choice but to be competitive if they want to hire anyone at all. You're free to advertise a job at $3/hour. Just don't expect anyone to apply for it.

      The strange thing is, the average income in USA is almost as high as the average in Norway, still all the salary-levels you mention sound wildly low to me. As in a factor of 2-3 low. The explanation, offcourse, is that in USA the top 1% and top 10% get a MUCH larger portion of the total than here.

  12. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The search box on http://www.iu.edu/ answers with a "Powered by Google Search Appliance", no Cha-Cha ;-(

  13. Ah-ha! by mooreti1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was wondering where Jeeve's went after leaving Ask. Apparently he changed his freakin' name to ChaCha.

    --
    Oh, for the days when sig's didn't have to be cute...hey, wait a sec.
  14. Diarrhea, CHA-CHA-cha! Diarrhea, CHA-CHA-cha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cha-Cha is the sound of diarrhea. Indiana is gay for naming their search engine so gayly.

  15. Missed the real story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indiana still has "libraries"

  16. Snark? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    That was "sarcasm". Look it up.

    You might also want to look up the real meaning of "snark" while you're at it.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Snark? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      I did look it up. 'Speech or writing loosely characterized as "snidely derisive."' That's what it was.

      And while a sufficiently permissive definition of "sarcasm" might include that statement, it really was nothing remotely like good sarcasm.

  17. They're so helpful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.somethingawful.com/d/comedy-goldmine/chachacom-get-people.php?page=10

            HatfulOfHollow posted:

            Status: Looking for a guide ...
            Status: Connected to guide: BarbaraB
            BarbaraB: Hi there. I will be helping with your search.
            You: hello brabarab!
            BarbaraB: HI! What can I find you today?
            You: i need information about bank robberies
            BarbaraB: general info?
            You: yes
            You: but also some more specific stuff
            BarbaraB: Like what?
            You: like great bank robberies or robberies in general
            You: where the criminals got away
            You: oh thats a good link
            You: but is there any more speciic information about any of those particular robberies?
            You: yes! bank robberies unsolved!
            You: that's amazing
            BarbaraB: Can I find anything else for you?
            You: how about robberies of bank robberies gone wrong?
            You: err links for robberies gone wrong
            BarbaraB: sure, one moment
            You: like remember that one in california a few years ago where the guys had body armor on and got killed?
            You: i need more info about things like that.
            You: oh wow, that last link is awesome
            You: it even goes into the details of what the peeople did when they robbed the banks
            BarbaraB: Interesting....
            You: this is all great info
            You: oh man!
            You: i like that last one. philly's greatest bank robbery
            BarbaraB: Can I find anything else for you?
            You: yeah, actually
            BarbaraB: Let me have it......
            You: can you find me the addresses of banks in philadelphia.
            BarbaraB: LOL
            You: no, really.
            BarbaraB: No really, LOL.
            You: i'm just trying to learn through other peoples mistakes
            BarbaraB: Can I find anything else for you?
            You: nope that's it!
            BarbaraB: Thanks for searching ChaCha!

  18. Driven by athletics? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I agree they are no different then any other buisness, but athletics? I dont see that being the case.

    Sure its a factor from a marketing perspective, but i dont see it being the big money maker for them. Its number of students that makes the $. Many schools where their athletic programs are nil still rake in the students/profits.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  19. clock is running -- Can SlashCha beat ChaCha? by notshannon · · Score: 1

    on a ChaCha query ... 5 minutes so far ...

    qalqashandi sub al-a'sha manuscript location

    1. Re:clock is running -- Can SlashCha beat ChaCha? by notshannon · · Score: 2

      15 minutes -- "Chat session ended" -- zero search results
      on qalqashandi sub al-a'sha manuscript location

      Cairo, Egypt would be a good start.
      (If you know what library, please reply; thanks!)

    2. Re:clock is running -- Can SlashCha beat ChaCha? by Lesrahpem · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure you spelled it wrong. I'm pretty sure that it's spelled Subh Al-a'sha and is written by Qalqashanda. When looking for something like that spelling matters.

    3. Re:clock is running -- Can SlashCha beat ChaCha? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1

      Cairo, Egypt would be a good start.
      (If you know what library, please reply; thanks!)

      It's at the Dar al-Kutub al-Misriyyah, which looks like this.

      /. FTW!

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  20. MOD PAReNT UP!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent to the sky, good people, mod parent to the sky.

  21. twilight zone by Digitus1337 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I ran a search for "serving ferrets", when asked if I needed feeding them, I responded with "not so much" and had my session ended by the ChaCha Guide almost instantly.

    1. Re:twilight zone by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      I remember listening to a friend's comedy CD, I think it was Howard Stern, and the guy on it was making a prank call to a car-cleaning place, and he was asking questions like:

      "Okay, now, do you guys clean the whole car? Like in the trunk and everything?"

      "And can you get out really bad stains, like blood? Cause the trunk is an absolute mess in there."

      "And now, you guys don't ask a bunch of invasive questions, right?"

      And the woman seemed to be going along fine with it :-)

    2. Re:twilight zone by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Tom Mabe http://www.tommabe.com/
      He has a couple cds of pranking telemarketers. I know he has one call about a rug cleaning company and him asking about getting blood out of the carpet.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    3. Re:twilight zone by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think that's it. I do remember initially thinking it was Howard Stern. Also, it was so funny I was laughing uncontrollably for a few minutes.

      Thanks for the name and link :-)

  22. Our leaders ... no wonder the worlds so f'd up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a bunch of evil scumbags

    so much for capitalism or free enterprise

  23. What? Are other Search Engines BLOCKED?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you mean "forced"?

    Do you mean to suggest that IU students cannot access other search engines?

    I know it happens in Australia (land of the dreaded monopoly-telco Telstra),
    but, surely, in a civilised uni, one should be free to use any Search Engine!

    Maybe IU [& other US universities] need[s] Psiphon...? :-/

  24. It's a blatant conflict of interest by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    McRobbie should have been eliminated from his assension to IU president, which happens on Oct 18, for tepid ethics.

    Whatever the quality of ChaCha, it's not right for him to be on their board, then use IU student resources as well as IU assets to forward this. Jones, inventor of voice mail, needs no free ride from anyone.

    Indiana politics smells as bad as politics anywhere, but this is far too close of a relationship, and McRobbie sees nothing wrong with his forceful advocacy of ChaCha. Sure, you can use google or anything you want. But using university resources towards personal profit in this way is onerous and not transparent.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    1. Re:It's a blatant conflict of interest by googlehistorian · · Score: 1

      Tepid ethics are the domain of those who ignore the facts. 1) McRobbie was NEVER compensated with cash or equity from ChaCha. EVER. 2) McRobbie was NEVER on ChaCha's board when he was simultaneously IU's President. 3) Even if McRobbie had been on ChaCha's board, how is it any different than Stanford's President, John Hennessy, sitting on Google's board (and other boards) and profiting wildly? http://www.signallake.com/innovation/Hennessy022407.pdf For those who are hot and bothered about McRobbie/IU/ChaCha, you might notice significantly more rampant corruption involving real facts related to Google/Stanford/Hennessy, etc.... 4) IU students and faculty do not have ANY restriction from using Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, ChaCha, or any other search engine of their choosing. There is no blocking whatsoever. 5) IU appears to be leveraging ChaCha as a new technology of connecting its knowledge workers, who are paid by IU anyway, to their users/customers so that their users get more value out of the IU staff (librarians and IT support staff) for which they are already paying. Many posters here seem to have missed the point or ignored the facts. 6) IU announced a strategic alliance to determine, with ChaCha, if there just *might* be something interesting about combining human intelligence with the best that the Web and university resources offer. Isn't that why we have universities? i.e. to research new and different approaches that may or may not work.

    2. Re:It's a blatant conflict of interest by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      You're entitled to your opinions. Not your facts.

      1) McRobbie was indeed compensated; you think he did ChaCha for free?
      2) Of course not; he's not President until Oct 18th. Nah, just another university official (as interim) doing the wrong thing
      3) Two wrongs don't make a right. Look at how much Stanford has sucked down both private and federal funds. The articles over the years stagger the mind, of just how much Stanford can be as a black hole for cash-- in the name of 'development'.
      4) That's what I said and implied.
      5) Mmmmm KnowledgeWorkers. There's a nice buzzword for you. The phrase "paid by IU anyway" is what's at issue here.
      6) How often do you find it necessary to rationalize unethical choices? Certainly, universities are supposed to endeavor research and be clever about it. Your catch-all "isn't that why we have universities?" is a droll method to justify unethical business relationships where university officials are in the pocket (personally, financially) of a private organization run by a famous local (to Indiana) VC.

      Horrid profiteering (yes, I'm a capitalist) by any university official in this manner is unethical. Rationalizing his choices makes them no better.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    3. Re:It's a blatant conflict of interest by googlehistorian · · Score: 1

      I would be ever so happy to place a (LARGE) monetary wager with you about "opinion" #1. (We could resolve the dispute via factual documents made available by ChaCha and, btw, it is in the absence of any substantive proof from you whatsoever that he was compensated in any way. Further, both ChaCha and IU have factually stated that he was definitively not compensated) And re #2, you really must be a dimwit if you don't know the difference between "taking office" (with full authority) and having an "inauguration ceremony". And the rest of your comments are simply dribble, especially given that you are so far off base on the main points.

    4. Re:It's a blatant conflict of interest by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Good.

      Now, let's get an audit for full exposure and transparency. Then let's recind this relationship so as to for once and all remove all possible taints, and use an arms-length method to employ this dictum on IU's campuses.

      1) I don't believe IU, and this quid pro quo relationship has to end if it's to be transparent. Let Scot Jones get his own money and good will to make the endeavor work. Using IU resources to benefit Scot Jones is much like building a stadium for Jim Irsay with tax dollars. Oh, wait....

      2) McRobbie's assension becomes complete on inauguration. There've been plenty of solid IU presidents, some with better records on various issues than others. Now it's McRobbie's turn to show that he can be transparent in these relationships, and while inviting research and perhaps using research to further the academic goals of the institution, be also capable of maintaining an arms-length distance-- and remove the heavy hand of this policy.

      If desired transparency is drool, then I dribble. Perhaps you were thinking of 'drivel'.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    5. Re:It's a blatant conflict of interest by googlehistorian · · Score: 1

      Very unfortunate that your vocabulary doesn't translate into useful intelligence. But excellent that you memorized your dictionary. Two gold stars for you! It probably allows you to dispatch more than one condescending comment every single day. How else could you look in the mirror without feeling just a little better than the other guy? How nice that you can spew your negativity in so many different flavors!

      Too bad that society doesn't reward your particular skills better. If they did, you likely wouldn't be throwing so many (ill-informed) stones from the sidelines. It's people like you that waste everyone's time with unsupported innuendo, as if you could possibly know something legitimate. You're on the outside, powerless, hence the screaming. You have not an ounce of evidence. Not even a shred. Why? Because it simply doesn't exist. Rather, libel and slander are your lazy shortcuts to some other agenda--perhaps to simply prop up your self-esteem or to malign those that make you envious. Or perhaps you are simply paranoid and you subscribe to various other conspiracy theories too? Oh, you're protecting the little guy? Doubt it.

      Leaders like Jones, McRobbie and Irsay work hard to make the world a better place. And they prove it day in and day out.

      Get a life.

  25. the hidden agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect it is not just about business relationships, if you have direct access to student search history you can aggregate a great deal of intellectual property before anyone else. You could even patent an invention or move on an idea before the students themselves, for example.

  26. 1. Exploit your workforce 2. Screw your users by bluenovadesign · · Score: 1

    What else would you expect from a company which pays a pittance to its employees (only they aren't of course, otherwise it would no doubt break a few labout laws). From a quick look round the net being a guide for Cha Cha appears to be a job which requires skill, pays you only when questions are asked (so you can be sitting about idle and unpaid), and even then only pays at a rate below just about any western minimum wage. If these guides were sitting at home waiting for deliveries of buttons to sew for a few pence a time there would be a documentary being made about how evil their bosses are. How dumb (or desperate) are people to be cha cha guides? Much of the internet relies on people gifting their services (e.g. the advice available on this site and forums throughout the net) for a variety of reasons (they like to help, they know they'll get advice/help in return later). Cha Cha is taking that positive environment and trying to extract a profit from other people's goodwill. Many of the guides probably enjoy giving advice and would be doing something similar on other sites so a few beans in payment seems like a good deal. But do we really want to go down this road? Some people are always looking to extract money from the work of others - do the right thing and ignore Cha Cha!

  27. Re:1. Exploit your workforce 2. Screw your users by Fortimir · · Score: 1

    Look at being a guide as something you do for a couple hours at night before you go to bed instead of a job. You can make a few hundred dollars a month just being on the computer doing what you normally would otherwise.

    I would say BIAS alert, since my mother was a lawyer responsible for the startup of ChaCha and she actually showed it to me when it was in venture capital mode and you needed a password to access it... but I guess my statement really has nothing to do with any of that.

    --
    I live in a place where those who live forever come to die.
  28. A fact about McRobbie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    McRobbie has no equity or compensation from ChaCha, and never did. ChaCha is simply enhancing what IU has already been doing for years - providing students with direct access to experts online. Pretty cool stuff.

  29. speaking of free publicity ... by gr8scot · · Score: 1

    The synopsis looked a little bit too ridiculous to believe, so I Googled "indiana university search engine". It looks possible that "the ChaCha infrastructure" is not entirely without merit. Other things being equal (that is, assuming that their IT department doesn't totally suck eggs), their press release gives the impression that information that has not yet been uploaded will become more quickly digitized, the next time each resource is requested. Of course, that's the description from the parties who have a vested interest in making it sound good. But it is apparent that electronic search capabilities have been augmented by, not replaced by, human librarian expertise. I hope the Union of

    How will this partnership benefit the IU academic community?
    Every time a guide answers a question, the answer will be added to the search system, building a base of knowledge from which others can draw. The ability to repurpose this accumulated knowledge extends what is currently available at Indiana University and offers a valuable new service to the academic community.


    www.indiana.edu/~ovpit/presentations/ChaCha/ChaCha_IU_FAQ_080607.doc

    If it seems to good to be true, it is.
    The converse is also true, with a few hilarious exceptions.

    --
    All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
  30. In MySpace... by Trogre · · Score: 1

    ... no one can hear you ChaChaCha.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  31. Here then.... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    Since you don't like my vocabulary and apparently are missing my message, let me take something from Scott Jones' own web site. I'll annotate. Viz:

    >> An Indianapolis technology business and Indiana University have announced a partnership.

    Ok, there's a partnership. See the next sentence.

    >> The partnership will use IU's library and information technology staff in a Carmel-based Internet search engine that uses experts as "guides" through techniques including instant messaging.

    Uh, let's see. IU's library and information technology staff.... and who is paying for this? Indianatax payers? Those with fealty to the bursars of IU? Guides cost money.

    >> When IU students and faculty use the service, IU guides will be vetting and voting upon the instant search results, constantly improving them. Guides will also available for information seekers' interaction via live chat.

    Nothing like letting people do research with IU guides to vet and vote. After all, librarians do that. And the IT staff do that... right?

    >> Scott A. Jones, founder of the ChaCha search engine, and Brad Wheeler, Indiana University vice president for information technology, made the announcement. Jones is the inventor of key parts of voice-mail technology.

    As ValleyWag and others cite, Wheeler works for McRobbie, or perhaps Dr Garland Elmore and McRobbie. Elmore would seem above this fray.

    >> The alliance is one of several partnerships Michael McRobbie, IU president, intends to make with Indiana-based businesses to promote economic and technological growth in the state.

    Alliances are great, and they are key. Good for McRobbie. Good for IU. Good for their students, who are supposed to be the primary beneficiaries.

    >> McRobbie resigned from the board of directors of ChaCha before taking office July 1. He resigned from that position when he was named IU president so as not to have any conflicts of interest, said Lauren Kinzler of Dittoe Public Relations.

    Ah, here's the truck I have with the entire matter. All of the aforementioned came when McRobbie, who very unlikely worked for ChaCha as a director for FREE, through his obvious and tacit approval didn't dismiss, or disapprove of this relationship between IU and ChaCha, and therefore it lacks transparency. To summarize my truck: he worked for ChaCha as a director, and then after becoming president-elect, quits ChaCha, and then this policy and university resources policy comes birthed from the ether.

    Not.

    I don't believe McRobbie was a direct beneficiary of a bribe, direct (W-2 or 1099) pay, stock asset value amplification scheme from Jones or any theory like that. Instead, there's a situation that looks very much like quid pro quo. McRobbie is a director of Jones' startup- ChaCha, resigns handily, and suddenly IU's using an unproven engine while utilizing university assets and resources backing it. Hmmmmm. We won't even look at other ChaCha directors becoming involved in IU's leadership.

    Powerless indeed. How presumptive. It leads me to believe that you believe yourself to be, or might actually be in a position of power at IU. If you are, then your defense of this abrogation of ethics as I see it demands openness and transparency that this matter does not have.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    1. Re:Here then.... by googlehistorian · · Score: 1

      Now, we're talking. Thank you for the increased clarity.

      Okay, what if it were true that McRobbie really didn't accept any compensation whatsoever from ChaCha? Would that change the color of the situation? And I really do mean NO COMPENSATION. If it were absolutely TRUE, would it factor into your thinking? BTW, public representations from both IU and ChaCha are that there has been no compensation to McRobbie ever.

      And IF this really were a research-oriented "strategic alliance" in the truest sense, where university and company-with-a-fresh-idea were genuinely trying to sort out the future of human-mediated search, would it be relevant that there was a mutual interest in forming a relationship that might expand the opportunities of both the university and said company? (It appears that such a model has worked quite well for MIT, Stanford, CMU, Rice, Caltech, etc etc) Might university, company, and constituents of Indiana ALL benefit from such an alliance? Think about jobs, learning opportunities for students, interesting collaborations for faculty, etc....

      Also, does it factor into your opinion that IU is not restricting any student or faculty member from using whatever general search engine is desired. Therefore, there is complete freedom for all IU constituents to use the search engine of their choice. And, yes, there is a default of an Indiana-based product as opposed to default of a California-based product. Who picked Google in that role before they were the clear market leader? Why? It certainly wouldn't be the first time that a local university collaborated with a local business for mutual best interests. This also maps into the Governor's "Buy Indiana" emphasis. Seems like a pretty worthy concept intended to provide a better future for Indiana constituents.

      For local site search (i.e. local IU content), IU is clearly adding librarian-mediated functionality that cannot be provided by Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, or any other current search engine on the market today. This functionality involves IU-paid employees who are offered ONLY to IU-affiliated users. Perhaps there has been confusion about that point. Assuming it were completely true, would it make the situation palatable?

      If (and understandably it is a big "if" for you) these things were true, would you find the relationship more acceptable?

    2. Re:Here then.... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      At best, it's a wicked procedural and PR gaffe. At worst, it's much worse than that.

      Vetting the situation requires, unfortunately for Jones and McRobbie, startling clarity and an ugly audit. Provided brilliant-- no, crystaline-- results, subsequent dicta needs to be fully transparent. The merest hint of personal gain on McRobbie's part at either taxpayer or student cost taints this and/or subsequent research endeavors. McRobbie makes a great if controversial salary in a time of fiscal difficulties in Indiana. The office deserves and warrants the salary paid for the efforts expended; I have no truck with competitive compensation.

      The gaffe here is the appearance of quid pro quo, and unwinding the missteps mandates openness and an audit to cleanse the dignities of all involved. Google with their 'do no harm' spin won a lot of friends for Brin, then Schmidt. Schmidt had his tenure from Sun and Novell and HP. Jones is otherwise a king among comparative Lilliputians. As the road to hell is paved with good intentions, clarity and obviousness are mandated in such roles as McRobbie's. Research endeavor suits many institutions, and within Indiana, others like Jischke didn't leave impressions of coopted intentions, yet Jischke benefited well from his services to Purdue, as an example in a local sense. He was successful in real terms, and his methods of developing partnerships had no seeming ethical taints. On the rare occasion when there were good questions, his openness evaporated any apparent constraint.

      Offering Yahoo, Google, Live Search, and other offerings is but a normal and largely free service for students, faculty, and allied employees of IU. Adding labor and assets above these to ChaCha, or the appearance of it, allies ChaCha's efforts, to ChaCha's ends specifically. Indiana taxpayers, students, parents assessing student situations, and so on, might look askance when a university official, a past immediate director of a for-profit entrepreneurial venture, subsequently dedicates resources towards the aims of that venture. It not only looks suspect, but it's a nasty start for the top official of IU to have done this. Lipfarts evaporate when the air clears. An open door (painstaking audit) provides the breeze needed.

      It must be done quickly, else IU scares away subsequent research candidates that had any relationship with McRobbie. A pariah effect would be deadly to IU, and would thwart McRobbie's ability to subsequently attract needed research-- and the current taint left by seemingly dubious behavior. Summary: the taint of quid pro quo and a subsequent vivid (if painful) open exposure of the aims of the relationship convinces all. And should the audit be very forthcoming and unquestionably clear McRobbie, then the best of luck and perserverent effort to all. Google survives by answers. Better answers are always desirable.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  32. Same guy who started Gracenote, bought CDDB... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scotss started Escient LLC in Indy with his voicemail booty. Sponsored a competitiveness group for Indiana, yet Escient was well known for low pay and excessive hours. Did the whole Gracenote/CDDB takeover of a free and public information system and turned it into a copyrighted, for profit, mess.

    Yup - Scott Jones is all about himself.