Invisible Solar Nano Cells Promise Clean Energy
An anonymous reader writes "ZDNet is reporting that Harvard scientists have developed a silicon nanowire 200 hundred times thinner than a human hair that crank out up to 200 picowatts. Charles Leiber from Harvard University, who devised the technology with colleagues, is quoted: "An individual nanoelectronic device will indeed consume very little power, but to do something interesting will require many interconnected devices and thus the power requirement — even for nanosystems — can be a challenge". Conventional sources, he added, are "bulky, non-renewable and expensive" by comparison."
I hate science reporting. It's also nice to know the editors aren't doing their jobs (ZDNet, I don't blame /.). What is a single strand? Is that 10mm long? 10cm? 1m? There is a big difference between those three. The summary just chops that sentence up worse. And why do they always use human hair as a comparison? Who's hair is that? Some people have very thin hair. For some people it is quite a bit thicker. If you are comparing it to the average, you should include that word. Also are we talking theoretical maximum or a practical estimation under normal daylight conditions?
It's great to know this generates 200 picowatts per something. How about comparing it to a normal production solar cell. I'm glad you can make it thin, but it must need some kind of support structure to survive, so how much thicker does it need to be so it is actually useful? After all, the silicon part of a solar cell is just a fraction of it's thickness.
Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
Actually it's moderately transparent - unless you happen to be one of the subset of humanity that has a particularly dark skin pigment. (Even then it's pretty transparent except on the outer layer - not that it matters. B-( )
Hold your hand up to a lamp. Notice the light coming through it. Very diffused, but clearly quite a bit there.
Of course if you move the nanowires out to the skin level the transparency of the body - even with a heavily-pigmented skin - is no longer an issue.
However, given the enormous energy density of the body's processes there should be plenty of power to tap for "embedded systems". For medical sensors give me a sugar/oxygen fuel cell any day. (The body uses those. Though perhaps a different system might be better for straight electrical output.)
Meanwhile this sort of structure sounds like it would make a dandy textile if it were thickened up a bit, spun into thread, and somebody can figure out how to connect to it.
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
Let's see, we've got nanowire that's "Thinner than a human hair", and generates 200 picowatts of electricity. So, if we use these things tethered at one end and free to sway loose at the other, we have a mat of electric-generating "fur". Fuzzy satellites? Implant into the human scalp (To cover those bald spots) and you could power your cybernetic implants. Self-powering Electro-Luminescent wire (Charges when off)?
Weave these things into a cloth, and we could have spaceships with a power-generating solar sail. Or sailboats that generate the power for their electronics (And/or onboard electric motors) with their sails. Or electric cars with power-generating soft-tops. Heck, weave a cloth of these things and embed it in epoxy resin and you've got power-generating carbon-fiber-like body panels. Just paint the inside and use a clear laquer on the outside.
Clothing that powers your wearable PC? In fact, what's to stop this being used as a low-current power conductor to start off with?
The possibilities are (almost) endless...